rations are greatly improved, however, through the use of
high-resolution columns, and the column retention times
are much reduced.The narrow and relatively long columns
are packed with a noncompressible matrix of fine (1–10
m in diameter) silica beads, whose available hydroxyl
groups can be derivatized with many of the commonly used
functional groups of ion exchange chromatography, RPC,
HIC, or affinity chromatography. Alternatively, glass or
plastic beads may be coated with a thin layer of the station-
ary phase. The mobile phase is one of the solvent systems
previously discussed, including gradient elutions with bi-
nary or even ternary mixtures. In the case of HPLC, how-
ever, the mobile phase is forced through the tightly packed
column at pressures of up to 15,000 psi (pounds per square
inch), leading to greatly reduced analysis times. The elu-
tants are detected as they leave the column according to
their UV absorption, refractive index, or fluorescence.
The advantages of HPLC are
1. Its high resolution, which permits the routine purifi-
cation of mixtures that have defied separation by other
techniques.
2. Its speed, which permits separations to be accom-
plished in as little as a few minutes.
3. Its high sensitivity, which, in favorable cases, permits
the quantitative estimation of less than picomole quantities
of materials.
4. Its capacity for automation.
Thus, few biochemistry laboratories now function without
access to at least one HPLC system. HPLC is also often uti-
lized in the clinical analyses of body fluids because it can
rapidly, routinely, and automatically yield reliable quantita-
tive estimates of nanogram quantities of biological materi-
als such as vitamins, steroids, lipids, and drug metabolites.
4 ELECTROPHORESIS
Electrophoresis, the migration of ions in an electric field, is
widely used for the analytical separation of biological mol-
ecules. The laws of electrostatics state that the electrical
force, F
electric
, on an ion with charge q in an electric field of
strength E is expressed by
[6.6]
The resulting electrophoretic migration of the ion through
the solution is opposed by a frictional force
[6.7]
where v is the rate of migration (velocity) of the ion and f
is its frictional coefficient. The frictional coefficient is a
measure of the drag that the solution exerts on the moving
ion and is dependent on the size, shape, and state of solva-
tion of the ion as well as on the viscosity of the solution (Sec-
tion 6-5A). In a constant electric field, the forces on the ion
balance each other:
[6.8]qE ⫽ vf
F
friction
⫽ vf
F
electric
⫽ qE
so that each ion moves with a constant characteristic veloc-
ity. An ion’s electrophoretic mobility, , is defined
[6.9]
The electrophoretic (ionic) mobilities of several common
small ions in H
2
O at 25°C are listed in Table 2-2.
Equation [6.9] really applies only to ions at infinite dilu-
tion in a nonconducting solvent. In aqueous solutions, poly-
electrolytes such as proteins are surrounded by a cloud of
counterions, which impose an additional electric field of
such magnitude that Eq. [6.9] is, at best, a poor approxima-
tion of reality. Unfortunately, the complexities of ionic so-
lutions have, so far, precluded the development of a theory
that can accurately predict the mobilities of polyelec-
trolytes. Equation [6.9], however, correctly indicates that
molecules at their isoelectric points, pI, have zero elec-
trophoretic mobility. Furthermore, for proteins and other
polyelectrolytes that have acid–base properties, the ionic
charge, and hence the electrophoretic mobility, is a func-
tion of pH.
The use of electrophoresis to separate proteins was first
reported in 1937 by the Swedish biochemist Arne Tiselius.
The technique he introduced, moving boundary elec-
trophoresis, was one of the few powerful analytical tech-
niques available in the early years of protein chemistry.
However, since this method takes place entirely in solu-
tion, preventing the convective mixing of the migrating
proteins necessitates a cumbersome apparatus that re-
quires very large samples. Moving boundary electro-phore-
sis has therefore been supplanted by zone electrophoresis,
a technique in which the sample is constrained to move in
a solid support such as filter paper, cellulose acetate, or,
most commonly, a gel. This largely eliminates the convec-
tive mixing of the sample that limits the resolution achiev-
able by moving boundary electrophoresis. Moreover, in
zone electrophoresis, the various sample components mi-
grate as discrete bands (zones) and hence only small quan-
tities of materials are required.
A. Paper Electrophoresis
In paper electrophoresis, the sample is applied to a point
on a strip of filter paper or cellulose acetate moistened
with buffer solution. The ends of the strip are immersed in
separate reservoirs of buffer in which the electrodes are
placed (Fig. 6-18). On application of a direct current (often
of ⬃20 V ⴢ cm
–1
), the ions of the sample migrate toward the
electrodes of opposite polarity at characteristic rates to
eventually form discrete bands. An ion’s migration rate is
influenced, to some extent, by its interaction with the sup-
port matrix but is largely a function of its charge. On com-
pletion of the electrophoretogram (which usually takes
several hours), the strip is dried and the sample compo-
nents are located using the same detection methods em-
ployed in paper chromatography (Section 6-3D).
Paper electrophoresis and paper chromatography are su-
perficially similar. However, paper electrophoresis separates
⫽
v
E
⫽
q
f
146 Chapter 6. Techniques of Protein and Nucleic Acid Purification
JWCL281_c06_129-162.qxd 2/22/10 2:25 PM Page 146