hazard. Mainly, scientists affirm that the lesson of
asbestos is to be learned and that a principle of
precaution is to be adopted.
Moreover, as said in the editorial of Nature
[25]: ‘Nano-technology is set to be the next cam-
paign focus for environmental groups’, which
enhances that research has not only to be per-
formed in the field of nano-toxicology, but also
that scientists have to comm unicate about it in
order to make it acceptable for a massive use in
society. For example, the European Union funded
the NANOSAFE project to assess the techn-
ology’s environmental and health risks in 2003,
and at the same time the US Environmental
Protection Agency invited proposals to study
the environmental and health impact of nano-
technology. Similarly, the Royal Society and the
Royal Academy of Engineering began some UK
studies in 2004. In Denmark, the Ministry of
Science, Technology and Innovation issued an
action plan including attention to health hazards,
environmental and ethical considerations regard-
ing nano-science and nano-technology, in 2004.
In the USA, a study about the military environ-
mental-health considerations has been reported
in [24]. In this study the potential use and impact
are listed and research priorities are highlighted.
Again, the mechanisms of the absorption of nano-
particles into the body and the reaction from the
immune system are considered as critical areas to
prevent or reduce risks, toget her with pollution-
related issues (e.g. the disposal and recycling of
carbon nano-tubes).
REFERENCES
[1] M. Hauschild, J. Jeswiet, L. Alting, From life cycle
assessment to sustainable production: status and per-
spectives, Annals of CIRP 54 (2) (2005) 535–555.
[2] ISO 14040: http://www.iso-14001.org.uk/iso-14040.
htm. (1999).
[3] A. De Grave, S.I. Olsen, Challenging the sustainabil-
ity of micro products development, Proceedings of
the 2nd International Conference on Multi-material
Micro Manufacturing (4M 2006), Grenoble, France
(September 2006) 285–288.
[4] A. De Grave, H.N. Hansen, S.I. Olsen, Sustainability
of products based on micro and nano technologies,
Proceedings of the 4th International Symposium on
Nanomanufacturing (ISNM 2006), MIT, Cam-
bridge, MA USA (November 2006) 40–45.
[5] K. Schischke, H. Griese, Is small green? Life Cycle
Aspects of Technology Trends in Microelectronicss
and Microsystems (2004). http://www.lcacenter.org/
InLCA2004/papers/Schischke_K_paper.pdf.
[6] A. Plepys, The environmental impacts of electronics.
Going beyond the walls of semiconductor fabs, IEEE
International Symposium on Electronics and the
Environment (2004) Conference Record.
[7] R. Kuehr, E. Williams (eds.). Computers and the En-
vironment: Understanding and Managing their
Impacts, Kluwer Academic Publications, Dordrecht
(2003).
[8] M. Hauschild, H. Wenzel, L. Alting, Life cycle
design – a route to the sustainable industrial culture?
Annals of CIRP 48 (1) (1997) 393–396.
[9] T. Gutowski, C. Murphy, D. Allen, D. Bauer, B. Bras,
T. Piwonka, P. Sheng, J. Sutherland, D. Thurston, E.
Wolff, Environmentally benign manufacturing: ob-
servations from Japan, Europe and the United States,
J. of Cleaner Production 13 (2005) 1–17.
[10] B. Hill, Industry’s integration of environmental
product design, IEEE International Symposium on
Electronics and the Environment (1993).
[11] ISO/TR 14062, Environmental management – integ-
rating environmental aspects into product design and
development, International Organisat ion for Stan-
dardisation, Geneva, Switzerland (2002).
[12] F. Quella and W.-P. Schmidt, Integrating environ-
mental aspects into product design and develop-
ment – the new ISO TR 14602 – Part 2 Contents
and practical solutions, gate to EHS: life cycle man-
agement – design for environment (Mar. 17, 2003)
1-7.
[13] H. Van Brussel, J. Peirs, D. Reynaerts, A. Delcham-
bre, G. Reinhart, N. Roth, M. Weck, E. Zussman,
Assembly of Microsystems, Annals of CIRP 49 (2)
(2000) 451–472.
[14] J.R. Sarusua, J. Pouyet, Recycling effects on micro-
structure and mechanical behaviour of PEEK short
carbon-fibre composites, J. of Material Science 32 (2)
533–536.
[15] O. Breuer, U. Sundararaj, Big returns from small
fibers: a review of polymer/carbon nanotube com-
posite, Polymer Composites 25 (6) (2004) 630–
645.
[16] E.V. Barrera, L.P.F. Chibante, B. Collins, F.
Rodriguez-Marcias, M. Shofner, J.D. Kim, F.D.S.
Marquis, Recycling nanotubes from polymer nano-
composite (2001) 267–282. In: Powder Materials:
Current Research and Industrial Practices.
[17] B. Muruyama, K. Alam, SAMPE J 38 (3) (May/June
2002) 59.
[18] H.N. Hansen, T.E. Eriksson, M. Arentoft, N. Paldan,
Design rules for microfactory solutions, Proceedings
CHAPTER 25 Sustainability of Micro-Manufacturing Technologies 403