
example is the case thatimplies osmium, because itsgeochemicalbehavior is atypical com-
paredwiththatofotherelements (Lambe rt etal.,1989).
Forelementswhoseonlyisotopefractionsare createdbyextractionofcontinentalcrust,a
double chemical fractionationprocess occurs: oneatthe mid-ocean ridges, theother inthe
subduction zon es.We have just seen with the example of lead thatthe two processes are not
identical (in the case of Pb/U, fractionation is reversed).We shall look more closely at this
questionusingother isotopetracers, thosefrom radioactive disequilibria.
6.6.5 Consequences for the Earth’s energy regime
Uranium, thorium, andpotassium, whichare all ele mentswhose radioactivity is an impor-
tantsourceofheatforth e internalactivityofour planet,aregreatlyenrichedinthe continen-
tal crust and therefore depleted in the upper mantle. The lower mantle is much richer in
these elements.It i s th e refo ret h e lowe r mantl e that su ppl ies t he upp e r mantl e’s convect ive
heat.Theupper mantleisheatedfrombelowand cooled fromabovebytheocean. Itisthe re-
fore in an almost ideal situation for convecting, by an admitte dly complex process but
which is akintowhatisknown inphysics as Rayleigh ^Be
¤
nard convection (seeTurcotteand
S chubert, 2002), which can be observed when a p an of water is put on the cooker to boil.
The lower mantle too c onvects, be cause it is very hot and is of large dimensions, but it con-
vects in a di¡erent manner, by internal heating particularly by the radioactive elements it
contains (it mightbe worth lookingback atthe end of Chapter1, where the calculations set
outwerepreparation forcurrentreasoning).
Exercise
We wish to test the two-layer convective model in respect of heat flow (see Chapter 1). The
measurements on MORB give the results: U ¼50 ppb, Th/U ¼2.2, and K/U ¼10
4
. Accepting
that the three elements are wholly incompatible, that is, that
C
liquid
¼
C
solid
/
F
where
F
is the
degree of partial melting estimated at 10%, calculate the heat flow of radioactive origin
produced by the upper mantle. Calculate the heat flow produced by the lower mantle if we
assume that for the mantle U ¼21 ppb, K/U ¼10
4
, and Th/U ¼4.2. Calculate the heat flow of
the continental crust given that K ¼1.2%, K/U ¼10
4
, and Th/U ¼5. Given that the total flow is
41 10
12
W, what proportion is produced by radioactivity? What makes up the difference?
Answer
The heat flows from radioactivity are: upper mantle: 0.95 10
12
W (terawatts), lower mantle
15.3 10
12
W, continental crust: 6.25 10
12
W, making a total of 22.5 10
12
W. The proportion
created by radioactivity (Urey ratio) is 0.5. The difference comes from energy stored when
the Earth formed and from differentiation of the core. It is stored in the lower mantle and
core (gravitational energy transformed into heat). The lower mantle therefore transmits
36.8 10
12
W whereas the upper mantle produces just 1 10
12
W.
6.6.6 Radioactive disequilibria and the difference between
R- and S-processes
Wehavejusttouch edupon itwithregardtoU/Pbfractionation,butweshallseeindetailwith
the exampleof
230
Th/
238
Usystems,whichwehavealreadydealtwith intermsofchronology,
322 Radiogenic isotope geochemistry