Take a train of 32 pulses, for example (Fig. 31). Suppose
the interpulse period is 100 times the pulse width. The
duration of the train, then, will be roughly 31 x 100 =
3100 times the duration of a single pulse, making the null-
to-null bandwidth of the line only 1/3100 that of a single
pulse.
5
It is instructive to consider the effect of deleting every
other pulse in this train. Because the length of the pulse
train is essentially the same, the phasors for the remaining
16 pulses would still cancel at almost the same frequency;
so the null-to-null bandwidth would be about the same.
Since there would be only half as many pulses, however,
the amplitude of the filter output would be only half as
great. Finally, since the PRF would be only half as great,
the pulses would produce an output from the filter at
twice as many points within the envelope established by
the pulse width. How do we explain why the pulse train
produces an output at intervals equal to the PRF in the
first place?
Repetition of Spectral Lines. As we have seen, when a
train of pulses is applied to a filter, what causes the output
of the filter to fall off as the filter is tuned away from the
carrier frequency of the pulses is the pulse-to-pulse differ-
ence in the phase of the carrier, as seen by the filter. But,
since phase angles are repeated every 360°, there is no way
of telling whether the phase of any one pulse is the same as
that of the preceding pulse or has been shifted by some
multiple of 360°.
A pulse-to-pulse shift of 360° amounts to one cycle per
interpulse period, corresponding to an increment of fre-
quency equal to the PRF (Fig. 32). Consequently, there may
be very little difference between a filter’s response to a pulse
train whose carrier frequency is the same as the filter fre-
quency and its response to a pulse train whose carrier fre-
quency is some integer multiple of the PRF above or below
the filter frequency. In fact, the only difference is that due to
the phase shift occurring from cycle to cycle over the dura-
tion of each pulse. Unless the multiple of the PRF is very
high or the pulse width is a fairly large fraction of the inter-
pulse period—i.e., unless the carrier frequency is near one
end or the other of the envelope established by the pulse
width—the difference is slight.
Mathematical Explanation of the Pulsed Spectrum
For those having at least a nodding acquaintance with
calculus, the spectrum of a pulsed signal is derived math-
ematically in the following panel. If your interest is not so
mathematical, then skip ahead to “Results” on page 230.
CHAPTER 17 Mysteries of the Pulsed Spectrum Unveiled
225
31. If every other pulse in a train is deleted, the output is reduced,
but the bandwidth remains essentially unchanged.
32. Pulse trains whose carrier frequencies equal the filter frequen-
cy, f
A
, (top) and f
A
plus the PRF (bottom). Only difference in
the outputs produced by the two trains is that due to the cycle-
to-cycle phase shift within each pulse of the second train.
5. Although the train contains
32 pulses, it is only one pulse
width longer than 31 inter-
pulse periods.