lecture). The Hobbes and Hume lectures presented here were mainly de-
rived from transcriptions of recording tapes of Rawls’s lectures for that
term, which have been supplemented by Rawls’s handwritten lecture notes
and class handouts.
1
Rawls typically provided students with summaries that
outlined the main points in his lectures. Prior to the early 1980s (when he
started typing his lectures on a word processor), these handouts were hand-
written in a very fine script which, when typed out, filled more than two
single-spaced pages. These handouts have been used to supplement the lec-
tures on Hobbes and Hume, and they also provide most of the content of
the first two Sidgwick lectures in the Appendix.
One great benefit of these lectures is that they reveal how Rawls con-
ceived of the history of the social contract tradition, and suggest how he
saw his own work in relation to that of Locke, Rousseau, and Kant, and to
some degree Hobbes as well. Rawls also discusses and responds to Hume’s
utilitarian reaction to Locke’s social contract doctrine, including Hume’s ar-
gument that the social contract is superficial and an “unnecessary shuffle”
(Rawls), an argument that established a pattern of criticism that continues
down to the present day. Another substantial benefit of this volume is
Rawls’s discussion of J. S. Mill’s liberalism. It suggests many parallels be-
tween his own and Mill’s views, including not just the palpable similarities
between Mill’s principle of liberty and Rawls’s first principle of justice, but
also the less tangible parallels between Mill’s political economy and Rawls’s
account of distributive justice and property-owning democracy.
The Marx lectures evolved perhaps more than others over the years. In
the early 1980s Rawls endorsed the position (held by Allen Wood, among
others) that Marx did not have a conception of justice but rather regarded
justice as an ideological concept necessary to sustain the exploitation of the
working class. He revises that position in the lectures included here, under
the influence of G. A. Cohen and others. Rawls’s interpretation of Marx’s
Labor Theory of Value seeks to separate its outmoded economics from
what he regards as its main aim. He construes it as a powerful response to
the Marginal Productivity Theory of Just Distribution and other classical
[x]
Editor’s Foreword
1. The editor served as one of Rawls’s graduate teaching assistants (along with An-
drews Reath) in the spring term of 1983, and recorded the Hobbes and Hume lectures
transcribed here. The lectures on Locke, Mill, and Marx were also recorded in 1983. These
tapes, as well as tapes of Rawls’s 1984 lectures, have been preserved in digital format and
deposited in the Rawls Archives at Widener Library, Harvard University.
Copyright © The President and Fellows of Harvard College
EXAM COPY
EXAM COPY
EXAM COPY
EXAM COPY
EXAM COPY
EXAM COPY
EXAM COPY