8.1.10. Regulation of Interstate and Transboundary Air Pollution
in the United States
As described in Section 6.6.2.4, long-range transport of air pollution is a problem that
affects most countries. International efforts to control transboundary air pollution are
discussed with respect to acid deposition in Section 10.7. Here, control of long-range
transport in and between the United States and its neighbors is discussed.
Interstate transport of air pollution in the United States is recognized by the gov-
ernment through Section 110 of the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1970, which
requires that SIPs be submitted to the U.S. EPA by each state and contain provisions to
address problems of emissions transported to downwind states. Section 126 of
CAAA70 allows downwind states to file petitions with the U.S. EPA to take action to
reduce emissions in upwind states when such emissions make it difficult for the down-
wind state to meet federal air quality standards.
In 1994, the U.S. EPA itself recognized that it was difficult for some states to
meet federal standards merely by reducing emissions in their own state. As a result,
the Ozone Transport Assessment Group (OTAG), a partnership between the U.S.
EPA, the Environmental Council of the States (ECOS) (37 easternmost states and the
District of Columbia), and several industry and en
vironmental groups, was set up in
1995 (and concluded in 1997) to develop a mechanism to reduce ozone buildup due
to interstate ozone transport, particularly in the northeast United States. In 1997, dur-
ing the period of OTAG, eight northeastern states filed petitions under Section 126 of
the Clear Air Act Amendments requesting the U.S. EPA to take action against 22
upwind states (Alabama, Connecticut, Delawa
re, Georgia, Illinois, Indiana, Kentucky,
Massachusetts, Maryland, Michigan, Missouri, North Carolina, New Jersey, New
York, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, South Carolina, Tennessee, Virginia,
Wisconsin, and West Virginia) and the District of Columbia for emitting excess
oxides of nitrogen [NO
x
(g)]. Such emissions were suspected of exacerbating ozone in
the petitioning states. In September 1998, the U.S. EPA implemented a rule [known
as the NO
x
(g) SIP Call] that required these 22 states and the District of Columbia to
submit SIPs that addressed the regional transport of ozone. The rule required reduc-
tions of NO
x
(g) but not reactive organic gases (ROGs) in these states by 2003.
Transboundary pollution between the United States and Canada is formally recog-
nized through the Canada/U.S.
Air Quality Agreement. Article V of the agreement
states that Canada must notify the United States of any proposed projects within 100
km of the border that would be likely to emit more than 90 tons/year of SO
2
(g),
NO
x
(g), CO(g), TSP, or ROGs. On a smaller scale, the United States and Mexico
implemented a cooperative study, the Big Bend Regional Preliminary Visibility Study,
to examine causes of visibility reduction in Big Bend National Park. In 1998, this pre-
liminary study concluded that sources in both the United States and Mexico degraded
visibility in the park, depending on the wind conditions.
8.1.11. Smog Alerts
Because ozone is a criteria pollutant and its mixing ratios exceed federal and state
standards more than do those of any other pollutant and because high levels of ozone
are often good indicators of the severity of photochemical smog problems, many cities
in the U.S. and now worldwide issue smog alerts when ozone levels reach certain
plateaus. Smog alert levels exist for pollutants aside from ozone as well. Table 8.3
INTERNATIONAL REGULATION OF URBAN SMOG SINCE THE 1940s 219