14.4
On
the
Radius of Delaunay Polytopes
211
Proposition
14.3.5.
Let
(X,
d)
be
a connected strongly
even
distance space.
If
(X,
d) is
hypermetric
with
associated
Delaunay
polytope
Pd
generating the lattice
Ld,
then
Ld
is a root lattice.
Proof.
Let i E X
f-+
Vi
E
V(Pd)
denote a representation of
(X,
d) in Ld. As
the
distance space
(X,
d)
is connected and strongly even, the lattice
Ld
is generated
by
the
set
{Vi
-
Vj
I
i,j
E X and
d(i,j)
2}.
Hence, Ld
is
a root lattice. I
As an application,
we
can
characterize the connected strongly even distance
spaces which are hypermetric, or iI-embeddable.
The
following Theorems 14.3.6
and
14.3.7
are
due, respectively, to Terwiliger and Deza
[1987J
and Deza and
Grishukhin
[1993]. An application to graphs will be formulated in Section 17.1.
Theorem
14.3.6.
Let
(X,
d)
be
a connected strongly
even
distance space.
The
following
assertions
are equivalent.
(i)
(X,
d) is
hypermetric.
(ii)
(X,
!d)
is an
isometric
subspace
of
a dire-et product
of
half-cube graphs
!H(n,2)
(n 2 7), cocktail-party graphs
Knx2
(n 2 7),
and
copies
of
the
Gosset
graph G56.
Proof.
(i) (ii) From Proposition 14.3.5, the Delaunay polytope
Pd
associ-
ated
with
(X,
d)
is generating in a root lattice. Therefore, from Proposition
14.3.3,
The
Delaunay polytope space
(V(Pd),
d~))
coincides
with
the
graphic
space
(V(Pd),
dH(Pd)) which, using Figure 14.3.1, is a direct
product
of Johnson
graphs, cocktail-party graphs, half-cube graphs, copies
of
G
27
and
G
56
•
The
result now follows using Remark 14.3.2.
The
implication (ii)
===>
(i) is obvious.
I
Theorem
14.3.7.
Let
(X,
d)
be
a connected strongly
even
distance space.
The
following
assertions
are equivalent.
(i)
(X,
d) is
isometrically
il-embeddable.
(ii)
(X,
~d)
is
an
isometric
subspace
of
a product
of
half-cube graphs
and
cocktail-party graphs. I
Theorem 14.3.7 can be proved in
the
same way as Theorem 14.3.6, using
Proposition
14.1.10
and
the
fact
that
the
graphs G
27
and G
S6
are not iI-graphs.
In
the
(main) subcase of graphic metric spaces, another proof was given by
Shpectorov
[1993];
it
is elementary (it does not use Delaunay polytopes)
but
longer.
We
will present
the
latter
proof in
Chapter
21.
14.4
On
the
Radius
of
Delaunay
Polytopes
We
present here several results which
in
some cases, a more precise informa-
tion
on
the
radius
of
Delaunay polytopes.
The
first result is a
partial
converse to