288 PARABOLIC EQUATIONS
is simply f'(u), remains positive, the maximum principle applies, and the problem
is well posed. But then there is no change of phase. To get different phases the
solution must contain regions where u is near both ±1, and hence, in places, u
takes values for which f' < 0, the so-called `spinodal' region. In this region, the
equation is a backward heat equation, and if the initial data is also spinodal the
problem is ill-posed. We comment that, for times before the blow-up that would
generally occur in the spinodal region, maxima tend to increase and minima to
decrease. Thus u changes so that it abhors the spinodal region and takes values
that increasingly correspond to phase separation.
In any event, (6.102) needs to be regularised, and one way in which this can
be done is by including a higher-order term with the correct sign, and one such
regularised equation is
8u
= V2f (u) -
e2V4tL,
8t
where a is a small constant. This fourth-order parabolic equation is called the
Cahn-Hilliard equation, and the final biharmonic term can be identified with the
energy density contained in the surface of the interface between the phases. The
reason for the choice of sign, and, indeed, a guide to the well-posedness of such an
equation, is given by considering a linear one-dimensional problem with oscillatory
initial data in the spirit of §3.1. Consider
s
a ax2
-
e2 8x4
for t > 0
with
u (x, 0) = sin nx. (6.103)
This has the solution u(x,t) = eatsinnx, with J = n2(1 - e2n2). Although low
wavenumbers in which n < 1/e give rise to temporal growth, solutions with high
wavenumbers with n > 1/e decay; the zero solution is unstable, which it was not
in the case of the heat equation, but there is no longer any indication of arbitrarily
rapid growth, as happens with the backward heat equation. Likewise, as long as a is
real, the term -e2V4u in the Cahn-Hilliard equation acts to limit rapid variations
of u, confirming the expectation that the material reduces its interfacial energy.
The lack of stability to low wavenumber perturbations is a clear indication that
there is no maximum principle for this particular equation. Although instability
and the failure of the maximum principle for (6.103) result from the -82u/8x2
term, the maximum principle in fact also fails for 8u/8t = -84u/8x4, as we can
see by taking
and
u=105-24t>0 forx=±3,0<t<2
u=x4+24>0
att=0for-3<, x<3,
so that the fourth-order equation has solution u = x4 + 24(1 - t). This is positive
for 0 S t < 1 and is negative in an expanding interval for 1 < t < 2.
Note that, although Green's functions and transform methods can, in principle,
be applied to parabolic equations of any order, terms like a-p'/4
would appear
when we tried, say, a Laplace transform in time on a fourth-order linear equation.
This makes the inversion more unwieldy than for the heat equation.