PFE Chapter 12, Appendix: The efficient frontier with more than two assets Page 3
your willingness to trade off return for additional risk.
1
What may surprise you,
however, is that we can say a lot about how not to invest. In this chapter we develop the
notion of the efficient frontier—this is the set of all portfolios that you would consider as
investment portfolios. Inherent in the concept of the efficient frontier is that there are
many portfolios that are not good investments, and that these portfolios can be somehow
described (statistically).
• How do you maximize your return without losing money? To some extent the efficient
frontier answers this question: It shows us which portfolios are so bad that you can
improve both the return and the risk. Once we’ve gotten on the efficient frontier,
however, the risk-return tradeoff begins to operate, and higher returns mean larger risks.
2
In most of this chapter we examine the risk and return of portfolios composed of two
financial assets. By choosing a combination of the two assets, you can achieve significant
reductions in risk.
3
Much of the chapter relies on the statistics for portfolios discussed in the
previous chapter. Even our main example, which considers portfolios of General Motors (GM)
and Microsoft (MSFT) stock, is one we started in Chapter 11.
1
As you learned in Chapter 10, nearly all the interesting finance questions involve the word “risk.” Portfolio choice
is no different!
2
As the author’s father used to say: “It is better to be rich and healthy than poor and sick.” The investment
interpretation of this is that we would all like to have more return and risk less. The efficient frontier represents the
set of difficult investment choices: Once you’re on the efficient frontier, it is impossible to get more return without
taking on more risk.
3
Of course in the real world there are many investment assets. We use the two-asset case to develop the requisite
intuitions and ask you to take it on faith that the multi-asset case is similar.