
Geological tracers have an original feature compared with other tracers in that they are
chronometers too.They move around with the motion of matter but keep a record of their
history, which is what makes them so valuable. In addition, they c an be used for exploring a
widetime range: notonlythe12billionyearsofthehistoryofthe Universeandthe 4.5billion
years of the Earth’s historybut also the details of planetogenesis some 4.5 billion years ago
or recent phenomenaofth e last millennia.
A second original feature is that the isotopic variations explored here are tiny, ranging
from1 0
3
to1 0
5
.Inotherwords,none ofthis wou ldb efeasiblewithoutth ei ncrediblypre -
ciseand sensitive technique ofmass spect rometry.
Lastly, andthis is nottheleastadvantage, wehaveahigh numberofisotopic tracers(more
than 40).Thus extremely vari ed problems can be addressed with the same techniques an d
the same metho ds.There is no doubtthatthe futurewill see more detailedstudiesofthevar-
ious fundamental phenomena (ocean ridges, subduction) and of the primordial Earth
usingthesamemethodology.
Problems
1 We consider the following geological history of a granite. Some 1500 Ma ago a volcanic–
detrital sediment formed by mixing in the proportions of 1/3 and 2/3. The volcanic
sediment has a
87
Sr/
86
Sr ratio of 0.703, and the Sr and Rb concentrations are 300 ppm and
10 ppm, respectively. For the detrital sediment, the
87
Sr/
86
Sr ratio ¼0.720 and the Sr and
Rb concentrations are 100 ppm and 100 ppm, respectively. The sediment is changed into
rock and sinks progressively over 500 Ma. At that time, caught up in orogenic convulsions,
it undergoes anatexis, which gives rise to a granite by partial melting. The Rb/Sr ratio of
the melt is (Rb/Sr)
melt
¼3(Rb/Sr)
sediment
. The granite then evolves over 1 Ga.
(i) Show the isotope history of the granite on a graph.
(ii) Calculate the initial and present-day
87
Sr/
86
Sr ratios of the granite.
2 In some cases, workers ascribe an important role to the metal core to modify classical
conclusions about the mantle.
(i) We assume the core contains potassium in a concentration of about 100 ppm. How does
that affect the
40
Ar balance as it has been envisaged? Calculate the mass of
40
Ar in the
core and the lower mantle.
(ii) Core–mantle reactions are also evoked to explain the lead isotope compositions of OIB. Take
the
238
U/
204
Pb ratios for the current value of the Earth of 1; the ratio of the primordial
mantle is 7 and that of the core is 0. Calculate the lead concentration in the core, given that
the total lead concentration of the core–lower mantle system is
C
m
Pb
¼0.696 ppm and that
in the lower mantle, after initial differentiation of the core,
C
m
Pb
¼0.1611.
(iii) Suppose that after initial differentiation, the core continues to deplete the lower mantle
of lead. Schematically, let us accept that 20% of the lead disappears (increasing the
mantle
value) and that the phenomenon can be modeled by a two-stage process involving
an extraction episode followed by an episode with no extraction, the age of the change in
regime being 3 Ga. Calculate the
206
Pb/
204
Pb and
207
Pb/
204
Pb ratios of the lower mantle.
Locate them relative to the 4.5 Ga geochron.
(iv) Do the same calculation with
T
diff
¼4 Ga.
(v) Can you draw any geochemical conclusions from these calculations?
355 Problems