equal right, to self-realization (Marx), 343–
344
equal rights, and permanent interests of
humankind, 304–305
ethics, method of, defined (Sidgwick), 381
Eve, and original sin, 208
Exclusion Crisis, 105–106, 108, 122
exploitation (Marx): and capitalism, 324,
333; rate of, 325–326, 334; exists under
perfect competition, 331; Marx’s descrip-
tive definition of, vs. use as moral con-
cept, 335; depends on basic structure of
society, 335, 346; presupposes conception
of right and justice, 336; injustice of, 343;
private property basis of, 350; absence of
in society of freely associated producers,
364–365; under socialism, 366
faculties (capacities), higher vs. lower (Mill),
259, 262
fairness: of terms of social cooperation, 56;
and moral obligation, 70–71; sense of,
not in Hobbes, 87; Mill’s idea of, 298–299
false consciousness. See ideological con-
sciousness
family, as school for despotism, 298–299
feminism, in Mill, 316
feudalism, and surplus labor, 324, 325
Feuerbach, Ludwig: on religion, 361;
Marx’s thesis on, 361
fidelity: as rational, 69; principle of, 112,
126
Filmer, Robert, 106, 116, 119, 133, 187; po-
litical power based in Adam’s paternal
authority, 127; on political obligation,
132; doctrine of natural subjection, 132;
Locke’s reply to, on property, 142–150;
on Adam’s property in all the world, 144
final desires, in Butler, 441
fool, the, Hobbes’s argument contra, 68–69
forced labor, wage relation as, 344
franchise, extent of in Locke, 140–141
free and equal persons: consent of, origi-
nates political power, 126; in justice as
fairness, 269n
freedom: state of nature as state of free
-
dom in Locke, 115; our equal capacity
for (Rousseau), 219; three forms of,
220–221; when not in conflict with
equality, 233; and social contract, 241–
244; Rousseau on being forced to, 242,
243–244; of association, 288, 304; of
thought, 302, 304; of discussion, and
discovery of truth, 302–303; natural,
Sidgwick’s criticism of, 391–392
freely associated producers (Marx), 355n,
356; two stages of society of, 359; soci-
ety of, 362–363; absence of alienation,
362–364
free-riding, 243–244
free will (Rousseau), 197, 215, 243; and
acting on reasons, 217–218, 219; as ca-
pacity for deliberative reason, 223; and
general will, 234; and moral freedom,
243
Frege, Gottlob, 192
French Revolution, 193
fundamental interests: in Hobbes, 34, 46,
55, 62, 67, 105; in self-preservation, con-
jugal affection, and means of commodi-
ous living (Hobbes), 42, 46, 70; com-
mon to everyone, 48; limit social
contract, 129; of parties to Rousseau’s
social contract, 217–218; of citizens,
make possible common interests of
general will, 225, 228, 230, 236; deter-
mined by human nature, 225–226, 228;
in freedom and independence, 243; in
Mill, 289
Fundamental Law of Nature (Locke), 109,
112–115; grounded in God’s authority,
110–111; stated, 113; associates all man-
kind into one natural community, 114;
connected with reason, freedom, and
general good, 115; content of, 117–118;
as basis of natural rights, 118–121; and
natural right of property, 119; as distrib-
utive principle, 120; bounds political
power, 125; duty to safeguard the inno-
cent, 126; as basic law, 127; two natural
[ 464 ]
Index
Copyright © The President and Fellows of Harvard College
EXAM COPY
EXAM COPY
EXAM COPY
EXAM COPY
EXAM COPY
EXAM COPY
EXAM COPY