392
Photochemistry
of
Planetary
Atmospheres
the
most
likely
fate
of the O
atom
it
produces
is to
react with
02 via
reaction (10.16)
and
restore
03. It is
convenient
to
define
odd
oxygen,
O
x
,
as the sum of O and 03.
Reactions such
as
(10.16)
and
(10.29)
turn
one odd
oxygen into another
odd
oxygen.
There
is no net
production
or
destruction
of
O*.
We may
consider
the
(chemically)
net
nothing cycle
as a
"catalytic
cycle"
for
converting solar
UV
energy into thermal
energy:
The
beauty
of the
ozone layer
is
that
the
absorber
(63)
is not
efficiently
destroyed
by
the
UV
radiation,
and
this accounts
for the
extraordinary effectiveness
of
ozone
for
blocking
UV
radiation. Ultimately ozone
(odd
oxygen)
is
removed
by the
reactions
The set of five
reactions listed above,
(10.16)
and
(10.28)-(
10.31),
is
known
as
Chap-
man
chemistry.
It can be
shown
that
reaction (10.31)
is not
important
in the
part
of
the
stratosphere where ozone concentrations
are
maximum.
In
this
case
there
are
approximate analytic solutions
for the
concentrations
of O and
O^
as
defined
by the
Chapman chemistry:
Note
that
the
expression
for
63
concentration
in
(10.33)
implies
the
existence
of an
ozone layer.
At
high
altitudes,
the
values
of M and
[O
2
]
are
small, implying that
[03]
will
be
small.
In the
deep atmosphere
J\ is
small
(all
the
photons
are
absorbed
by
the
overlying
O
2
column),
and
[03]
will also
be
small. Maximum values
of
[03]
are
attained
in the
stratosphere.
Chapman chemistry provides
a
generally accurate model
of
ozone concentrations
(to
within
a
factor
of 2)
above
the
ozone peak. However, there
are at
least
two
weaknesses
of
the
theory. First,
in the
lower stratosphere below
the
ozone peak
the
lifetime
of 03
becomes long compared
with
transport. Dynamics play
a
crucial role
in
determining
the
seasonal
and
latitudinal distributions
of
ozone. Figure
10.26
presents
the
zonally
averaged observed column abundance
of
atmospheric ozone
as a
function
of
latitude
and
time
of the
year. Note
the low
column densities
in the
tropics (where
03 is
produced
by
Chapman chemistry)
and the
higher column densities
in the
polar regions.
This
distribution
is the
opposite
of
what
a
photochemical theory
of
ozone would
predict.
The
spatial
and
temporal variations
of
ozone,
as
displayed
in figure
10.26,
are
the
result
of the
dynamical motion
of the
lower atmosphere.