POLICY & MARKETS: CLIMATE COMBAT
60 RENEWABLE ENERGY WORLD MAY–JUNE 2011
F
or all their calamitous outcomes, wars – and the military
which wages them – have long been a source of radical new
technological developments. Navies throughout history, for example,
have been early adopters of new technologies and were the driving
force in the transition from sail power to coal in the 19th century, and
from oil to nuclear power in the post-war era.
But the military’s adoption of new technology had its greatest
and most enduring impact in 1912 when Winston Churchill, then the
UK’s First Lord of the Admirality, ordered the British Royal Navy to
switch its fuel source from coal to oil in its new battleships. This was
not only a dening moment in the history of warfare but it also led to
the development of the oilelds of the Persian Gulf and the growth
of the Anglo-Persain oil company, an antecedent of the modern-day
BP, and put the world on a path towards growing oil dependency
that has dened energy economics in recent decades.
Fast-forward 100 years and the military is again looking to switch
energy sources in a shift away from hydrocarbon dependence
and with a nod on renewables playing an increasingly important
role. And, as with Churchill’s decision, the move is likely to have
repercussions well beyond the battleeld.
AN URGENT MILITARY PRIORITY
The military has two main reasons to be interested in renewables,
both of them compelling. The rst is cost. According to gures from
the US Defense Energy Support Center, the country’s military spent
about US$18 billion on fuel in 2008.
Added to that is the oil price, which while not yet at 2008 levels,
has been creeping inexorably upwards to remain stubbornly above
$100/barrel for the past few months. This puts an enormous strain
on the US defence budget with every $10/barrel price increase
translating into a massive $1.3 billion/year rise in spending.
But while cost is a key factor, an even greater imperative is the
fact that the US military’s insatiable need for hydrocarbons is having
a negative impact on its ability to ght. Fuel supplies severely restrict
battleeld mobility and fuel convoys themselves make relatively easy
targets for insurgents, while tying up the key front-line troops that
are necessary to protect them.
The problem was seen as so serious that in 2006, the top US
military commander in western Iraq, Major General Richard Zilmer,
urgently requested the Pentagon to send more renewable energy
systems to the country to make use of solar and wind power to
produce power for bases and outposts.
Zilmer’s decision was seen as the opening shot in the push
for a greater role of renewables in the military. And while the US
involvement in Iraq is now winding down, the ongoing war in
Afghanistan is proving an even sterner testing ground for renewable
energy technologies.
Mainly this is due to a lack of infrastructure. Afghanistan has no
national electricity grid and much of the country’s power comes from
diesel generators. This means that fuel often has to be transported
long distances in convoys of trucks from Pakistan or own in by
plane. Both options are expensive and supply columns are often
attacked, sometimes with devastating consequences. Indeed, fuel
supply problems are often cited as one of the reasons for the defeat
of Soviet forces in Afghanistan during the 1980s.
Moreover, the cost of providing energy in war zones is often
calculated as a ‘fully burdened’ cost, which means not just the initial
cost of buying fuel, but also the cost of transporting it to where it is
needed. Per gallon estimates range anywhere from $20 to $1000.
Then there is the human cost. General Steve Anderson, a senior
logistician in Iraq for the US military, estimates that more than 1000
Americans have been killed in Iraq and Afghanistan as a direct result
of transporting fuel to power tents and buildings.
To combat this, renewable energy, particularly solar photovoltaics
and solar water heating, are attractive options. The US Defense
Department is evaluating mobile solar and wind generators to
replace fuel trucks in combat zones, but its ambitions do not end
there. In total, it has projects in various stages of development for
hundreds of megawatts of renewable energy.
It has also backed several programmes to reach a renewable
portfolio standard, according to a recent report: ‘Reenergizing
America’s Defense’ published by the Pew Project on National
Security, Energy and Climate. The report describes efforts by the
US military, which uses nearly 80% of the US government’s energy
consumption, to reduce dependence on fossil fuels and cut pollution
by enhancing energy efciency and using clean energy technologies.
The goal is for the US military to produce 25% of its energy needs
from renewable sources by 2025.
ORDER OF THE DAY: BIG PROJECTS, TOUGH TARGETS
Solar is leading the charge. The US Army is developing a
500 MW solar power generation plant in Fort Irwin, California, that
will help power the base and reduce its vulnerability to power supply
disruptions as well as using solar shades with tents to better insulate
them in an effort to reduce cooling costs. The army believes this
could cut energy usage by up to 50% by lessening the need for
air-conditioning.
Even the famous Top Gun ghter school
has felt the need for solar and has installed
solar technologies on base buildings
Not to be outdone, the US Air Force is also keen to get in on the
act. The Nellis Solar Power Plant near Las Vegas, Nevada is already
operational. The plant covers a huge 57 hectare area of land leased
from the US Air Force at the nearby Nellis Air Force Base, which is
home to advanced ghter training. Operations began there in 2007
and it will eventually produce 25% of the power used at the base,
which is currently more than 25 GWh/year. Its ground-mounted PV
modules employ a sun-tracking system, with around 70,000 solar
panels, and the peak power generation capacity of the plant is
approximately 13 MW.
Even the famous Top Gun ghter school at Miramar, California
has felt the need for solar and has installed solar technologies
on base buildings, which has put the base on track to achieve a
43% reduction in energy usage by 2012, against a goal of a 90%
reduction by 2017.
And solar energy is by no means restricted to American soil. Solar
water heating has provided warm showers for American soldiers
on active service in Afghanistan’s Helmand province as part of a
programme overseen by the US Department of Energy’s National
Renewable Energy Laboratories. NREL is also looking to utilise the
potential of rooftop and browneld options for photovoltaic arrays
in the country.
Previous Page | Contents | Zoom in | Zoom out | Front Cover | Search Issue | Next Page
RENEWABLE
ENERGY
WORLD
B
A
M
S
a
G
E
F
Previous Page | Contents | Zoom in | Zoom out | Front Cover | Search Issue | Next Page
RENEWABLE
ENERGY
WORLD
B
A
M
S
a
G
E
F