370 Discrete Dynamical Systems
(d) Show that f
∞
maps permutes the 2
n
intervals of I
n
in a single cycle, so that the
orbit of a point x ∈ I
n
intersects all 2
n
of these intervals.
(e) Use (d) to show that the orbit of every point in C is dense in C. In particular, f
∞
is topologically transitive on C.
(f) Use (d) to show that f
∞
does not have sensitive dependence on initial conditions.
11.6. Topological Conjugacy
In this section, we will discuss how to show that two dynamical systems, possi-
bly on different spaces, are essentially the same. By essentially the same, we mean
that they have the same dynamical system properties. It is convenient to introduce
two new notions that allow us to express the fact that two dynamical systems are
the same map up to a reparametrization.
The notion of homeomorphism encodes the fact that two spaces have the same
topology, meaning roughly that convergent sequences correspond but distances be-
tween points need not correspond.
11.6.1. DEFINITION. Two subsets of normed vectorspaces X and Y are said to
be homeomorphic if there is a continuous, one-to-one, and onto map σ : X → Y
such that the inverse map σ
−1
is also continuous. The map σ is called a homeo-
morphism.
11.6.2. EXAMPLE. Let f be a continuous map from [0, 1] into itself, and con-
sider when this is a homeomorphism. To be onto, there must be points a and b such
that f(a) = 0 and f(b) = 1. By the Intermediate Value Theorem (Theorem 5.6.1),
f maps [a, b] onto [0, 1]. If [a, b] were a proper subset of [0, 1], then the remaining
points would have to be mapped somewhere and f would fail to be one-to-one.
Hence we have either f(0) = 0 and f(1) = 1 or f(0) = 1 and f(1) = 0. For
convenience, let us assume that it is the former for a moment. By the same token,
f must be strictly increasing. Indeed, if there were x < y such that f(y) ≤ f(x),
then the Intermediate Value Theorem again yields a point z such that 0 ≤ z ≤ x
such that f(z) = f (y), destroying the one-to-one property.
Conversely, if f is a continuous strictly increasing function such that f(0) = 0
and f(1) = 1, then the same argument shows that f is one-to-one and onto. So the
inverse function f
−1
is well defined. Moreover, it is evident that f
−1
is also strictly
increasing and maps [0, 1] onto itself. By Corollary 5.7.3, the only discontinuities
of monotone functions are jump discontinuities. Hence f
−1
is also continuous. So
f is a homeomorphism of [0, 1]. Likewise, if f is a continuous strictly decreasing
function such that f(0) = 1 and f(1) = 0, then it is a homeomorphism.
This example makes it look as though the order on the real line is crucial to es-
tablishing the continuity of the inverse. However, this result is actually more basic
and depends crucially on compactness. There are two natural proofs of this result