12.9 Properties of Laplace Transforms 465
Theorem 12.9.5. (Integration)If
¯
f (s) is the Laplace transform of f (t),
then
L
t
0
f (τ) dτ
=
¯
f (s) /s.
Proof.
L
t
0
f (τ) dτ
=
∞
0
t
0
f (τ) dτ
e
−st
dt
=
−
e
−st
s
t
0
f (τ) dτ
∞
0
+
1
s
∞
0
f (t) e
−st
dt
=
¯
f (s) /s
since
t
0
f (τ) dτ is of exponential order.
In solving problems by the Laplace transform method, the difficulty
arises in finding inverse transforms. Although the inversion formula ex-
ists, its evaluation requires a knowledge of functions of complex variables.
However, for some problems of mathematical physics, we need not use this
inversion formula. We can avoid its use by expanding a given transform by
the method of partial fractions in terms of simple fractions in the trans-
form variables. With these simple functions, we refer to the table of Laplace
transforms given in the end of the book and obtain the inverse transforms.
Here, we should note that we use the assumption that there is essentially a
one-to-one correspondence between functions and their Laplace transforms.
This may be stated as follows:
Theorem 12.9.6. (Lerch)Letf and g be piecewise continuous functions
of exponential order. If there exists a constant s
0
, such that L[f]=L[g]
for all s>s
0
, then f (t)=g (t) for all t>0 except possibly at the points
of discontinuity.
For a proof, the reader is referred to Kreider et al. (1966).
In order to find a solution of linear partial differential equations, the
following formulas and results are useful.
If L{u (x, t)} =
u (x , s), then
L
∂u
∂t
= s
u (x , s) − u (x, 0) ,
L
∂
2
u
∂t
2
= s
2
u (x , s) − su(x, 0) − u
t
(x, 0) ,
and so on.
Similarly, it is easy to show that