?'able
3.2.2.
Dctails
of
dcsign. nia1eri:ll, rcscrvoi'r, po\vcr house,
and
labour
for
thc
example
of
Danicl Jolinson
multiple
arch
tiam
(Ci~nad;~)
*)
-
--
\\'eight of concrctc: 6 .
lo6
tons.
1'0
obtain complccc :;ccurity of the d:lni
on
its foundation,
it
wns
necessary to cxcavntc bclow thc ccnrral arch
a
gorgc
40
ni dccp and
20
m
\vide.
To
sccurc ;tnd control
thc safety of thc foundation and thc supporting soil,
inspection
g;lllcrics havc bccn drilled in thc
adjacent rock. Similar p;ovision has been niadc in the concrctc. Morcovcr, itny displacement of thc
dam is continuously
controlled
by land survcying.
Total volume of concrctc used: 2.25. 10' m3.
Compression
rcsistancc: 316 bar ovcr 91 days.
Composition of colicrcte
Ccment 230 kglm3, Wclding sand 360 kg/m3
Stoncs in the rangc 75- 150 mm diarnctcr 360 kg/n13
Stones in the rangc 37,5-75 nim diamctcr 535 kg/m3
Stones in the
ranse 18.8-37,5 mrn Jiametcr 232 kg/m3
Stones in the rangc 9,4- 18.8 mm 148 kg/m3
Watcr 113 kg/rn3, additives for absorption of air 3,6 kg/1n3
Reservoir of the Daniel Johnson dam:
Surface: 2100
km2, length 200 km, total volume 133 km3,
storage volumc 36 km3, catchment
area 29000 km2.
Spillway: Height
21,3 m, width 440 m, nurnbcr of gates
3.
Volume of concrete
38
500 m3, flood flow 2830 m3,s.
Powcr station: Installed power capacity 1768
MW,
annual work 7,36 TWh,
number of sets 8. Francis turbines, net hcad 150 m,
rated discharge 642
m3/s, power station load factor 0,635.
Voitages- terminal 13,s kV, transmission to switchyard 3 15 kV,
long distance transmission 735 kV, (the first power station in the world using this voltage at the time
of its inauguration in 1970).
Admission: 4 gates, dimension
11
m 6,1 m,
number of galleries 2, diameter of galleries
I I
m,
length I100 m, maximum dischargc 960 m3/s.
Production of
concrete during the
erection:
hlonthly 105000 m3, %eekly
25
500 n13, dailv 4900 m3 (maximum values rcached).
Pressure shaft: number 8, diamcier 4560 mni, length
of
liner 176 m.
Labour involved:
hlan hours durins construction of the dam 31 350000,
totdl number of workers 12900, nurnbcr of workcrs during peak of construction 3544 in 1964,
number of
men, women children libing at site at peak of construction 4700.
*)
From special issue
of
Hydro Quebec, itlontrcal,
Canada
3.2.6.
Response
of
present society
to
social and ecological
impacts
of dams
There
is
no
doubt that the primary effects
of
the vast majority
of
dams have been
beneficial. Equally, however, there is no doubt,
that many
of
these dams have contributed
to unanticipated
zdverse secondary effects, many
of
which
could
have
been
eliminated by
a
proper planning process
[3.42].
In addition, there seems to be
a
considerable difference
of
opinion
in judei~ig the
success
or failure
of
some
projects.
The environmental
damages arising from the construction
of
dams are many, and they
have far
reachins effects, their interactions are often
so
complex and
so
little understood
that ecologists and environmentalists cannot predict them with certainty. Our current
knowledge of the eco-system
of
manmade lakes leaves much to be desired. According to
Bislcas
[3.42],
e.S. low water levels caused by the construction
of
a
dam msy result in
serious
consequelices to the
local
fauna and flora.