prostaglandin H synthase (Section 25-7B) and squalene-
hopene cyclase (Section 25-6Ad). Nevertheless, these en-
zymes have no apparent sequence or structural homology,
which suggests that they have independently evolved simi-
lar modes of membrane integration.
f. Integral Proteins Have Common
Structural Features
Hydrophobic forces, as we have seen in Section 8-4, are
the dominant interactions stabilizing the three-dimensional
structures of water-soluble globular proteins. However,
since the membrane-exposed regions of integral proteins
are immersed in nonpolar environments, what stabilizes
their structures? Analysis of a variety of integral proteins
indicates that their membrane-exposed regions have a
hydrophobic organization opposite to that of water-soluble
proteins: Their membrane-exposed residues are more
hydrophobic, on average, than their interior residues, even
though these interior residues have average hydrophobici-
ties and packing densities comparable to those of water-
soluble proteins. Evidently, the structures of integral and
water-soluble proteins are both stabilized by the exclusion
of their interior residues from the surrounding solvent,
although in the case of integral proteins, the solvent is the
lipid bilayer. In addition, the low polarity and anhydrous
environments of transmembrane proteins are likely to
strengthen their hydrogen bonds relative to those of solu-
ble proteins.
In the foregoing TM proteins, those portions of the
transmembrane secondary structural elements (helices in
BR and the PRC, and  strands in the porins) that contact
the bilayer’s hydrocarbon core consist mainly of the hy-
drophobic residues Ala, Ile, Leu,Val, and Phe.The flanking
residues, which penetrate the bilayer’s interface region, are
enriched with Trp, and Tyr. Hence, TM proteins’ hydropho-
bic transmembrane bands are bordered by rings of Trp and
Tyr side chains (e.g., Fig. 12-27c) that delineate the water–
bilayer interface. Note that these side chains are oriented
such that their polar portions (N and O atoms) extend into
the polar regions of the membrane, a phenomenon named
snorkeling. Lys and Arg side chains near the interface tend
to be similarly oriented. In contrast, Phe, Leu, and Ile side
chains tend to point toward the membrane core, a phenom-
enon dubbed antisnorkeling.
In each of the foregoing TM proteins, the secondary
structural elements that are adjacent in sequence are also
adjacent in structure and hence tend to be antiparallel.This
relatively simple up–down topology results from the con-
straints associated with the insertion of a folding polypep-
tide chain into the lipid bilayer (Section 12-4Be).
B. Lipid-Linked Proteins
Lipids and proteins associate covalently to form lipid-
linked proteins, whose lipid portions anchor their attached
proteins to membranes and mediate protein–protein interac-
tions. Proteins form covalent attachments with three
classes of lipids: (1) isoprenoid groups such as farnesyl and
geranylgeranyl residues, (2) fatty acyl groups such as myris-
toyl and palmitoyl residues, and (3) glycoinositol phospho-
lipids (GPIs). In this subsection, we discuss the properties
of these lipid-linked proteins.
a. Prenylated Proteins
A variety of proteins have covalently attached iso-
prenoid groups, mainly the C
15
farnesyl and C
20
geranylger-
anyl residues (isoprene, a C
5
hydrocarbon, is the chemical
unit from which many lipids, including cholesterol and
other steroids, are constructed; Section 25-6A).
The most common isoprenylation (or just prenylation) site
in proteins is the C-terminal tetrapeptide CaaX, where C is
Cys, “a” is often an aliphatic amino acid residue, and X is
any amino acid. However, the identity of X is a major
prenylation determinant: Proteins are farnesylated when X
is Gln, Met, or Ser and geranylgeranylated when X is Leu.
In both cases, the prenyl group is enzymatically linked to
the Cys sulfur atom via a thioether linkage.The aaX tripep-
tide is then proteolytically excised and the newly exposed
terminal carboxyl group is esterified with a methyl group
(Fig. 12-29).
Two other types of prenylation sites have also been
characterized: (1) the C-terminal sequence CXC, in which
both Cys residues are geranylgeranylated and the terminal
carboxyl group is methyl esterified; and (2) the C-terminal
sequence CC in which one or both Cys residues are ger-
anylgeranylated but the carboxyl group is not methylated.
Proteins that are so prenylated are almost exclusively
members of the Rab family of small GTP-binding proteins
that participate in intracellular membrane trafficking (Sec-
tion 12-4Db).
What functions are served by protein prenylation?
Many prenylated proteins are associated with intracellular
membranes, and mutating their Cys prenylation sites
blocks their membrane localization. Evidently, the hy-
drophobic prenyl group can act to anchor its attached pro-
tein to a membrane. However, this can only be part of the
story since proteins with the same prenyl groups may be lo-
calized to different intracellular membranes. Moreover,
fusing the CaaX motif from a normally prenylated protein
to the C-terminus of a normally unprenylated protein
yields a hybrid protein that is correctly prenylated and
carboxyl methylated but which remains cytosolic. These
H
2
C
HC
Isoprene
Farnesyl residue
CH
C
CH
2
CH
3
CH
3
CH
3
CH
3
CH
3
HC
Geranylgeranyl residue
CH
3
CH
3
CH
3
CH
3
CH
3
406 Chapter 12. Lipids and Membranes
JWCL281_c12_386-466.qxd 6/9/10 12:06 PM Page 406