
12
D.
T.
COLBERT
and
R.
E.
SMALLEY
inated as broken fragments of sintered nanotubes, the
amount
of
remaining material reflects the degree of
sintering.
Our examinations
of
oxygen-purified deposits led
to construction of a model of nanotube growth in the
arc in which the nanotubes play an active role in
sus-
taining the arc plasma, rather than simply being a
passive product[2]. Imaging unpurified nanotube-rich
arc deposit from the top by scanning electron micros-
copy (SEM) revealed
a
roughly hexagonal lattice
of
50-micron diameter circles spaced
-50
microns apart.
After oxidative treatment the circular regions were seen
to
have etched away, leaving
a
hole. More strikingly,
when the deposit was etched after being cleaved ver-
tically
to
expose the inside
of
the deposit, SEM imag-
ing showed that columns the diameter
of
the circles
had been etched all the way from the top to the bot-
tom of the deposit, leaving only the intervening mate-
rial. Prior SEM images of the column material (zone 1)
showed that the nanotubes there were highly aligned
in the direction
of
the electric field (also the direction
of deposit growth), whereas nanotubes in the sur-
rounding region (zone
2)
lay in tangles, unaligned with
the field[2]. Since zone
1
nanotubes tend
to
be in much
greater contact with one another, they are far more
susceptible
to
sintering than those in zone
2,
resulting
in the observed preferential oxidative etch of zone
1.
These observations consummated in
a
growth
model that confers on the millions of aligned zone
1
nanotubes the role of field emitters, a role they play
so
effectively that they are the dominant source of
electron injection into the plasma. In response, the
plasma structure, in which current flow becomes con-
centrated above zone 1, enhances and sustains the
growth of the field emission source-that is, zone
1
nanotubes. A convection cell is set up in order
to
al-
low the inert helium gas, which is swept down by col-
lisions with carbon ions toward zone
1,
to return
to
the plasma. The helium flow carries unreacted carbon
feedstock out of zone
1,
where it
can
add to the grow-
ing zone 2 nanotubes. In the model, it is the size and
spacing of these convection cells in the plasma that de-
termine the spacing of the zone
l
columns in a hex-
agonal lattice.
3.
FIELD
EMISSION FROM
AN
ATOMIC
WIRE
Realization
of
the critical importance played by
emission in our arc growth model added impetus to
investigations already underway to characterize nano-
tube field emission behavior in
a
more controlled man-
ner. We had begun working
with
individual nanotubes
in the hope
of
using them as seed crystals for con-
trolled, continuous growth (this remains an active
goal). This required developing techniques for harvest-
ing nanotubes from arc deposits, and attaching them
with good mechanical and electrical connection to
macroscopic manipulators[2,8,9]. The resulting nano-
electrode was then placed in a vacuum chamber in
which the nanotube tip could be heated by applica-
tion
of
Ar+-laser light
(514.5
nm) while the potential
bias was controlled relative
to
an opposing electrode,
and if desired, reactive gases could be introduced.
Two classes
of
emission behavior were found. An
inactivated state, in which the emission current in-
creased upon laser heating at a fixed potential bias,
was consistent with well understood thermionic field
emission models. Figure la displays the emission cur-
rent as the laser beam is blocked and unblocked, re-
vealing a 300-fold thermal enhancement upon heating.
Etching the nanotube tip with oxygen while the tube
was laser heated to
1500°C
and held at
-75
V
bias
produced an activated state with exactly the opposite
behavior, shown in Fig. 2b; the emission current
in-
creased
by nearly two orders of magnitude when the
laser beam was blocked! Once we eliminated the pos-
sibility that species chemisorbed on the tip might be
responsible for this behavior, the explanation had to
invoke a structure built only of carbon whose sharp-
ness would concentrate the field, thus enhancing the
emission current.
As
a result
of
these studies[9], a dra-
matic and unexpected picture has emerged of the
nanotube as field emitter, in which the emitting source
is an atomic wire composed of
a
single chain of car-
bon atoms that has been unraveled from the tip by the
force of the applied electric field (see Fig.
2).
These
carbon wires can be pulled out from the end of the
nanotube only once the ragged edges of the nanotube
layers have been exposed. Laser irradiation causes the
chains
to
be clipped from the open tube ends, result-
ing in low emission when the laser beam is unblocked,
but fresh ones are pulled out once the laser is blocked.
This unraveling behavior is reversible and reproducible.
4.
THE
STRUCTURE
OF
AN OPEN
NANOTUBE
TIP
A portion
of
our
ongoing work focusing on sphe-
roidal fderenes, particularly metallofullerenes, utilized
the same method of production as was originally used
in the discovery of fullerenes, the laser-vaporization
method, except for the modification of placing the
flow tube in an oven to create better annealing con-
ditions for fullerene formation. Since we knew that at
the typical
1200°C
oven temperature, carbon clusters
readily condensed and annealed to spheroidal fuller-
enes (in yields close to
40%),
we were astonished to
find, upon transmission electron micrographic exam-
ination of the collected soots, multiwalled nanotubes
with few or no defects up to
300
nm
long[lO]! How,
we asked ourselves, was it possible for
a
nanotube
precursor
to
remain open under conditions known
to
favor its closing, especially considering the absence of
extrinsic agents such as
a
strong electric field, metal
particles, or impurities
to
hold the tip open for growth
and elongation?
The only conclusion we find tenable is that an
in-
trinsic
factor of the nanotube was stabilizing it against
closure, specifically, the bonding of carbon atoms to
edge atoms of adjacent layers, as illustrated in Fig.
2.
Tight-binding calculations[l 1
J
indicate that such sites
are energetically preferred over direct addition to the
hexagonal lattice
of
a single layer by as much as
1.5
eV