Korb K.B., Nicholson A.E. Bayesian Artificial Intelligence

Подождите немного. Документ загружается.

[105] Helm, S. The use of computer games to improve understanding about decimal

notation, 2002. Honours thesis, University of Melbourne.

[106] Henrion, M. Propagating uncertainty in Bayesian networks by logic sampling.

In Uncertainty in Artiﬁcial Intelligence Vol 2,J.LemmerandL.Kanal,Eds.

North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1988, pp. 149–163.

[107] Henrion, M., Pradhan, M., Del Favero, B., Huang, K., Provan, G., and

O’Rorke, P. Why is diagnosis using belief networks insensitive to impre-

cision in probabilities? In UAI96 – Proceedings of the Twelfth Conference on

Uncertainty in Artiﬁcial Intelligence (1996), pp. 307–314.

[108] Henze, N., and Nejdl, W. Bayesian modeling for adaptive hypermedia sys-

tems. In Proceedings of ABIS99, 7. GI-Workshop Adaptivitt und Benutzer-

modellierung in interaktiven Softwaresystemen (1999).

[109] Hope, L., Nicholson, A., and Korb, K. Knowledge engineering tools for

probability elicitation. Technical report, School of Computer Science and

Software Engineering, Monash University, 2002.

[110] Hope, L. R., and Korb, K. B. Bayesian information reward. Lecture Notes in

Computer Science 2557 (2002), 272–280.

[111] Horvitz, E., and Barry, M. Display of information for time-critical decision

making. In UAI95 – Proceedings of the Eleventh Conference on Uncertainty

in Artiﬁcial Intelligence (San Francisco, 1995), P. Besnard and S. Hanks, Eds.,

pp. 296–305.

[112] Horvitz, E., Breese, J., Heckerman, D., Hovel, D., and Rommelse, K. The

Lumiere project: Bayesian user modeling for inferring the goals and needs

of software users. In UAI’98 – Proceedings of the Fourteenth Conference on

Uncertainty in Artiﬁcial Intelligence (San Mateo, CA, 1999), Morgan Kauf-

mann, pp. 256–265.

[113] Horvitz, E., Suermondt, H., and Cooper, G. Bounded conditioning: Flexible

inference for decisions under scarce resources. In Proceedings of the Fifth

Workshop on Uncertainty in Artiﬁcial Intelligence (1989), pp. 182–193.

[114] Houghton, D. Wind Strategy. Fernhurst Books, Brighton, East Sussex, 1992.

[115] Howard, R., and Matheson, J. Inﬂuence diagrams. In Readings in Decision

Analysis, R. Howard and J. Matheson, Eds. Strategic Decisions Group, Menlo

Park, CA, 1981, pp. 763–771.

[116] Howson, C. The logical basis of uncertainty. In Foundations of Bayesianism,

D. Corﬁeld and J. Williamson, Eds. Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, 2001.

[117] Howson, C., and Urbach, P. Scientiﬁc Reasoning: The Bayesian Approach,

2nd ed. Open Court, La Salle, IL, 1993.

[118] Hume, D. A Treatise of Human Nature. World Publishing, Cleveland,

1739/1962.

[119] Husmeier, D., Roberts, S., and Dybowski, R., Eds. Applications of Probabilis-

tic Modelling in Medical Informatics and Bioinformatics. Springer, London,

2003.

[120] Innocent. Innocent: Fighting miscarriages of justice, 2002.

http://www.innocent.org.uk.

[121] Jaakkola, T. S., and Jordan, M. I. Variational probabilistic inference and the

QMR-DT network. Journal of Artiﬁcial Intelligence Research 10 (1999),

291–322.

[122] Jaynes, E. Prior probabilities. IEEE Transactions on Systems Science and

Cybernetics SSC-4 (1968), 227–241.

[123] Jeffrey, R. The Logic of Decision, second ed. McGraw-Hill, New York, 1983.

[124] Jensen, F. Junction trees and decomposable hypergraphs. Technical report,

Judex Datasystemer A/S, Aalborg, Denmark, 1988.

[125] Jensen, F., Lauritzen, S., and Olesen, K. Bayesian updating in causal proba-

bilistic networks by local computations. Computational Statistics Quarterly

4 (1990), 269–282.

[126] Jensen, F., Olesen, J., and Kjærulff, U. Mildew network. http://www-

nt.cs.berkeley.edu/home/nir/public

html/Repository/mildew.htm.

[127] Jensen, F., Olesen, K., and Andersen, S. An algebra of Bayesian belief uni-

verses for knowledge bases systems. Networks 20 (1990), 637–659.

[128] Jensen, F. V. Bayesian Networks and Decision Graphs. Springer, New York.

[129] Jensen, F. V. An Introduction to Bayesian Networks. Springer, New York,

1996.

[130] Jensen, F. V., Chamberlain, B., Nordahl, T., and Jensen, F. Analysis in

HUGIN of data conﬂict. In Uncertainty in Artiﬁcial Intelligence 6,P.P.

Bonissone, M. Henrion, L. M. Kanal, and J. F. Lemmer, Eds. Elsevier, 1991,

pp. 519–528.

[131] Jensen, F. V., Kjærulff, U., Olesen, K. G., and Pedersen, J. Et forprojekt til et

ekspertsystem for drift af spildevandsrensning (a prototype expert system for

control of waste water treatment). Technical report, Judex Datasystemer A/S,

Aalborg, Denmark, 1989. In Danish.

[132] Jitnah, N. Bayesian poker. Honours thesis, Dept. of Computer Science,

Monash University, 1993.

[133] Jitnah, N. Using Mutual Information for Approximate Evaluation of Bayesian

Networks. PhD thesis, Monash University, School of Computer Science and

Software Engineering, 2000.

[134] Jordan, M. An introduction to linear algebra in parallel distributed processing.

In Parallel Distributed Processing, Vol. 1.,J.M.D.E.Rumelhardandthe

PDP research group, Eds. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1986, pp. 365–422.

[135] Jordan, M., Ed. Learning in Graphical Models. MIT, Cambridge, MA, 1999.

[136] K. B. Korb, R. M. I. Z. A cognitive model of argumentation. In Proceedings

of the Cognitive Science Society Meeting (1997), pp. 400–405.

[137] Kahneman, D., and Tversky, A. On the psychology of prediction. Psycholog-

ical Review 80 (1973), 430–454.

[138] Kalman, R. A new approach to linear ﬁltering and prediction problems. Trans.

ASME, J. Basic Engineering 82 (March 1960), 34–45.

[139] Kanazawa, K. Probability, Time, and Action. PhD thesis, Brown University,

Providence, RI, 1992.

[140] Kanazawa, K., Koller, D., and Russell, S. Stochastic simulation algorithms

for dynamic probabilistic networks. In UAI95 – Proceedings of the Eleventh

Conference on Uncertainty in Artiﬁcial Intelligence (San Francisco, 1995),

P. Besnard and S. Hanks, Eds., pp. 346–351.

[141] Karzanov, A., and Khachiyan, L. On the conductance of order Markov chains.

Technical Report DIMACS 90-60, Dept. of Computer Science, Rutgers, 1990.

[142] Kennett, R., Korb, K., and Nicholson, A. Seabreeze prediction using Bayesian

networks. In PAKDD’01 – Proceedings of the Fourth Paciﬁc-Asia Conference

on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (Hong Kong, 2001), pp. 148–153.

[143] Kennett, R., Korb, K., and Nicholson, A. Seabreeze prediction using Bayesian

networks: A case study. Technical Report TR 2001/86, School of Computer

Science and Software Engineering, Monash University, 2001.

[144] Kim, J., and Pearl, J. A computational model for causal and diagnostic rea-

soning in inference systems. In Proceedings of the Eighth International Joint

Conference on Artiﬁcial Intelligence (IJCAI) (1983), pp. 190–193.

[145] Kim, Y., and Valtorta, M. On the detection of conﬂicts in diagnostic Bayesian

networks. In UAI95 – Proceedings of the Eleventh Conference on Uncertainty

in Artiﬁcial Intelligence (San Francisco, 1995), P. Besnard and S. Hanks, Eds.,

pp. 362–367.

[146] Kipersztok, O., and Wang, H. Another look at sensitivity of Bayesian net-

works to imprecise probabilities. In Proceedings of the Eighth Workshop on

Artiﬁcial Intelligence and Statistics (AISTAT-2001) (Florida, 2001).

[147] Kjærulff, U. A computational scheme for reasoning in dynamic probabilistic

networks. In UAI92 – Proceedings of the Eighth Conference on Uncertainty

in Artiﬁcial Intelligence (1992), pp. 121–129.

[148] Kjærulff, U. Reduction of computation complexity in Bayesian networks

through removal of weak dependencies. In UAI94 – Proceedings of the Tenth

Conference on Uncertainty in Artiﬁcial Intelligence (San Francisco, 1994),

L. de Mantras and D. Poole, Eds., pp. 374–382.

[149] Kjærulff, U. dHugin: A computationalsystem for dynamictime-sliced Bayes-

ian networks. International Journal of Forecasting, Special Issue on Proba-

bility Forecasting 11 (1995), 89–111.

[150] Kjærulff, U., and van der Gaag, L. C. Making sensitivity analysis computa-

tionally efﬁcient. In Proceedings of the Sixteenth Conference on Uncertainty

in Artiﬁcial Intelligence (2000), C. Boutilier and M. Goldszmidt, Eds., Mor-

gan Kaufmann, San Mateo, CA, pp. 317–325.

[151] Koller, D., and Pfeffer, A. Object-oriented Bayesian networks. In UAI97 –

Proceedings of the Thirteenth Conference on Uncertainty in Artiﬁcial Intelli-

gence (1997), D. Geiger and P. Shenoy, Eds., pp. 302–313.

[152] Koller, D., and Pfeffer, A. Representations and solutions for game-theoretic

problems. Artiﬁcial Intelligence 94 (1997), 167–215.

[153] Kolmogorov, A. Grundbegriffe der Warhscheinlichkeitsrechnung. Springer,

Berlin, 1933.

[154] Kolmogorov, A. N. Three approaches to the quantitative deﬁnition of infor-

mation. Problems of Information and Transmission 1 (1965), 1–7.

[155] Kononenko, I., and Bratko, I. Information-based evaluation criterion for clas-

siﬁer’s performance. Machine Learning 6 (1991), 67–80.

[156] Korb, K. Searle’s Artiﬁcial Intelligence program. Journal of Theoretical and

Experimental Artiﬁcial Intelligence 3 (1991), 283–296.

[157] Korb, K., Hope, L., and Hughes, M. The evaluation of predictive learners:

some theoretical and empirical results. In Proceedings of the 12th Euro-

pean Conference on Machine Learning (Heidelberg, 2001), Springer-Verlag,

pp. 276–287.

[158] Korb, K., McConachy, R., and Zukerman, I. A cognitive model of argumen-

tation. In Proceedings of the Nineteenth Annual Conference of the Cognitive

Science Society (1997), pp. 400–405.

[159] Korb, K. B. Inductive learning and defeasible inference. Journal for Experi-

mental and Theoretical Artiﬁcial Intelligence 7 (1995), 291–324.

[160] Korb, K. B., Nicholson, A. E., and Jitnah, N. Bayesian poker. In UAI99 – Pro-

ceedings of the Fifteenth Conference on Uncertainty in Artiﬁcial Intelligence

(Sweden, 1999), Laskey and Prade, Eds., pp. 343–350.

[161] Korb, K. B., and Wallace, C. S. In search of the philosopher’s stone: Remarks

on Humphreys and Freedman’s critique of causal discovery. The British Jour-

nal for the Philosophy of Science 48 (1997), 543–553.

[162] Kornfeld, A. Causal diagrams. Artiﬁcial Intelligence Expert (November

1991).

[163] Kuikka, S., Hilden, M., Gislason, H., Hanson, S., Sparholt, H., and Varis, O.

Modeling environmentaly driven uncertainties in Baltic cod (Gadus morhua):

Management by Bayesian inﬂuence diagrams. Canadian Journal of Fisheries

and Aquatic Sciences 54 (1999), 629–641.

[164] Lacave, C., Atienza, R., and D´ıez, F. J. Graphical explanation in Bayesian

networks. Lecture Notes in Computer Science 1933 (2000), 122–129.

[165] Lam, W., and Bacchus, F. Learning Bayesian belief networks: An approach

based on the MDL principle. Computational Intelligence 10 (1993), 269–293.

[166] Laskey, K., and Mahoney, S. Network engineering for agile belief network

models. IEEE: Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering 12,4

(2000), 487–498.

[167] Laskey, K. B. Sensitivity analysis for probability assessments in Bayesian

networks. In UAI93 – Proceedings of the Ninth Conference on Uncertainty

in Artiﬁcial Intelligence (Washington, DC, 1993), Heckerman and Mamdani,

Eds., pp. 136–142.

[168] Lauritzen, S., and Wermuth, N. Graphical models for associations between

variables, some of which are qualitative and some quantitative. The Annals of

Statistics 17 (1989), 31–57.

[169] Lauritzen, S. L., and Spiegelhalter, D. J. Local computations with probabil-

ities on graphical structures and their application to expert systems. Journal

of the Royal Statistical Society 50, 2 (1988), 157–224.

[170] Lerner, U., Segal, E., and Koller, D. Exact inference in networks with dis-

crete children of continuous parents. In UAI01 – Proceedings of the Seven-

teenth Conference on Uncertainty in Artiﬁcial Intelligence (2001), Breese and

Koller, Eds., pp. 319–328.

[171] Lewis, D. A subjectivist’s guide to objective chance. In Studies in Inductive

Logic and Probability, Volume II (1980), Jeffrey, Ed., University of Califor-

nia, pp. 263–293.

[172] Lin, Y., and Druzdzel, M. Computational advantages of relevance reason-

ing in Bayesian belief networks. In UAI97 – Proceedings of the Thirteenth

Conference on Uncertainty in Artiﬁcial Intelligence (San Francisco, 1997),

D. Geiger and P. Shenoy, Eds., pp. 342–350.

[173] Lindley, D. Bayesian Statistics, A Review. Society for Industrial and Applied

Mathematics, Philadelphia, 1972.

[174] Loehlin, J. C. Latent Variable Models: An Introduction to Factor, Path, and

Structural Analysis, third ed. Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ, 1998.

[175] Luger, G., and Stubbleﬁeld, W. Artiﬁcial intelligence: Structures and Strate-

gies for Complex Problem Solving, second ed. Benjamin/Cummings, Menlo

Park, CA, 1993.

[176] Mackay, D. Introduction to Monte Carlo methods. In Learning in Graphical

Models, M. Jordan, Ed. MIT, Cambridge, MA, 1998, pp. 175–204.

[177] Madigan, D., Andersson, S. A., Perlman, M. D., and Volinsky, C. T. Bayes-

ian model averaging and model selection for Markov equivalence classes of

acyclic digraphs. Communications in Statistics: Theory and Methods 25

(1996), 2493–2519.

[178] Madigan, D., Mosurski, K., and Almond, R. G. Graphical explanation in

belief networks. Journal of Computer and Graphical Statistics 6 (1997), 160–

181.

[179] Madigan, D., and Raftery, A. E. Model selection and accounting for model

uncertainty in graphical models using Occam’s window. Journal of the Amer-

ican Statistical Association 89 (1994), 1535–1546.

[180] Madigan, D., and York, I. Bayesian graphical models for discrete data. Inter-

national Statistical Review 63 (1995), 215–232.

[181] Mahoney, S., and Laskey, K. Representing and combining partially speciﬁed

CPTs. In UAI99 – Proceedings of the Fifteenth Conference on Uncertainty in

Artiﬁcial Intelligence (Sweden, 1999), Laskey and Prade, Eds., pp. 343–350.

[182] Marcot, B. A process for creating bayesian belief network models of species-

environment relations. Technical report, USDA Forest Service, Portland, Ore-

gon, 1999.

[183] Marcot, B. G., Holthausen, R. S., Raphael, M. G., Rowland, M., and Wisdom,

M. Using Bayesian belief networks to evaluate ﬁsh and wildlife population

viability. Forest Ecology and Management 153, 1-3 (2001), 29–42.

[184] Mayo, M., and Mitrovic, A. Optimising ITS behaviour with Bayesian net-

works and decision theory. International Journal of Artiﬁcial Intelligence in

Education 12 (2001), 124–153.

[185] McDermott, D. A critique of pure reason. Computational Intelligence 3

(1987), 151–237.

[186] McGowan, R. D. Ambulation monitoring and fall detection using dynamic

belief networks. honours thesis. dept. of electrical and computer systems en-

gineering, monash university. 1997.

[187] McIntosh, J., Stacey, K., Tromp, C., and Lightfoot, D. Designing construc-

tivist computer games for teaching about decimal numbers. In Proceedings

of the Twenty Third Annual Conference of the Mathematical Education Re-

search Group of Australasia, J. Bana and A. Chapman, Eds. Freemantle,

2000, pp. 409–416.

[188] Meek, C., and Chickering, D. M. Practically perfect. In UAI03 – Proceedings

of the Nineteenth Conference on Uncertainty in AI (2003).

[189] Metropolis, N., Rosenbluth, A. W., Rosenbluth, M. N., Teller, A. H., and

Teller, E. Equations of state calculations by fast computing machines. Journal

of Chemical Physics 21 (1953), 1087–1091.

[190] Middleton, B., Shwe, M., Heckerman, D., Henrion, M., Horvitz, E.,

Lehmann, H., and Cooper, G. Probabilistic diagnosis using a reformulation

of the INTERNIST-1/QMR knowledge base II. Evaluation of diagnostic per-

formance. Methods in Information in Medicine 30 (1991), 256–267.

[191] Miller, A. C., Merkhofer, M. M., Howard, R. A., Matheson, J. E., and Rice,

T. R. Development of automated aids for decision analysis. Technical report,

SRI International, Menlo Park, CA, 1976.

[192] Mitchell, T. Machine Learning. McGraw-Hill, New York, 1997.

[193] Monti, S., and Cooper, G. F. A multivariate discretization method for learn-

ing hybrid Bayesian networks from data. In Proceedings of the Fourteenth

Conference on Uncertainty in Artiﬁcial Intelligence (UAI98) (Madison, WI,

1998), pp. 404–413.

[194] Morgan, M., and Henrion, M. Uncertainty: A Guide to Dealing with Uncer-

tainty in Quantitative Risk and Policy Analysis. Cambridge University Press,

London, 1990.

[195] Morjaria, M. A., Rink, F. J., Smith, W. D., Klempner, G., Burns, G., and

Stein, J. Commercialization of EPRI’s generator expert monitoring system.

In Proceedings of the EPRI Conference on Advanced Computer Applications

in the Electric Utility Industry (Phoenix, 1993).

[196] Mosteller, F. Statistics by Example. Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, 1973.

[197] Murphy, K., Weiss, Y., and Jordan, M. I. Loopy belief propagation for approx-

imate inference: an empirical study. In UAI99 – Proceedings of the Fifteenth

Conference on Uncertainty in Artiﬁcial Intelligence (Sweden, 1999), Laskey

and Prade, Eds., pp. 467–475.

[198] Murphy, K. P. Dynamic Bayesian Networks: Representation, Inference and

Learning. PhD thesis, Department of Computer Science, University of Cali-

fornia, Berkeley, 2002.

[199] Neapolitan, R. E. Probabilistic Reasoning in Expert Systems. Wiley and Sons,

New York, 1990.

[200] Neapolitan, R. E. Learning Bayesian Networks. Prentice Hall, New York,

2003.

[201] Neil, J. R., and Korb, K. B. The evolution of causal models. In Third Paciﬁc-

Asia Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Datamining (PAKDD-99)

(Heidelberg, 1999), N. Zhong and L. Zhous, Eds., Springer-Verlag, pp. 432–

437.

[202] Neil, J. R., Wallace, C. S., and Korb, K. B. Learning Bayesian networks

with restricted causal interactions. In UAI99 – Proceedings of the Fifteenth

Conference on Uncertainty in Artiﬁcial Intelligence (Sweden, 1999), Laskey

and Prade, Eds., pp. 486–493.

[203] Nicholson, A. Fall diagnosis using dynamic belief networks. In Proceedings

of the Fourth Paciﬁc Rim International Conference on Artiﬁcial Intelligence

(PRICAI-96) (1996), pp. 206–217.

[204] Nicholson, A., Boneh, T., Wilkin, T., Stacey, K., Sonenberg, L., and Steinle,

V. A case study in knowledge discovery and elicitation in an intelligent tu-

toring application. In UAI01 – Proceedings of the Seventeenth Conference on

Uncertainty in Artiﬁcial Intelligence (Seattle, 2001), Breese and Koller, Eds.,

pp. 386–394.

[205] Nicholson, A., and Jitnah, N. Belief network algorithms: a study of per-

formance using domain characterisation. Technical Report Technical Report

96/249, Department of Computer Science, Monash University, 1996.

[206] Nicholson, A. E. Monitoring Discrete Environments using Dynamic Belief

Networks. PhD thesis, Department of Engineering Sciences, Oxford, 1992.

[207] Nicholson, A. E., and Brady, J. M. The data association problem when

monitoring robot vehicles using dynamic belief networks. In ECAI92 – Pro-

ceedings of the Tenth European Conference on Artiﬁcial Intelligence (1992),

pp. 689–693.

[208] Nicholson, A. E., and Brady, J. M. Sensor validation using dynamic belief

networks. In UAI92 – Proceedings of the Eighth Conference on Uncertainty

in Artiﬁcial Intelligence (1992), pp. 207–214.

[209] Nikovski, D. Constructing Bayesian networks for medical diagnosis from

incomplete and partially correct statistics. IEEE: Transactions on Knowledge

and Data Engineering 12, 4 (2000), 509–516.

[210] Olesen, K. Causal probabilistic networks with both discrete and continuous

variables. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence

(PAMI) 15, 3 (1993), 275–279.

[211] Oliver, J. Decision graphs – an extension of decision trees. In Proceedings

Fourth International Conference on Artiﬁcial Intelligence (1993), pp. 343–

350.

[212] Onisko, A., Druzdzel, M., and Wasyluk, H. A probabilistic model for diagno-

sis of liver disorders. In Proceedings of the Seventh Symposium on Intelligent

Information Systems (IIS-98) (1998), pp. 379–387.

[213] Park, J. D. Map complexity results and approximation methods. In UAI02 –

Proceedings of the Eighteenth Conference on Uncertainty in Artiﬁcial Intelli-

gence (San Francisco, CA, 2002), Morgan Kaufmann, pp. 388–396.

[214] Pearl, J. An economic basis for certain methods of evaluating probabilistic

forecasts. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies 10 (1978), 175–

183.

[215] Pearl, J. Reverend Bayes on inference engines: a distributed hierarchical

approach. In AAAI82 – Proceedings of the Second National Conference on

Artiﬁcial Intelligence (San Mateo, CA, 1982), AAAI, Morgan Kaufmann,

pp. 133–136.

[216] Pearl, J. Fusion, propagation, and structuring in belief networks. Artiﬁcial

Intelligence 29 (1986), 241–288.

[217] Pearl, J. Probabilistic Reasoning in Intelligent Systems. Morgan Kaufmann,

San Mateo, CA, 1988.

[218] Pearl, J. Causality: Models, Reasoning and Inference. Cambridge, MA, 2000.

[219] Poole, D., Mackworth, A., and Goebel, R. Computational Intelligence: A

Logical Approach. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1999.

[220] Popper, K. The propensity interpretation of probability. British Journal for

the Philosophy of Science 10 (1959), 25–42.

[221] Pradhan, M., Henrion, M., Provan, G., Favero, B. D., and Huang, K. The

sensitivity of belief networks to imprecise probabilities: An experimental in-

vestigation. Artiﬁcial Intelligence 85, 1-2 (1996), 363–397.

[222] Pradhan, M., Provan, G., Middleton, B., and Henrion, M. Knowledge en-

gineering for large belief networks. In UAI94 – Proceedings of the Tenth

Conference on Uncertainty in Artiﬁcial Intelligence (San Francisco, 1994),

L. de Mantras and D. Poole, Eds., pp. 484–490.

[223] Promedas. http://www.mbfys.kun.nl/snn/Research/promedas.

[224] Provost, F., Fawcett, T., and Kohavi, R. The case against accuracy estimation

for comparing induction algorithms. In Proceedings of the Fifteenth Inter-

national Conference on Machine Learning (1998), Morgan Kaufmann, San

Francisco, CA, pp. 445–453.

[225] Pynadeth, D., and Wellman, M. P. Accounting for context in plan recognition,

with application to trafﬁc monitoring. In UAI95 – Proceedings of the Eleventh

Conference on Uncertainty in Artiﬁcial Intelligence (San Francisco, 1995),

P. Besnard and S. Hanks, Eds., pp. 472–481.

[226] Quinlan, J. Induction of decision trees. Machine Learning 5 (1986), 239–266.

[227] Quinlan, J. R. Learning decision tree classiﬁers. ACM Computing Surveys

28, 1 (Mar. 1996), 71–72.

[228] R. McConachy, K. B. K., and Zukerman, I. Deciding what not to say: An

attentional-probabilistic approach to argument presentation. In Proceedings

of the Cognitive Science Society Meeting (1998), pp. 669–674.

[229] Raiffa, H. Decision Analysis: Introductory Lectures on Choices under Un-

certainty. Random House, New York, 1968.

[230] Ramoni, M., and Sebastiani, P. Learning Bayesian networks from incomplete

databases. In Proceedings of the Thirteenth Conference on Uncertainty in

Artiﬁcial Intelligence (San Mateo, CA, 1997), D. Geiger and P. P. Shenoy,

Eds., Morgan Kaufmann, pp. 401–408.

[231] Ramsey, F. P. Truth and probability. In The Foundations of Mathematics and

Other Essays, R. Braithwaite, Ed. Humanities Press, New York, 1931.

[232] Rawls, J. A Theory of Justice. Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, 1971.

[233] Reichenbach, H. The Direction of Time. University of California, Berkeley,

1956.

[234] Resnick, L. B., Nesher, P., Leonard, F., Magone, M., Omanson, S., and Peled,

I. Conceptual bases of arithmetic errors: The case of decimal fractions. Jour-

nal for Research in Mathematics Education 20, 1 (1989), 8–27.

[235] Rissanen, J. Modeling by shortest data description. Automatica 14 (1978),

465–471.

[236] Robinson, R. W. Combinatorial Mathematics V. No. 622 in Lecture Notes in

Mathematics. Springer-Verlag, 1977.

[237] Russell, S., and Norvig, P. Artiﬁcial Intelligence: A Modern Approach,

ﬁrst ed. Prentice Hall Series in Artiﬁcial Intelligence. Prentice Hall, Engle-

wood Cliffs, NJ, 1995.

[238] Russell, S., and Norvig, P. Artiﬁcial Intelligence: A Modern Approach, sec-

ond ed. Prentice Hall Series in Artiﬁcial Intelligence. Prentice Hall, Engle-

wood Cliffs, NJ, 2003.

[239] S. Lichtenstein, B. F., and Phillips, L. D. Calibration of probabilities: The

state of the art to 1980. In Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Bi-

ases. Cambridge, 1982, pp. 306–334.

[240] S.A. Anderson, D. M., and Perlman, M. A characterization of Markov equiv-

alence classes for acyclic digraphs. Annals of Statistics 25 (1997), 505–541.

[241] Sackur-Grisvard, C., and Leonard, F. Intermediate cognitive organization in

the process of learning a mathematical concept: The order of positive decimal

numbers. Cognition and Instruction 2 (1985), 157–174.

[242] Sakamoto.Y., Ishiguro, M., and Kitagawa, G. Akaike Information Criterion

Statistics. KTK Scientiﬁc Publishers, Tokyo, 1986.