the North (the rich industrialized countries) and the
South (the poor developing countries) could lead to
political and environmental instability, and it was
therefore in the interests of both to allow the South
greater control of its destiny.
0021 The questions of international food trade, food aid,
and the role of international agencies in relation to
poverty reduction and nutrition are therefore highly
contentious political issues that can be touched on
only briefly here.
Food Trade
0022 The economies of the developing countries are affected
by the policies of the major producers of food and
other essential commodities. For example, the ‘world
food crisis’ in 1973, which was marked by soaring
prices of grain and other food commodities on the
world market, was the result of several factors. These
included climate, the USA policy of deliberately redu-
cing its grain stocks by taking land out of production to
maintain producer prices, and Russia’s sudden in-
crease in its grain purchases from the world market
to support its policy of livestock production. These,
and the oil crisis, caused great economic hardship for
many developing countries that depended on imports
for their food supply, and led to a spate of policies to
increase food self-sufficiency.
0023 Similarly, the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP)
of the European Union (EU) has had a controversial
impact on the Third World through price fluctuations
caused by periodic dumping of surplus food on the
world market and through tariff barriers that restrict
imports. Some trade concessions were made by the
EU to the developing countries through the Lome
Convention, but this provided little protection in
practice. (See European Union: European Food Law
Harmonization.)
0024 These protectionist policies are the subject of inter-
national bargaining for free trade that is carried out in
periodic rounds of talks in the council on the General
Agreement on Trades and Tariffs (GATT). However,
these mainly reflect the interests of the seven most eco-
nomically powerful nations, the USA, Canada, Ger-
many, France, Italy, the UK, and Japan (the G7) and
only in the 1986–1992 round included food commod-
ities, prompted by the food price policies that are detri-
mentaltothe food trade oftheUSAandother countries.
0025 GATT was succeeded by the World Trade Organ-
ization (WTO) from 1995, which, by the end of the
decade, had 134 members, accounting for 90% of
world trade and 30 others, including China, negotiat-
ing for membership. The costs of participation are
high for the poorest countries, which means that the
agenda is still dominated by the large economies.
Food Aid
0026Food and other international aid has often been used
as a political weapon, given to politically friendly
countries, such as South-east Asia in the late 60s and
to Egypt and Syria in 1974, and withdrawn from those
that do not conform to the policies of the donor coun-
tries, such as Chile in 1971 and Mozambique in 1981.
0027Food aid has also received much criticism on the
grounds that it has been used by the donor countries
to dispose of surpluses and to penetrate food markets
of developing countries in order to create a long-term
trade demand, that it is unreliable, involves excessive
opportunity costs, reinforces expensive subsidy pro-
grams, provides opportunities for corruption, and is
used by governments to keep urban prices down,
thereby acting as a disincentive to agriculture and
maintaining rural poverty and malnutrition.
0028Food aid and capital intensive agricultural policies
are also seen to contribute to the rapid rural urban
migration seen in so many developing countries,
where cities are unable to cope with the rate of influx
to provide adequate housing, sanitation, water
supply, and employment. As a result, the migrants
can often only scrape a living through petty trading,
begging, and low wage employment. This influx
undermines minimum wage legislation or enforce-
ment and keeps the cost of labor, and therefore
incomes, low. The consequent inability of the urban
poor to purchase adequate diets, and the insanitary
living conditions, result in extensive urban malnutri-
tion in many developing countries. Such effects are
seen to negate the short-term benefits of food aid used
in famine situations, and of child-feeding and food-
for-work projects that act as welfare benefits or re-
source transfers to the poor.
0029The structure of food aid has altered since it
became a permanent international transfer mechan-
ism in the 1954 when the USA enacted the public law
PL480, referring to sales to ‘friendly nations,’ to be
paid initially with local money deposited as counter-
part funds for use by the USA or with their approval
(Title 1), and donations for famine relief and projects
(Title II). The latter represents a small proportion
contrary to the popular belief that all aid is a gift.
Initially, the USA supplied nearly all aid, but now the
EU, Japan, Canada, Australia, and other countries
contribute about 50%. About 35% of food aid is
channeled through the multilateral World Food Pro-
gram for feeding projects; this reduces political bias.
However, 40% is still bilateral, and several countries,
such as Bangladesh, remain dependent on food aid
and, therefore, politically dependent on the donor.
There is widespread recognition of the need for
reform of food aid and its international infrastructure
POLITICS AND NUTRITION 4613