xiv
PREFACE
of numerical weather prediction, at least for the slow component of the
system, can
be
extended to time scale of the order of
10,000
km/U, namely,
10-
15
days. This speculation, underlying most of the meeting discussion, is
directly linked with the observational studies presented by many authors
(Dole, Schilling, Sutera, Hansen). In particular Dole and Schilling, analyz-
ing Pacific and Atlantic blocking events, found that the characteristic time
scale for such anomalous flows is of the order of
10
days. Moreover, the
results presented by Egger
et
al.
and Sutera show that the probability distri-
bution of the duration
in
time of anomalies is with good accuracy a Poisson
distribution with average time of about
10
days. During the workshop dis-
cussion it was clarified that a Poisson distribution is not the consequence of
an absence of a characteristic time scale but, on the contrary, it is indicative
that an instability mechanism is acting on the system. In agreement with this
are the results of Frederiksen, who studied the set of normal mode instabili-
ties acting on the climatological state. Stationary waves dominated the
growing unstable field after
5
days, with a pattern resembling North Pacific
and Atlantic anomalies. Assuming that an instability different from ordinary
baroclinic instability
is
acting on the ultralong planetary waves in middle
latitude circulation, we are faced with the question whether this process is
triggered by changes in the boundary conditions or in the forcing terms (such
as tropical forcing or sea surface temperature anomalies) or, alternatively, is
mainly due to the internal variability ofthe atmospheric system. Kalnay and
Mo’s
article addresses directly this question for the January 1979 Southern
Hemisphere anomaly using the general circulation model (GCM) of GLAS.
In that case tropical forcing seems to
be
particularly important
to
explain
both the duration and the location of the anomaly. ShuMa discusses explic-
itly the Northern Hemisphere response to an “El Nifio” year by GCM
simulations. The correlations between
sea
surface temperature (SST) anom-
alies and blocking events is indicative of a nonnegligible response of North-
ern Hemisphere circulation to tropical forcing. It is in general very difficult
to use
GCMs
to distinguish between internal and external variability
of
atmospheric circulations. In the article by Mechoso
et
al.
the effects of high
and low spatial resolutions (both vertical and horizontal) on the simulation
of Northern Hemisphere anomalies using the UCLA GCM model are dis-
cussed. Special attention is focused on the ability to forecast stratospheric
sudden warming. Resolution problems
for
the stationary forcing due to
orography are also discussed in Tibaldi’s article. The numerical experiments
performed by Tibaldi show that systematic corrections of the zonal
flow
probably have the most important effect in improving the predicted behav-
ior of the ultralong planetary waves. By this brief discussion of GCM simula-
tions we conclude that the representation of the anomalous behavior in
numerical models is not yet perfected; much more work is therefore needed.
Nevertheless, as
GCM
simulations are the analogs in meteorology of labora-