52
RANDALL
M.
DOLE
Simmons and Hoskins,
1978).
Such a structure, however, may also
be
partly
an artifact of data coverage because, over this region, data are more plentiful
at these levels. Nevertheless, comparison of the relative positions
of
the
centers at the data-rich levels suggests that there are pronounced westward
tilts with height throughout the troposphere, and that, at an early stage in the
development, the maximum anomalies are realized in the upper tropo-
sphere.
The corresponding development at
20"
N indicates that, in parallel with its
midlatitude positive counterpart, the main negative center progresses east-
ward across the Pacific through day
0.
Subtropical negative anomalies are
initially confined primarily to the upper troposphere. Following
day
0
(not
shown), however, 1000-mb heights continue to
fall
over the central Pacific,
leading to the establishment of
a
cold-core negative center with little or no
evidence of tilts throughout the troposphere.
Figure
10
shows simiIar analyses
for
the PAC negative
cases.
In many
respects, the vertical evolution parallels that
of
the positive cases. The main
center propagates eastward and intensifies through the period. The asso-
ciated trough
axis
initially tilts strongly westward with height, but becomes
nearly vertical by
day
0.
Double maxima are also evident in the vertical
structure early in the evolution, giving way to a single major center in the
upper troposphere
by
day
0.
The subtropical patterns are initially rather
illdefined, but a positive center is evident over the subtropical mid-Pacific
from day
-2
onward. By day
0,
positive anomalies associated with this
feature extend from the surface to above
100
mbar. Vertical tilts are rela-
tively small, although there is some indication
of
eastward tilts with increas-
ing height up to the tropopause level, suggesting the possibility of downward
energy propagation from
this
level.
For both positive and negative
cases,
then, the strongest anomalies occur
in the upper troposphere throughout development. At midlatitudes, there
are also substantial low-level anomalies that are initially displaced eastward
relative to the upper level centers; this relative displacement generally de-
creases with time
as
the anomalies approach maximum amplitudes. In con-
trast, the subtropics display little evidence of substantial surface anomalies
prior to development; vertical tilts, if any, appear to
be
predominantly east-
ward with increasing height. These structures are quite distinct from the
vertical structures of disturbances forced
by
local anomalous heat sources as
obtained in simple models
of
the stationary wave response to thermal forcing
(Hoskins and Karoly,
198 l),
suggesting that local diabatic heating anomalies
are unlikely to
be
the proximate source for their development.
The evolving jet structure located over eastern Asia and the western Pa-
cific prior to development
also
appears to
be
associated with pronounced
thermal anomalies. This is illustrated for the negative
cases
in Fig.
I
1,
which