588 •
CHAPTER
27
the management of "insufficient" gingival dimen
sions,
because of higher predictability of the healing
result.
Vestibular/gingival
extension procedures
The "denudation techniques" included the removal of
all soft tissue within an area extending from the gin-
gival margin to a level apical to the mucogingival
junction, leaving the alveolar bone completely ex-
posed (Ochsenbein 1960, Corn 1962, Wilderman 1964)
(Fig. 27-18). Healing following this type of treatment
resulted often in an increased height of the gingival
zone, although in some cases only a very limited effect
was observed. However, the exposure of alveolar bone
produced severe bone resorption with permanent loss
of bone height (Wilderman et al. 1961, Costich & Ram
-
fjord 1968). In addition, the recession of marginal
gingiva in the surgical area often exceeded the gain of
gingiva obtained in the apical portion of the wound
(
Carranza & Carraro 1963, Carraro et al. 1964). Due to
these complications and severe postoperative pain for
the patient, the use of the "denudation technique" can
hardly be justified.
With the "periosteal retention" procedure or "split
flap" procedure (Fig. 27-18) only the superficial por-
tion of the oral mucosa within the wound area is
removed, leaving the bone covered by periosteum (
Staffileno et al. 1962, Wilderman 1963, Pfeifer 1965,
Staffileno et al. 1966). Although the preservation of the
periosteum implies that less severe bone resorption
will occur than following the "denudation technique",
loss of crestal bone height was observed also
following this type of operation unless a relatively
thick layer of connective tissue was retained on the
bone surface (Costich & Ramfjord 1968). If a thick
layer was not secured, the periosteal connective tissue
tended to undergo necrosis and the subsequent heal-
ing closely resembled that following the "denudation
technique" described above.
Other described gingival extension procedures
maybe regarded as modifications of the "denudation"
and "split flap" techniques or combinations of these
procedures. The apically repositioned flap procedure
(
Friedman 1962), for instance, involved the elevation
of
soft tissue flaps and their displacement during
suturing in an apical position, often leaving 3-5 mm
of alveolar bone denuded in the coronal part of the
surgical area. This resulted in the same risk for exten
-
sive bone resorption as other "denudation tech-
niques". It was proposed by Friedman (1962) that a
postsurgical increase of the width of the gingiva can
be predicted with the "apically repositioned flap", but
several studies indicated that the presurgical width
most often was retained or became only slightly in-
creased (Donnenfeld et al. 1964, Carranza & Carraro
1970).
The described vestibular/ gingival extension proce-
dures were based on the assumption that it is the
frictional forces encountered during mastication
which determine the presence of keratinized tissue
adjacent to the teeth (Orban 1957, Pfeifer 1963). There
-
fore, it was believed that by the displacement of mus-
cle attachments and the extension of vestibular depth,
the regenerating tissue in the surgical area would be
subjected to physical impacts and adapt to the same
functional requirements as those met by "normal"
gingiva (Ivancie 1957, Bradley et al. 1959, Pfeifer 1963).
Later studies, however, showed that the characteristic
features of the gingiva are determined by some inher-
ent factors in the tissue rather than being the result of
functional adaptation, and that the differentiation
(
keratinization) of the gingival epithelium is control-
led
by morphogenetic stimuli from the underlying
connective tissue (see Chapter 1).
Grafting procedures
The gingival and palatal soft tissues will maintain
their original characteristics after transplantation to
areas of the alveolar mucosa (see Chapter 1). Hence,
the use of transplants offers the potential to predict the
postsurgical result. The type of transplants used can
be divided into (1) pedicle grafts, which after place-
ment at the recipient site maintain their connection
with the donor site (Fig 27-19), and (2) free grafts,
which have no connection with the donor area (Fig.
27-20). Free grafts have most commonly been used for
gingival augmentation (Haggerty 1966, Nabers 1966,
Sullivan & Atkins 1968a, Hawley & Staffileno 1970,
Edel 1974).
Technique
• The surgical procedure is initiated with the prepa-
ration of the recipient site (Fig. 27-20a,b). By sharp
dissection a periosteal bed free from muscle attach-
ment and of sufficient size is prepared. The partial
thickness flap is displaced apically and sutured.
• In order to ensure that a graft of sufficient size and
proper contour is removed from the donor area,
usually the palatal mucosa in the region of the
premolars, it is recommended to produce a foil
template over the recipient site. The template is
transferred to the donor site where it is outlined by
a
shallow incision (Fig. 27-20c). A graft with a thick
-
ness of approximately 1.5-2 mm is then dissected
from the donor area (Fig. 27-20d). It is advocated to
place the sutures in the graft before it is cut com-
pletely free from the donor area, since this may
facilitate its transfer to the recipient site.
• The graft is immediately transferred to the prepared
recipient bed and sutured (Fig. 27-20e). In order to
immobilize the graft at the recipient site the sutures
must be placed in the periosteum or the adjacent
attached gingiva. After suturing, pressure is exerted
against the graft for 5 min in order to eliminate
blood and exudate between the graft and the recipi-
ent bed. The graft as well as the palatal wound is
protected with a periodontal dressing. To retain the
dressing in the palatal site, a stent usually has to be
used.