Using type variation
To show relative importance within text, there are a number
of standard type variations that can be used. Each decision
will have an impact on a reader’s comprehension of the text,
as type variations imply a particular level of importance due
to their traditional role in typography.
Bold type
Bold type is ‘heavier’ in weight than text fonts. This is
achieved by thickening the strokes of the original font’s
letterforms. Thickening makes bold fonts appear darker.
The level of relative darkness of a font is referred to as its
weight and how it is set on a page determines its typecolour
or tonal variance to the other type around it.
Weight variation is often used to add life to a page layout
or to help define levels of information contained within text.
Darker text tends to jump out of a page of ordinary text and
grab the reader’s attention (which makes it perfect for
indicating the location of specific information, as a heading
does, or for warnings). The choice of a bold font is all to do
with the resulting patterns of tone that are created on a
page by the areas of type.
In a heading hierarchy, bold type is the strongest (with
the exception of a reversed block of text)—and is therefore
reserved for the most important information. Bold headings
within a text area will stand out because of the contrast
between bold type at its heavier weight and the lighter
text type. It is easier for readers to find the section they
want to read.
Because bold type is a thickened version of the typeface,
the counters (i.e. the enclosed spaces within letters such as
the loop of the e) are correspondingly smaller. This can
make the letters a bit difficult to distinguish, so it is wise to
track bold type a little looser—but only fractionally, because
the more space you put between the letters, the lighter the
typecolour will appear to be, and you must not lose the
benefit of the weight change.
Typefaces like Helvetica, Frutiger, Gill and Univers
(notice they are all sans serif) mostly come with an
extrabold or black weight. This weight is particularly
handy—its contrast is very sudden when compared with the
text weights and can be impressive.
However, if overused, bold type can be too distracting
and can inhibit reading, but, judiciously used, it can
Typography 193
DOING IT SMARTER
Typeface associations
Create 12 layouts that show type
contrasts for the pairs of words listed
below. Each layout should be in a
60 mm square (but can be any size
you want). Select a typeface for each
word and choose the way you set it:
In capitals? What spacing? In bold or
italic? On an angle or upside down?
Reversed out of black to white?
Tracked? What size? Not only should
these design decisions help to convey
the meaning of each word, they
should also depict the difference
between the two words.
This is not just a type selection
exercise. Use layout to help
communicate the difference in
meaning as well. Use repetition,
reversing, centring and other
formatting options. Run one word
through the other or explore other
forms of dynamic placement in an
asymmetrical layout.
To increase the complexity of
this exercise, use a typeface only
once. This means that for the
12 examples, 24 typefaces must be
chosen. If you have used Helvetica
extrabold, don’t use Helvetica
again—find another sans serif type
that will work as you want.
This is a great exercise if you
are working on book titles and
advertising headlines, or feature
articles in newsletters, magazines,
Web sites or e-zines.
The words to be contrasted are:
q big/little
q fat/thin
q dark/light
q happy/sad
q out/in
q old/young
q rich/poor
q up/down
q fast/slow
q east/west
q beautiful/ugly
q powerful/meek.
DWD-DM06 7/5/01 12:56 PM Page 193