414 Chapter 10
loop, resulting in a lower concentration of ammonia in the recycle gas. Since the
maximum conversion of the synthesis gas to ammonia is limited by the thermo-
dynamics of the reaction, the lower concentration of ammonia in the recycle gas
led to an overall increase in the conversion of synthesis gas to ammonia. It also
became possible to operate with a smaller converter, and still maintain the same
level of production. By the 1960s, refrigeration had become essential when op-
erating the low-pressure ammonia converters, as the equilibrium concentration
of ammonia at 50-bar pressure is only about 12%, and the concentration of am-
monia in the recycle gas was reduced to about 2%.
10.1.4.2 Converter Design
The majority of early ammonia plants used adiabatic beds of catalyst or tube-
cooled converters that acted like a heat exchanger with the cold synthesis gas
passing through the tubes to cool the catalyst. Tube-cooled reactors, such as
those introduced by the Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA), did not operate iso-
thermally and the exothermic reaction led to both axial and radial temperature
profiles developing. The temperature difference depended on the number of
tubes passing through the catalyst bed.
The converter design took this into ac-
count by maximizing the number of tubes although the temperature profile could
only be controlled by changing the inlet gas temperature. There were problems
in loading catalyst into the space between tubes to achieve the right packing
density as well as in discharging catalyst when it was deactivated. Large tube-
cooled converters were also expensive.
Modern converters are designed with several catalyst beds in which the hot
Quench cooling has usually been preferred in plants using multi-bed converters
some of the catalyst with a significant volume of the synthesis gas. The same
Problems were experienced in wide, multi-bed converters, with gas flowing
axially through the beds, because big catalyst particles were required to limit the
pressure drop through the catalyst. Since activity is inversely proportional to
increased the capital cost of a plant. By designing converters in such a way that
gas flowed radially through the catalyst bed, it was possible to decrease the
overall pressure drop and to use smaller catalyst particles that did not suffer
from the limitations of pore diffusion to the same extent, and thus showed great-
er activity per unit volume.
Gas distribution problems in the top bed—
resulting from a low-pressure drop—were overcome by the use of an improved
converter design. In one case, an axial-radial flow system was used. In another,
26
27
gas can be cooled at each bed exit either by heat exchange or by the addition of
particle size, increased volumes of catalyst were needed and the large reactors
cold synthesis gas, often referred to as quench cooling (Figures 10.6 and 10.7).
process is detailed for a three or four bed operation is shown in Table 10.6.
despite the disadvantage of using a larger catalyst volume and having to by-pass