studied the surface contamination of abraded titanium. Despite low grinding speeds
and water cooling, the abraded surfaces were found to be contaminated by abrasive
constituent elements. Element analysis and chemical bond state analysis of the con-
taminants were performed using an electron probe microanalyzer. X-ray diffraction
of the abraded surface was performed to identify the contaminants. It was reported
that (i) the contamination of titanium is related to its reactivity as well as its hard-
ness, (ii) in spite of water cooling and slow–speed abrading, titanium surfaces were
obviously contaminated, (iii) contaminant deposits with dimensions ranging from
about 10 to 30 m occurred throughout the surfaces, and (iv) the contaminant of
titanium, although related also to the hardness, resulted primarily from a reaction
with abrasive materials, and such contamination could negatively influence tita-
nium’s resistance to corrosion and its biocompatibility [11-12].
Normally, fine alumina particles (50 m Al
2
O
3
) are recycled within the sandblast-
ing machine. Ceramics such as alumina are brittle in nature, therefore some portions
of recycled alumina might be brittle-fractured. If fractured sand blasting particles are
involved in the recycling media, it might result in irregular surfaces, as well as poten-
tial contamination. Using fractal dimension analysis [11-13–11-15], a sample plate
surface was weekly analyzed in terms of topographic changes, as well as chemical
analysis of sampled recycled Al
2
O
3
particles. It was found that after accumulated use
time exceeded 30 min, the fractal dimension (D
F
) [11-13] remained a constant value
of about 1.4, prior to that it continuously increased from 1.25 to 1.4. By the electron
probe microanalysis on collected blasting particles, unused Al
2
O
3
contains 100% Al,
whereas used (accumulated usage time was about 2400 s) particles contained Al
(83.32 wt%), Ti (5.48), Ca (1.68), Ni (1.36), Mo (1.31), S (1.02), Si (0.65), P (0.55),
Mn (0.49), K (0.29), Cl (0.26), and V (0.08), strongly indicating that used alumina
powder was heavily contaminated, and a high risk for the next material surface to be
contaminated. Such contaminants are from previously blasted materials having vari-
ous chemical compositions, and investing materials as well [11-16].
There are several evidences of surface contamination due to mechanical abra-
sive actions. As a metallographic preparation, the surface needs to be mechanically
polished with a metallographic paper (which is normally SiC-adhered paper)
under running water [11-17, 11-18]. It is worth mentioning here that polishing
paper should be changed between different types of materials, and particularly
when a dissimilar metal-couple is used for galvanic corrosion tests, such couple
should not be polished prior to corrosion testing because both materials could
become cross-contaminated [11-18]. Hence, there are attempts to use TiO
2
pow-
der for blasting onto titanium material surfaces. It was reported that titanium sur-
faces were sandblasted using TiO
2
powder (particle size ranging from 45, 45–63,
and 63–90 m) to produce the different surface textures prior to fibroblast cell
attachment [11-19].
316 Bioscience and Bioengineering of Titanium Materials
Else_BBTM-OSHIDA_CH011.qxd 10/6/2006 10:29 AM Page 316