9 Designing the Carbon Nanotube Field Effect Transistor 225
Fig. 9.6 The band structure of the isolated squeezed nanotube with the same geometry as Fig. 9.5b
without the compressing metal layers. Panels (b), (c),and(d) are contour plots of the charge density
of the three doubly degenerate states at the Γ point, as indicated by the three rightward arrows in
panel (a).The+/− signs in (b), (c),and(d) indicate the phase of the wave function. The vertical
dotted lines in (b), (c),and(d) represent the mirror reflection plane. Reused with permission from
Noejung Park, Donghoon Kang, and Suklyun Hong, Applied Physics Letters, 87, 013112 (2005).
Copyright 2005, American Institute of Physics
wave function, indicated by +/− signs, show that the second valence state changes
most slowly along the nanotube–metal contact (dotted lines). Therefore, the hy-
bridization of this state with the Au 6s bands is easier than other valence states.
This explains why the second van Hove singularity is strongly affected, as shown in
Fig. 9.5e, by the shortening of the nanotube–metal distance. As a result, the occupa-
tion of the Au 6s bands increases, which means that the amount of charge transfer
from the CNT to the gold layer is also increased. Thus the Fermi level up-shift
shown in Fig. 9.5e and f is a consequence of the lowered local potential, which is in
turn due to the increased electron depletion in the CNT region.
The variation in the charge transfer with the pressure can be seen explicitly in the
charge density differences, ∆
ρ
=
ρ
[CNT/M]−
ρ
[CNT]−
ρ
[M], where M is a metal
layer. ∆
ρ
was plotted along the z-direction after averaging over the xy plane. z is the
distance from the topmost gold layer, and the arrows in Fig. 9.7c and d indicate the
edges of the CNT. Figure 9.7c shows that electronic charge accumulates on the side
of the gold surface, which indicates that the electronegativity of gold is larger than
that of the CNT. The comparison of Fig. 9.7c and d shows that electron accumulation
just above the gold surface increases when the contact is under pressure. This result
is consistent with the increased Au-C hybridization, as discussed earlier. The charge
transfer induced by the hybridization largely compensates the difference between
the local work functions of gold and the CNT, pushing the Fermi level toward the
conduction edge of the CNT. We also performed a similar calculation with other
faces of gold and found similar results.
Now we turn to the case in which strong chemical bonds have formed at the
metal–CNT interface [40,59]. In Fig. 9.8, we show that the Fermi levels of both the
gold and aluminum layers are located at the midgap of the carbon nanotube when
the metal layers and the carbon nanotube are chemically bonded. This suggests that
the Fermi level of the metal is strongly pinned at the midgap of the CNT, irrespective