Kline R.B. Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling

Подождите немного. Документ загружается.

394 References

Jackson, D. L. (2003). Revisiting sample size and number of parameter estimates: Some support

for the N:q hypothesis. Structural Equation Modeling, 10, 128–141.

Jackson, D. L., Gillaspy, J. A., Jr., & Purc-Stephenson, R. (2009). Reporting practices in conﬁrma-

tory factor analysis: An overview and some recommendations. Psychological Methods, 14,

6–23.

James, L. R., & Brett, J. M. (1984). Mediators, moderators, and tests for mediation. Journal of

Applied Psychology, 69, 307–321.

James, L. R., & Singh, B. K. (1978). An introduction to the logic, assumptions, and basic analytic

procedures of two-stage least squares. Psychological Bulletin, 85, 1104–1122.

Jarvis, C. B., MacKenzie, S. B., & Podsakoff, P. M. (2003). A critical review of construct indicators

and measurement model misspeciﬁcation in marketing and consumer research. Journal of

Consumer Research, 30, 199–218.

Jöreskog, K. G. (1993). Testing structural equation models. In K. A. Bollen & J. S. Lang (Eds.),

Testing structural equation models (pp. 294–316). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

Jöreskog, K. G. (2000). Interpretation of R

revisited. Retrieved April 29, 2009, from www.ssicen-

tral.com/lisrel/techdocs/r2rev.pdf

Jöreskog, K. G. (2004). On chi-squares for the independence model and ﬁt measures in LISREL.

Retrieved April 10, 2009, from www.ssicentral.com/lisrel/techdocs/ ftb.pdf

Jöreskog, K. G. (2005). Structural equation modeling with ordinal variables using LISREL.

Retrieved June 4, 2009, from www.ssicentral.com/lisrel/techdocs/ordinal.pdf

Jöreskog, K. G., & Moustaki, I. (2006). Factor analysis of ordinal variables with full informa-

tion maximum likelihood. Retrieved June 9, 2009, from www.ssicentral.com/lisrel/techdocs/

orﬁml.pdf

Jöreskog, K. G., & Sörbom, D. (1982). Recent developments in structural equation modeling.

Journal of Marketing Research, 19, 404–416.

Jöreskog, K. G., & Sörbom, D. (2006). LISREL 8.80 for Windows [Computer software]. Lincoln-

wood, IL: Scientiﬁc Software International.

Jöreskog, K. G., & Yang, F. (1996). Nonlinear structural equation models: The Kenny–Judd

model with interaction effects. In G. A. Marcoulides & R. E. Schumacker (Eds.), Advanced

structural equation modeling (pp. 57–88). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

Kamata, A., & Bauer, D. J. (2008). A note on the relation between factor analytic and item response

models. Structural Equation Modeling, 15, 136–153.

Kano, Y. (2001). Structural equation modeling with experimental data. In R. Cudeck, S. du Toit,

& D. Sörbom (Eds.), Structural equation modeling: Present and future. A festschrift in honor of

Karl Jöreskog (pp. 381–402). Lincolnwood, IL: Scientiﬁc Software International.

Kaplan, D. (1995). Statistical power in structural equation modeling. In R. H. Hoyle (Ed.), Struc-

tural equation modeling (pp. 100–117). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Kaplan, D. (2000). Structural equation modeling. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Kaplan, D. (2009). Structural equation modeling: Foundations and extensions (2nd ed.). Thousand

Oaks, CA: Sage.

Kaplan, D., Harik, P., & Hotchkiss, L. (2001) . Cross-sectional estimation of dynamic structural

equation models in disequilibrium. In R. Cudeck, S. du Toit, & D. Sörbom (Eds.), Structural

equation modeling: Present and future. A festschrift in honor of Karl Jöreskog (pp. 315–339).

Lincolnwood, IL: Scientiﬁc Software International.

Kaufman, A. S., & Kaufman, N. L. (1983). K-ABC administration and scoring manual. Circle Pines,

MN: American Guidance Service.

Keith, T. Z. (1985). Questioning the K-ABC: What does it measure? School Psychology Review, 14, 9–20.

Kelloway, E. K. (1998). Using LISREL for structural equation modeling: A researcher’s guide. Thou-

sand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Kenny, D. A. (1979). Correlation and causality. New York: Wiley.

Kenny, D. A. (2002). Instrumental variable estimation. Retrieved April 24, 2009, from http://

davidakenny.net/cm/iv.htm

References 395

Kenny, D. A. (2004). Terminology and basics of SEM. Retrieved April 1, 2009, from http://

davidakenny.net/cm/basics.htm

Kenny, D. A. (2008). Mediation. Retrieved April 20, 2009, from http://davidakenny.net/cm/mediate.

htm

Kenny, D. (2009). Moderator variables: Introduction. Retrieved July 13, 2009, from davidakenny.

net/cm/moderation.htm

Kenny, D. A., & Judd, C. M. (1984). Estimating the nonlinear and interactive effects of latent

variables. Psychological Bulletin, 96, 201–210.

Kenny, D. A., & Kashy, D. A. (1992). Analysis of the multitrait–multimethod matrix by conﬁrma-

tory factor analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 165–172.

Kenny, D. A., Kashy, D. A., & Bolger, N. (1998). Data analysis in social psychology. In D. Gil-

bert, S. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (Vol. 1, 4th ed., pp.

233–265). Boston, MA: McGraw-Hill.

Killeen, P. R. (2005). An alternative to null-hypothesis signiﬁcance tests. Psychological Science,

15, 345–353.

Kim, K. H. (2005). The relation among ﬁt indexes, power, and sample size in structural equation

modeling. Structural Equation Modeling, 12, 368–390.

Kirk, R. (1996). Practical signiﬁcance: A concept whose time has come. Educational and Psycho-

logical Measurement, 56, 746–759.

Klein, A., & Moosbrugger, A. (2000). Maximum likelihood estimation of latent interaction effects

with the LMS method. Psychometrika, 65, 457–474.

Klein, A. G., & Muthén, B. O. (2007). Quasi-maximum likelihood estimation of structural equa-

tion models with multiple interaction and quadratic effects. Multivariate Behavioral Research,

42, 647–673.

Kline, R. B. (2004). Beyond signiﬁcance testing: Reforming data analysis methods in behavioral

research. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

Kline, R. B. (2009). Becoming a behavioral science researcher: A guide to producing research that

matters. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

Kline, R. B., Snyder, J., & Castellanos, M. (1996). Lessons from the Kaufman Assessment Battery

for Children (K-ABC): Toward a new assessment model. Psychological Assessment, 8, 7–17.

Krull, J. L., & MacKinnon, D. P. (2001). Multilevel modeling of individual and group level medi-

ated effects. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 36, 249–277.

Kühnel, S. (2001). The didactical power of structural equation modeling. In R. Cudeck, S. du Toit,

& D. Sörbom (Eds.), Structural equation modeling: Present and future. A Festschrift in honor of

Karl Jöreskog (pp. 79–96). Lincolnwood, IL: Scientiﬁc Software International.

Lance, C. E. (1988). Residual centering, exploratory and conﬁrmatory moderator analysis, and

decomposition of effects in path models containing interaction effects. Applied Psychological

Measurement, 12, 163–175.

Lee, S. Y., Poon, W. Y., & Bentler, P. M. (1995). A two-stage estimation of structural equation

models with continuous and polytomous variables. British Journal of Mathematical and Sta-

tistical Psychology, 48, 339–358.

Little, R. J. A., & Rubin, D. B. (2002). Statistical analysis with missing data (2nd ed.). New York: Wiley.

Little, T. D., Bovaird, J. A., & Widaman, K. F. (2006). On the merits of orthogonalizing powered

and product terms: Implications for modeling interactions among latent variables. Struc-

tural Equation Modeling, 13, 497–519.

Little, T. D., Cunningham, W. A., Shahar, G., & Widaman, K. F. (2002). To parcel or not to parcel:

Exploring the question, weighing the merits. Structural Equation Modeling, 9, 151–173.

Little, T. D., Lindenberger, U., & Nesselroade, J. R. (1999). On selecting indicators for multivari-

ate measurement and modeling with latent variables: When “good” indicators are bad and

“bad” indicators are good. Psychological Methods, 4, 192–211.

Little, T. D., Slegers, D. W., & Card, N. A. (2006). A non-arbitrary method of identifying and scal-

ing latent variables in SEM and MACS models. Structural Equation Modeling, 13, 59–72.

396 References

Liu, K. (1988). Measurement error and its impact on partial correlation and multiple linear

regression analyses. American Journal of Epidemiology, 127, 864–874.

Loehlin, J. C. (2004). Latent variable models: An introduction to factor, path, and structural equation

analysis (4th ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

Lunneborg, C. E. (2001). Random assignment of available case methods: Bootstrap standard

errors and conﬁdence intervals. Psychological Methods, 6, 406–412.

Lynam, D. R., Mofﬁtt, T., & Stouthamer–Loeber, M. (1993). Explaining the relation between IQ

and delinquency: Class, race, test motivation, or self-control? Journal of Abnormal Psychol-

ogy, 102, 187–196.

Maas, C. J. M., & Hox, J. J. (2005). Sufﬁcient sample sizes for multilevel modeling. Methodology,

3, 86–92.

Maasen, G. H., & Bakker, A. B. (2001). Suppressor variables in path models: Deﬁnitions and

interpretations. Sociological Methods and Research, 30, 241–270.

MacCallum, R. C. (1986). Speciﬁcation searches in covariance structure modeling. Psychological

Bulletin, 100, 107–120.

MacCallum, R. C., & Austin, J. T. (2000). Applications of structural equation modeling in psy-

chological research. Annual Review of Psychology, 51, 201–236.

MacCallum, R. C., & Browne, M. W. (1993). The use of causal indicators in covariance structure

models: Some practical issues. Psychological Bulletin, 114, 533–541.

MacCallum, R. C., Browne, M. W., & Sugawara, H. M. (1996). Power analysis and determination

of sample size for covariance structure modeling. Psychological Methods, 1, 130–149.

MacCallum, R. C., & Hong, S. (1997). Power analysis in covariance structure modeling using

GFI and AGFI. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 32, 193–210.

MacCallum, R. C., Wegener, D. T., Uchino, B. N., & Fabrigar, L. R. (1993). The problem of equiv-

alent models in applications of covariance structure analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 114,

185–199.

MacKinnon, D. P., Fairchild, A. J., & Fritz, M. S. (2007). Mediation analysis. Annual Review of

Psychology, 58, 593–614.

MacKinnon, D. P., Krull, J. L., & Lockwood, C. M. (2000). Equivalence of the mediation, con-

founding, and suppression effect. Prevention Science, 1, 173–181.

Marcoulides, G. A., & Drezner, Z. (2001). Speciﬁcation searches in structural equation modeling

with a genetic algorithm. In G. A. Marcoulides and R. E. Schumaker (Eds.), New develop-

ments and techniques in structural equation modeling (pp. 247–268). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

Marcoulides, G. A., & Drezner, Z. (2003). Model speciﬁcation searches using ant colony optimi-

zation algorithms. Structural Equation Modeling, 10, 154–164.

Mardia, K. V. (1970). Measures of multivariate skewness and kurtosis with applications.

Biometrika, 57, 519–530.

Mardia, K. V. (1985). Mardia’s test of multinormality. In S. Kotz & N. L. Johnson (Eds.), Encyclo-

pedia of statistical sciences (Vol. 5, pp. 217–221). New York: Wiley.

Markland, D. (2007). The golden rule is that there are no golden rules: A commentary on Paul

Barrett’s recommendations for reporting model ﬁt in structural equation modelling. Person-

ality and Individual Differences, 42, 851–858.

Marsh, H. W., & Bailey, M. (1991). Conﬁrmatory factor analysis of multitrait–multimethod data:

A comparison of alternative models. Applied Psychological Measurement, 15, 47–70.

Marsh, H. W., Balla, J. R., & Hau, K.-T. (1996). An evaluation of incremental ﬁt indices: A clariﬁ-

cation of mathematical and empirical properties. In G. A. Marcoulides & R. E. Schumaker

(Eds.), Advanced structural equation modeling (pp. 315–353). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

Marsh, H. W., Balla, J. R., & McDonald, R. P. (1988). Goodness-of-ﬁt indices in conﬁrmatory fac-

tor analysis: The effect of sample size. Psychological Bulletin, 103, 391–411.

Marsh, H. W., & Grayson, D. (1995). Latent variable models of multitrait–multimethod data. In

R. H. Hoyle (Ed.), Structural equation modeling (pp. 177–198). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

References 397

Marsh, H. W., & Hau, K.-T. (1996). Assessing goodness of ﬁt: Is parsimony always desirable?

Journal of Experimental Education, 96, 364–391.

Marsh, H. W., & Hau, K.-T. (1999). Conﬁrmatory factor analysis: Strategies for small sample

sizes. In R. H. Hoyle (Ed.), Statistical strategies for small sample research (pp. 252–284).

Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Marsh, H. W., Hau, K.-T., & Wen, Z. (2004). In search of golden rules: Comment on hypothesis

testing approaches to setting cutoff values for ﬁt indexes and dangers in overgeneralizing

Hu and Bentler’s (1999) ﬁndings. Structural Equation Modeling, 11, 320–341.

Marsh, H. W., Wen, Z., & Hau, K. T. (2004). Structural equation models of latent interactions:

Evaluation of alternative estimation strategies and indicator construction. Psychological

Methods, 9, 275–300.

Marsh, H. W., Wen, Z., & Hau, K. T. (2006). Structural equation modeling of latent interaction

and quadratic effects. In G. R. Hancock & R. O. Mueller (Eds.), Structural equation modeling:

A second course (pp. 225–265). Greenwich, CT: IAP.

Maruyama, G. M. (1998). Basics of structural equation modeling. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

McArdle, J. J., & McDonald, R. P. (1984). Some algebraic properties of the Reticular Action Model

for moment structures. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 37, 234–

251.

McCoach, D. B., Black, A. C., & O’Connell, A. A. (2007). Errors of inference in structural equa-

tion modeling. Psychology in the Schools, 44, 461–470.

McDonald, R. P. (1989). An index of goodness of ﬁt based on noncentrality. Journal of Classiﬁca-

tion, 6, 97–103.

McDonald, R. P., & Ho, M.-H. R. (2002). Principles and practice in reporting structural equation

analyses. Psychological Methods, 7, 64–82.

McDonald, R. P., & Marsh, H. W. (1990). Choosing a multivariate model: Noncentrality and

goodness of ﬁt. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 247–255.

McKnight, P. E., McKnight, K. M., Sidani, S., & Figueredo, A. J. (2007). Missing data: A gentle

introduction. New York: Guilford Press.

Meade, A. W., & Bauer, D. J. (2007). Power and precision in conﬁrmatory factor analytic tests of

measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 14, 611–635.

Meade, A. W., Johnson, E. C., & Braddy, P. W. (2008). Power and sensitivity of alternative ﬁt indi-

ces in tests of measurement invariance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93, 568–592.

Meade, A. W., & Lautenschlager, G. J. (2004). A comparison of item response theory and con-

ﬁrmatory factor analytic methodologies for establishing measurement equivalence/invari-

ance. Organizational Research Methods, 7, 361–388.

Meredith, W., & Tisak, J. (1990). Latent curve analysis. Psychometrika, 55, 107–122.

Merton, T. (1965). The way of Chuang Tzu. New York: New Directions.

Messick, S. (1995). Validation of inferences from persons’ responses and performances as scien-

tiﬁc inquiry into score meaning. American Psychologist, 50, 741–749.

Miles, J., & Shevlin, M. (2007). A time and a place for incremental ﬁt indices. Personality and

Individual Differences, 42, 869–874.

Millsap, R. E. (2007). Structural equation modeling made difﬁcult. Personality and Individual

Differences, 42, 875–881.

Mooijaart, A., & Satorra, A. (2009). On insensitivity of the chi-square model test to non-linear

misspeciﬁcation in structural equation models. Psychometrika, 74, 443–455.

Mueller, R. O. (1996). Basic principles of structural equation modeling: An introduction to LISREL

and EQS. New York: Springer.

Mulaik, S. A. (2000). Objectivity and other metaphors of structural equation modeling. In R.

Cudeck, S. du Toit, & D. Sörbom (Eds.), Structural equation modeling: Present and future. A

festschrift in honor of Karl Jöreskog (pp. 59–78). Lincolnwood, IL: Scientiﬁc Software Inter-

national.

398 References

Mulaik, S. A. (2007). There is a place for approximate ﬁt in structural equation modelling. Per-

sonality and Individual Differences, 42, 883–891.

Mulaik, S. A. (2009). Linear causal modeling with structural equations. New York: CRC Press.

Mulaik, S. A., & Millsap, R. E. (2000). Doing the four-step right. Structural Equation Modeling,

7, 36–73.

Murphy, S. A., Chung, I.-J., & Johnson, L. C. (2002). Patterns of mental distress following the

violent death of a child and predictors of change over time. Research in Nursing and Health,

25, 425–437.

Muthén, B. O. (1984). A general structural equation model with dichotomous, ordered categori-

cal, and continuous latent variable indicators. Psychometrika, 49, 115–132.

Muthén, B. O. (1994). Multilevel covariance structure analysis. Sociological Methods and Research,

22, 376–398.

Muthén, B. O. (2001). Latent variable mixture modeling. In G. A. Marcoulides & R. E. Schu-

maker (Eds.), New developments and techniques in structural equation modeling (pp. 1–33).

Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

Muthén, B. O., & Asparouhov, T. (2002). Latent variable analysis with categorical outcomes:

Multiple-group and growth modeling in Mplus. Retrieved June 9, 2009, from www. statmodel.

com/download/webnotes/CatMGLong.pdf

Muthén, B. O., du Toit, S. H. C., & Spisic, D. (1997). Robust inference using weighted least

squares and quadratic estimating equations in latent variable modeling with categorical

and continuous outcomes. Retrieved May 2, 2009, from www.gseis.ucla.edu/faculty/muthen/

articles/Article_075.pdf

Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (2002). How to use a Monte Carlo study to decide on sample size

and determine power. Structural Equation Modeling, 4, 599–620.

Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (1998–2010). Mplus user’s guide (6th ed.). Los Angeles: Muthén

& Muthén.

Nachtigall, C., Kroehne, U., Funke, F., & Steyer, R. (2003). (Why) Should we use SEM? Pros and

cons of structural equation modeling. Methods of Psychological Research Online, 8(2), 1–22.

Retrieved March 24, 2009, from http://aodgps.de/fachgruppen/methoden/mpr-online/issue20/

art1/mpr127_11.pdf

Neale, M. C., Boker, S. M., Xie, G., & Maes, H. H. (2003). Mx: Statistical modeling (6th ed.). Rich-

mond: Virginia Commonwealth University, Virginia Institute for Psychiatric and Behavioral

Genetics.

Nelson, T. D., Aylward, B. S., & Steele, R. G. (2008). Structural equation modeling in pediat-

ric psychology: Overview and review of applications. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 33,

679 –687.

Neuman, G. A., Bolin, A. U., & Briggs, T. E. (2000). Identifying general factors of intelligence:

A conﬁrmatory factor analysis of the Ball Aptitude Battery. Educational and Psychological

Measurement, 60, 697–712.

Nevitt, J., & Hancock, G. R. (2000). Improving the root mean square error of approximation for

nonnormal conditions in structural equation modeling. Journal of Experimental Education,

68, 251–268.

Nevitt, J., & Hancock, G. R. (2001). Performance of bootstrapping approaches to model test sta-

tistics and parameter standard error estimation in structural equation modeling. Structural

Equation Modeling, 8, 353–377.

Nevitt, J., & Hancock, G. R. (2004). Evaluating small sample approaches for model test statistics

in structural equation modeling. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 39, 439–478.

Noar, S. M. (2007). The role of structural equation modeling in scale development. Structural

Equation Modeling, 10, 622–647.

Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric theory (3rd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.

Oakes, M. (1986). Statistical inference: A commentary for the social and behavioral sciences. New

York: Wiley.

References 399

O’Brien, R. M. (1994). Identiﬁcation of simple measurement models with multiple latent vari-

ables and correlated errors. Sociological Methodology, 24, 137–170.

Olsson, U. H., Foss, T., & Breivik, E. (2004). Two equivalent discrepancy functions for maximum

likelihood estimation: Do their test statistics follow a non-central chi-square distribution

under model misspeciﬁcation? Sociological Methods and Research, 32, 453–500.

Olsson, U. H., Foss, T., Troye, S. V., & Howell, R. D. (2000). The performance of ML, GLS, and

WLS estimation in structural equation modeling under conditions of misspeciﬁcation and

non-normality. Structural Equation Modeling, 7, 557–595.

Osborne, J. (2002). Notes on the use of data transformations. Practical Assessment, Research & Eval-

uation, 8(6). Retrieved February 23, 2009, from http://PAREonline.net/ getvn.asp?v=8&n=6

Pearl, J. (2000). Causality: Models, reasoning, and inference. New York: Cambridge University

Press.

Pedhazur, E. J., & Schmelkin, L. P. (1991). Measurement, design, and analysis: An integrated

approach. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

Peng, C.Y. J., Harwell, M., Liou, S.M., & Ehman, L. H. (2007). Advances in missing data methods

and implications for educational research. In S. S. Sawilowsky (Ed.), Real data analysis (pp.

31–78). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.

Peng, C.-Y. J, Lee, K. L., & Ingersoll, G. M. (2002). An introduction to logistic regression analysis

and reporting. Journal of Educational Research, 96(1), 3–14.

Peters, C. L. O., & Enders, C. (2002). A primer for the estimation of structural equation models

in the presence of missing data. Journal of Targeting, Measurement and Analysis for Market-

ing, 11, 81–95.

Ping, R. A. (1996). Interaction and quadratic effect estimation: A two-step technique using struc-

tural equation analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 119, 166–175.

Preacher, K. J., & Coffman, D. L. (2006). Computing power and minimum sample size for RMSEA.

Retrieved November 15, 2009, from http://people.ku.edu/~preacher/rmsea/rmsea.htm

Preacher, K. J., Curran, P. J., & Bauer, D. J. (2006). Computational tools for probing interaction

effects in multiple linear regression, multilevel modeling, and latent curve analysis. Journal

of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 31, 437–448.

Preacher, K. J., Rucker, D. D., & Hayes, A. F. (2007). Addressing moderated mediation hypoth-

eses: Theory, methods, and prescriptions. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 42, 185–227.

Provalis Research. (1995–2004). SimStat for Windows (Version 2.5.5) [Computer software].

Montréal, Québec, Canada: Author.

Rabe-Hesketh, S., Skrondal, A., & Zheng, X. (2007). Multilevel structural equation modeling.

In S.-Y. Lee (Ed.), Handbook of computing and statistics with applications: Vol. 1. Handbook of

latent variable and related models (pp. 209–227). Amsterdam: Elsevier.

Raftery, A. E. (1995). Bayesian model selection in social research. Sociological Methodology, 25,

111–163.

Raudenbush, S. W., & Bryk, A. S. (2002). Hierarchical linear models (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks,

CA: Sage.

Raudenbush, S. W., Bryk, A. S., & Cheong, Y. F. (2008). HLM 6.06 for Windows [computer soft-

ware]. Lincolnwood, IL: Scientiﬁc Software International.

Raykov, T. (1997). Estimation of composite reliability for congeneric measures. Applied Psycho-

logical Measurement, 21, 173–184.

Raykov, T. (2004). Behavioral scale reliability and measurement invariance evaluation using

latent variable modeling. Behavior Therapy, 35, 299–331.

Raykov, T., & Marcoulides, G. A. (2000). A ﬁrst course in structural equation modeling. Mahwah,

NJ: Erlbaum.

Raykov, T., & Marcoulides, G. A. (2001). Can there be inﬁnitely many models equivalent to a

given covariance structure? Structural Equation Modeling, 8, 142–149.

Raykov, T., Tomer, A., & Nesselroade, J. R. (1991). Reporting structural equation modeling results

in Psychology and Aging: Some proposed guidelines. Psychology and Aging, 6, 499–503.

400 References

Reise, S. P., Widaman, K. F., & Pugh, R. H. (1993). Conﬁrmatory factor analysis and item response

theory: Two approaches for exploring measurement invariance. Psychological Bulletin, 114,

552–566.

Rigdon, E. E. (1995). A necessary and sufﬁcient identiﬁcation rule for structural models esti-

mated in practice. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 30, 359–383.

Rindskopf, D. (1984). Structural equation models: Empirical identiﬁcation, Heywood cases, and

related problems. Sociological Methods and Research, 13, 109–119.

Robert, S., & Pashler, H. (2000). How persuasive is a good ﬁt? A comment on theory testing in

psychology. Psychological Review, 107, 358–367.

Robinson, D. H., Levin, J. R., Thomas, G. D., Pituch, K. A., & Vaughn S. (2007). The incidence

of “causal” statements in teaching-and-learning research journals. American Educational

Research Journal, 44, 400–413.

Rodgers, J. L. (1999). The bootstrap, the jackknife, and the randomization test: A sampling tax-

onomy. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 34, 441–456.

Rogosa, D. R. (1988). Ballad of the casual modeler. Retrieved July 25, 2009, from www.stanford.edu/

class/ed260/ballad

Romney, D. M., Jenkins, C. D., & Bynner, J. M. (1992). A structural analysis of health-related

quality of life dimensions. Human Relations, 45, 165–176.

Rosenberg, J. F. (1998). Kant and the problem of simultaneous causation. International Journal of

Philosophical Studies, 6, 167–188.

Roth, D. L., Wiebe, D. J., Fillingim, R. B., & Shay, K. A. (1989). Life events, ﬁtness, hardiness, and

health: A simultaneous analysis of proposed stress-resistance effects. Journal of Personality

and Social Psychology, 57, 136–142.

Roth, P. L. (1994). Missing data: A conceptual review for applied psychologists. Personnel Psychol-

ogy, 47, 537–560.

Sabatelli, R. M., & Bartle–Haring, S. (2003). Family-of-origin experiences and adjustment in

married couples. Journal of Marriage and Family, 65, 159–169.

Sagan, C. (1996). The demon-haunted world: Science as a candle in the dark. New York: Random House.

Saris, W. E., & Alberts, C. (2003). Different explanations for correlated disturbance terms in

MTMM studies. Structural Equation Modeling, 10, 193–213.

Saris, W. E., & Satorra, A. (1993). Power evaluations in structural equation models. In K. A. Bol-

len & J. S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 181–204). Newbury Park, CA:

Sage.

Satorra, A., & Bentler, P. M. (1994). Corrections to test statistics and standard errors on covari-

ance structure analysis. In A. von Eye & C. C. Clogg (Eds.), Latent variables analysis (pp.

399–419). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Satorra, A., & Bentler, P. M. (2001). A scaled difference chi-square test statistic for moment struc-

ture analysis. Psychometrika, 66, 507–512.

Sava, F. A. (2002). Causes and effects of teacher conﬂict-inducing attitudes towards pupils: A

path analysis model. Teaching and Teacher Education, 18, 1007–1021.

Schmidt, F. L., & Hunter, J. E. (1997). Eight common but false objections to the discontinuation

of signiﬁcance testing in the analysis of research data. In L. L. Harlow, S. A. Mulaik, & J. H.

Steiger (Eds.), What if there were no signiﬁcance tests? (pp. 37–64). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

Schmitt, N., & Kuljanin, G. (2008). Measurement invariance: Review of practice and limitations.

Human Resource Management Review, 18, 210–222.

Schmukle, S. C., & Hardt, J. (2005). A cautionary note on incremental ﬁt indices reported by

LISREL. Methodology, 1, 81–85.

Schreiber, J. B. (2008). Core reporting practices in structural equation modeling. Research in

Social and Administrative Pharmacy, 4, 83–97.

Schreiber, J. B., Nora, A., Stage, F. K., Barlow, E. A., & King, J. (2006). Reporting structural equa-

tion modeling and conﬁrmatory factor analysis results: A review. Journal of Educational

Research, 99, 323–337.

References 401

Schumacker, R. E., & Lomax, R. G. (2004). A beginner’s guide to structural equation modeling (2nd

ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

Schumacker, R. E., & Marcoulides, G. A. (Eds.). (1998). Interaction and nonlinear effects in struc-

tural equation modeling. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

Shah, R., & Goldstein, S. M. (2006). Use of structural equation modeling in operations manage-

ment research: Looking back and forward. Journal of Operations Management, 24, 148–169.

Shen, B.-J., & Takeuchi, D. T. (2001). A structural model of acculturation and mental health sta-

tus among Chinese Americans. American Journal of Community Psychology, 29, 387–418.

Shieh, G. (2006). Suppression situations in multiple linear regression. Educational and Psycho-

logical Measurement, 66, 435–447.

Shrout, P. E., & Bolger, N. (2002). Mediation in experimental and nonexperimental studies: New

procedures and recommendations. Psychological Methods, 7, 422–445.

Sikström, S. (2001). Forgetting curves: Implications for connectionist models. Cognitive Psychol-

ogy, 45, 95–152.

Silvia, E. S. M., & MacCallum, R. C. (1988). Some factors affecting the success of speciﬁcation

searches in covariance structure modeling. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 23, 297–326.

Skrondal, A., & Rabe-Hesketh, S. (2004). Generalized latent variable modeling: Multilevel, longitu-

dinal, and structural equation models. Boca Raton, FL: Chapman & Hall/CRC.

Sobel, M. E. (1986). Some new results on indirect effects and their standard errors in covariance

structure models. In N. B. Tuma (Ed.), Sociological methodology (pp. 159–186). San Fran-

cisco: Jossey-Bass.

Song, M., Droge, C., Hanvanich, S., & Calantone, R. (2005). Marketing and technology resource

complementarity: An analysis of their interaction effect in two environmental contexts.

Strategic Management Journal, 26, 259–276.

Sörbom, D. (1974). A general method for studying differences in factor means and structure

between groups. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 27, 229–239.

Spearman, C. (1904). General intelligence, objectively determined and measured. American Jour-

nal of Psychology, 15, 201–293.

Sribney, B. (1998). Problems with stepwise regression. Retrieved January 23, 2009, from www.

stata.com/support/faqs/stat/stepwise.html

Stapleton, L. M. (2006). Using multilevel structural equation modeling techniques with complex

sample data. In G. R. Hancock & R. O. Mueller (Eds.), Structural equation modeling: A second

course (pp. 345–383). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.

Stark, S., Chernyshenko, O. S., & Drasgow, F. (2006). Detecting differential item functioning

with conﬁrmatory factor analysis and item response theory: Toward a uniﬁed strategy. Jour-

nal of Applied Psychology, 91(6), 1292–1306.

StatSoft, Inc. (2009). STATISTICA 9 [Computer software]. Tulsa, OK: Author.

Steele, J. D. (2009). Structural equation modelling (SEM) for fMRI using Matlab. Retrieved July

30, 2009, from www.dundee.ac.uk/cmdn/staff/douglas_steele/structural_equation_modelling

Steiger, J. H. (1990). Structural model evaluation and modiﬁcation: An interval estimation

approach. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 25, 173–180.

Steiger, J. H. (2001). Driving fast in reverse: The relationship between software development,

theory, and education in structural equation modeling. Journal of the American Statistical

Association, 96, 331–338.

Steiger, J. H. (2002). When constraints interact: A caution about reference variables, identiﬁ-

cation constraints, and scale dependencies in structural equation modeling. Psychological

Methods, 7, 210–227.

Steiger, J. H. (2007). Understanding the limitations of global ﬁt assessment in structural equation

modeling. Personality and Individual Differences, 42, 893–898.

Steiger, J. H., & Fouladi, R. T. (1997). Noncentrality interval estimation and the evaluation of

statistical models. In L. L. Harlow, S. A. Mulaik, & J. H. Steiger (Eds.), What if there were no

signiﬁcance tests? (pp. 221–257). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

402 References

Systat Software, Inc. (2009). SYSTAT (Version 13.0) [Computer software]. Chicago: Author.

Temme, D., Kreis, D., & Hildebrandt, L. (2006). PLS path modeling—A software review (SFB 649

Discussion Paper 2006-084). Berlin: Sonderforschungsbereich 649: Ökonomisches Risiko.

Retrieved June 20, 2009, from http://edoc.hu-berlin.de/series/sfb-649-papers/2006-84/PDF/84.pdf

The MathWorks (2010). MATLAB (Version 7.10, Release 2010a) [Computer software]. Natick,

MA: Author.

Thompson, B. (1992). Two and one-half decades of leadership in measurement and evaluation.

Journal of Counseling and Development, 70, 434–438.

Thompson, B. (1995). Stepwise regression and stepwise discriminant analysis need not apply

here: A guidelines editorial. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 55, 525–534.

Thompson, B. (2000). Ten commandments of structural equation modeling. In L. G. Grimm &

P. R. Yarnold (Eds.), Reading and understanding more multivariate statistics (pp. 261–283).

Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

Thompson, B. (Ed.). (2003). Score reliability. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Thompson, B. (2004). Exploratory and conﬁrmatory factor analysis: Understanding concepts and

applications. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

Thompson, B., & Vacha-Haase, T. (2000). Psychometrics is datametrics: The test is not reliable.

Education and Psychological Measurement, 60, 174–195.

Thorndike, R. M., & Thorndike-Christ, T. M. (2010). Measurement and evaluation in psychology

and education (8th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson Education.

Tomarken, A. J., & Waller, N. G. (2003). Potential problems with “well-ﬁtting” models. Journal of

Abnormal Psychology, 112, 578–598.

Tomarken, A. J., & Waller, N. G. (2005). Structural equation modeling: Strengths, limitations,

and misconceptions. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 1, 31–65.

Tu, Y.-K. (2009). Commentary: Is structural equation modelling a step forward for epidemiolo-

gists? International Journal of Epidemiology, 38, 549–551.

Vacha-Haase, T., Ness, C., Nilsson, J., & Reetz, D. (1999). Practices regarding reporting of reli-

ability coefﬁcients: A review of three journals. Journal of Experimental Education, 67, 335–

341.

van Prooijen, J.-W., & van der Kloot, W. A. (2001). Conﬁrmatory analysis of exploratively

obtained factor structures. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 61, 777–792.

Vernon, P. A., & Eysenck, S. B. G. (Eds.). (2007). Structural equation modeling [Special issue].

Personality and Individual Differences, 42(5).

Villar, P., Luengo, M. Á., Gómez-Fraguela, J. A., & Romero, E. (2006). Assessment of the validity

of parenting constructs using the multitrait–multimethod model. European Journal of Psy-

chological Assessment, 22, 59–68.

Vinzi, V. E., Chin, W. W., Henseler, J., & Wang, H. (Eds.). (2009). Handbook of partial least squares:

Concepts, methods and applications in marketing and related ﬁelds. New York: Springer.

Vriens, M., & Melton, E. (2002). Managing missing data. Marketing Research, 14, 12–17.

Wagner, R. K., Torgeson, J. K., & Rashotte, C. A. (1994). Development of reading-related phono-

logical processing abilities: New evidence of a bidirectional causality from a latent variable

longitudinal study. Developmental Psychology, 30, 73–87.

Wald, A. (1943). Tests of statistical hypotheses concerning several parameters when the number

of observations is large. Transactions of the American Mathematical Society, 54, 426–482.

Wall, M. M., & Amemiya, Y. (2001). Generalized appended product indicator procedure for

nonlinear structural equation analysis. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 26,

1–29.

West, S. G. (2001). New approaches to missing data in psychological research [Special section].

Psychological Methods, 6(4).

Wherry, R. J. (1931). A new formula for predicting the shrinkage of the coefﬁcient of multiple

correlation. Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 2, 440–451.

References 403

Whisman, M. A., & McClelland, G. H. (2005). Designing, testing, and interpreting interactions

and moderator effects in family research. Journal of Family Psychology, 19, 111–120.

Whitaker, B. G., & McKinney, J. L. (2007). Assessing the measurement invariance of latent job

satisfaction ratings across survey administration modes for respondent subgroups: A MIMIC

modeling approach. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 502–509.

Widaman, K. F., & Thompson, J. S. (2003). On specifying the null model for incremental ﬁt

indexes in structural equation modeling. Psychological Methods, 8, 16–37.

Wiggins, R. D., & Sacker, A. (2002). Strategies for handling missing data in SEM: A user’s per-

spective. In G. A. Marcoulides & I. Moustaki (Eds.), Latent variable and latent structure

models (pp. 105–120). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

Wilkinson, L., & the Task Force on Statistical Inference. (1999). Statistical methods in psychol-

ogy journals: Guidelines and explanations. American Psychologist, 54, 594–604.

Willett, J. B., & Sayer, A. G. (1994). Using covariance structure analysis to detect correlates and

predictors of individual change over time. Psychological Bulletin, 116, 363–381.

Williams, L. J., & O’Boyle, E. H. (2008). Measurement models for linking latent variables and

indicators: A review of human resource management research using parcels. Human Resource

Management Review, 18, 233–242.

Wold, H. (1982). Soft modeling: The basic design and some extensions. In K. G. Jöreskog & H.

Wold (Eds.), Systems under indirect observation: Causality, structure, prediction (Vol. 2, pp.

1–54). Amsterdam: North-Holland.

Wolﬂe, L. M. (2003). The introduction of path analysis to the social sciences, and some emergent

themes: An annotated bibliography. Structural Equation Modeling, 10, 1–34.

Worland, J., Weeks, G. G., Janes, C. L., & Strock, B. D. (1984). Intelligence, classroom behavior,

and academic achievement in children at high and low risk for psychopathology: A struc-

tural equation analysis. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 12, 437–454.

Wothke, W. (1993). Nonpositive deﬁnite matrices in structural equation modeling. In K. A. Bol-

len & J. S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 256–293). Newbury Park, CA:

Sage.

Wright, R. E. (1995). Logistic regression. In L. G. Grimm & P. R. Yarnold (Eds.), Reading and

understanding multivariate statistics (pp. 217–244). Washington, DC: American Psychologi-

cal Association.

Wright, S. (1918). On the nature of size factors. Genetics, 3, 367–374.

Wu, C. H. (2008). The role of perceived discrepancy in satisfaction evaluation. Social Indicators

Research, 88, 423–436.

Yang-Wallentin, F. (2001). Comparisons of the ML and TSLS estimators for the Kenny–Judd

model. In R. Cudeck, S. du Toit, and D. Sörbom (Eds.), Structural equation modeling: Present

and future: A Festschrift in honor of Karl Jöreskog (pp. 425–442). Lincolnwood, IL: Scientiﬁc

Software International.

Yang-Wallentin, F., & Jöreskog, K. G. (2001). Robust standard errors and chi-squares for interac-

tion models. In G. A. Marcoulides & R. Schumacker (Eds.), New developments and techniques

in structural equation modeling (pp. 159–171). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

Yeo, I., & Johnson, R. (2000). A new family of power transformations to improve normality or

symmetry. Biometrika, 87, 954–959.

Yin, P., & Fan, X. (2001). Estimating R-squared shrinkage in multiple regression: A comparison

of different analytical methods. Journal of Experimental Education, 69, 203–224.

Yuan, K.-H. (2005). Fit indices versus test statistics. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 40, 115–

148.

Yuan, K.-H., Bentler, P. M., & Zhang, W. (2005). The effect of skewness and kurtosis on mean and

covariance structure analysis: The univariate case and its multivariate implication. Socio-

logical Methods and Research, 34, 240–258.

Yung, Y.-F., & Bentler, P. M. (1996). Bootstrapping techniques in analysis of mean and covariance