imposing actor. When his starring days were over in the
1960s, he slipped comfortably into character roles, which he
continued playing until shortly before his death.
Born John Hamilton, Hayden quit school at the age of 16
to run away to sea. By the age of 22 he was a bona-fide cap-
tain with a surprising degree of fame due to his well-publi-
cized sailing exploits. Urged to take advantage of his chiseled
good looks, and in need of money to buy his own boat, he
began to model and quickly found himself with a movie con-
tract at Paramount. He made his screen debut as one of the
two male leads (
FRED MACMURRAY
was the other) in Virginia
(1941). His female costar was Madeleine Carroll, whom he
would soon marry and then divorce four years later. Hayden
made but one more movie, Bahama Passage (1941), before
turning his back on Hollywood to join the marines when the
Japanese attacked Pearl Harbor.
Hayden was off the big screen until 1947, when he had to
start virtually from scratch. Without much studio support, he
seemed destined for obscurity. Paramount soon dropped him
and he began to look for work on his own, landing the prize
role of the down-and-out tough guy who joins the other
doomed criminals in
JOHN HUSTON
’s classic The Asphalt Jun-
gle (1950). His character was both harsh and not a little
dumb, but Hayden infused him with a dignity and vulnera-
bility that made audiences care about his ultimate downfall.
It was the greatest performance of his career.
Most of his films during the rest of the 1950s were routine
action films, with but two notable exceptions. The first was
Johnny Guitar (1954),
NICHOLAS RAY
’s intense psychological
western, in which he portrayed the title character, a laconic
gunslinger. The second was
STANLEY KUBRICK
’s The Killing
(1956), in which he virtually reprised his role in The Asphalt
Jungle. In fact, the film bore a striking resemblance to Hus-
ton’s movie. In any event, both the film and Hayden’s per-
formance were widely admired by the critics, if not the public.
Hayden had harbored deep feelings of guilt concerning
his testimony to the House Un-American Activities Com-
mittee in 1951. He had named names of communist sympa-
thizers in Hollywood, destroying their careers, and he later
came to believe that he had made a terrible moral mistake. In
the late 1950s, his emotional distress was compounded by
divorce proceedings and a custody battle for his children. In
defiance of a court order, he took his kids with him and set
sail to the South Seas.
His career was in a shambles. Slowly, he put it back
together again, first by writing a thoughtful autobiography,
Wanderer, that was centered around his highly publicized
“kidnapping” of his own children. The book was published in
1963, and it brought him a measure of sympathy and respect.
The following year, he returned to the screen as a character
actor, playing an insane general in Stanley Kubrick’s Dr.
Strangelove (1964). He worked only sporadically during the
rest of his career, but his supporting character roles in films
such as Loving (1970), The Godfather (1972), The Long Good-
bye (1973), and Winter Kills (1979) were often memorable.
In the last decade of his life, Hayden demonstrated both his
love for the sea and a talent for writing fiction when he penned
a best-selling novel, Voyage: A Novel of 1896. He died of cancer.
Hays Code, The The film industry’s rules for self-cen-
sorship, also known as the Production Code, that were
designed in 1930 and originally administered by Will H.
Hays. During the first four years of the code’s existence, it
was almost universally ignored because there was no enforce-
ment mechanism.
Will Hays, former chairman of the Republican National
Committee and U.S. postmaster general during President
Harding’s administration, was originally hired by the movie
bigwigs in 1922 to head a newly formed industry-watchdog
organization, the Motion Picture Producers and Distributors
of America, Inc. The organization was brought into being as
a response to the public outcry following a long string of
Hollywood scandals, most notably the
FATTY ARBUCKLE
rape case. The MPPDA soon came to be known simply as the
Hays Office. It was an organization with little clout during
the 1920s, created merely as a smokescreen to keep the fed-
eral government from imposing its own brand of censorship
or control over the wild and woolly film business.
In the early 1930s, however, filmmakers pushed the more
conservative members of the moviegoing audience too far.
MAE WEST
’s suggestive humor,
JEAN HARLOW
’s harlotry, and
a rash of violent gangster films all led to a public outcry that
the film industry was corrupt and had to be censored. Fear-
ing that their power might be circumscribed by Congress,
the movie moguls went into action first, censoring them-
selves by putting genuine teeth in Will Hays’s strengthened
new production code in 1934. Any movie shown in any movie
theater owned by the studios (which were the vast majority of
the most successful, most profitable, theaters in the country)
had to have the Hays Code seal of approval. Without that
seal, a movie simply could not survive commercially.
The Hays Code was stringent, particularly in matters
pertaining to sex. The code stated that “no picture shall be
produced which will lower the standards of those who see it.”
To see to this, the code held that, “Seduction or rape should
never be more than suggested . . . sex perversion or any infer-
ence to it is forbidden . . . sex hygiene and venereal diseases
are not subjects for motion pictures. . . . indecent or undue
exposure is forbidden,” and so on.
Language was another area of concern. Certain words
could not be used in films if said in a “profane” manner.
Although there was a faintly liberal impulse behind the Hays
Code’s dictates concerning religion, it stated that no film
“may throw ridicule on any religious faith”; in the application
of that rule, one could not present any member of the cloth
as a villain—or for that matter, even a bumbler or a fool—
thereby implicitly upholding the institution of religion rather
than merely protecting it from abuse.
As for violence, the guiding principle came to be known
as the “Law of Compensating Values.” Characters could be
terribly evil and violent just so long as they were properly
punished for their sins by movie’s end. Films suffered from
this dictum because audiences could always guess the end-
ing; the bad guy would get his just deserts and the hero
would always win. As a result, movies that purported to be
realistic often had tacked-on happy endings that were any-
thing but.
HAYS CODE, THE
190