ICOLD Bulletin **: The Specification and Quality Control of Concrete for Dams
Revision 7.0
15 of 71
March 2006
international standards. Others may be sub-standard in one or more ways. Specification of
processes and concrete mixtures can overcome such defects and produce adequate concrete.
Where the aggregate source is known to be of good quality, the specification can be based on
published standards such as ACI 221 or ASTM C-33.
The physical properties of the rock in the quarry or borrow area are normally measured in the
design phase. Tests are carried out to determine rock types, strengths, gradings, particle shapes,
temperatures, modulus, thermal properties, freeze-thaw resistance, abrasion resistance, specific
gravity, porosity, water absorption, moisture content and the content of impurities. The chemical
soundness of the rock is also investigated and includes tests for alkali-silica reaction (ASR),
sulphate resistance and others. Some of these tests may be carried out during construction to
ensure that the source material and the aggregate produced conform to the design assumptions as
embodied in the specifications. Test frequencies will depend on the consistency of the source.
In some quarries more than one rock type is present and some material on its own might not
conform to specified standards, but might do so when blended with better rock.
Poor or variable sources
Aggregate derived from poorer and variable sources require particular specification that may
differ from standards in various respects. Aggregate soundness, particle shape, absorption and
the presence of deleterious substances and reactive minerals may have to be dealt with both with
respect to quantity and allowable variation. Aggregate that does not conform to proven standards
may have consequences for aggregate processing and transport as well as the proportions of the
concrete mixture with admixtures. The use of weak aggregates should not be eliminated just
because some properties do not comply with common practice or established standards. Essential
for the acceptance of such marginal material is an extensive test program. It is evident that
marginal material needs testing of the product in which it is used (concrete) in addition to testing
the aggregate parameters. Without an intensive test program it would be irresponsible to accept
such material.
Some aggregate may give excessive breakage of particles during handling or because of time-
dependent climatic deterioration that will change the gradation and produce fines. To some
extent, this can be accommodated by re-screening and possibly washing prior to batching. Some
aggregate sources yield flaky and elongated particles. Particle shape can be modified during
aggregate processing by introducing particular crushers and by crusher adjustment. The required
mortar and cementitious material contents may increase if aggregate with poor particle shape is
used, with attendant consequences for temperature rise, shrinkage, cracking potential and cost.
Mixtures of hard and soft alluvial gravel have been used as an aggregate source in some
circumstances. Crushing may reduce the unsuitable soft material to a fine fraction that can be
removed by screening and washing. Further crushing of the harder material can then yield usable
aggregate.
Aggregate grading
The specification will typically include required grading bands for each aggregate size and
possibly composite gradations after batching. These gradations may be taken from codes and
formulas or may be derived or modified by testing. Initially, the allowable gradation bands may
be relatively broad and consideration may be given to reducing the allowable variation once the
manufacturing process has commenced. In this context the composite gradation is important. The
number of aggregate sizes will affect the possibility of maintaining the composite gradation
within tight limits, even with considerable variation in the gradation of each aggregate size. Up