
and modern advances in the arena of functional tests
of human nutriture.
Historical Perspective
0003 Clinical assessment of nutritional status by examin-
ing signs and symptoms is the most venerable ap-
proach; in fact, the syndromes of scurvy, beriberi,
pellagra, rickets, and anemia had been recognized
clinically long before the chemical nature and etio-
logical roles of ascorbic acid, thiamin, nicotinic acid,
cholecalciferol, and the hematinic nutrients (iron,
folic acid, vitamin B
12
) were discovered. (See Anemia
(Anaemia): Iron-deficiency Anemia; Scurvy; refer to
individual nutrients.)
0004 As sensitivity (the ability of a test to find all
affected individuals) and specificity (the ability of a
test to reject all unaffected individuals) of a diagnostic
approach must always be considered, clinical exam-
ination has its limitations. In terms of sensitivity,
clinical examination is a poor index of nutritional
deficiency, as clinical manifestations emerge late in
the process and only in those most deficient. They
represent the tip of the iceberg. The specificity of
clinical diagnosis is variable. Whereas scurvy and
rickets are unmistakable, anemia has multiple
nutritional bases and a host of causes unrelated to
nutrition.
0005 The twentieth century saw the chemical identifica-
tion of the essential nutrients, producing reliable
assays to measure nutrients or their metabolites in
biological fluids and tissues. The first-line approach
for the detection of deficiencies and excess of nutri-
ents shifted from clinical examination to laboratory
tests, with the realization that changes in body
reserves and tissue content of nutrients decrease
before the clinical manifestations of deficiency are
expressed. Similarly, in terms of excessive accumula-
tion, an increased burden of a nutrient occurs before
overt toxic signs and symptoms develop. Most, but
not all, biochemical procedures generate static indices
of nutritional status. Assessment of individual status
is pursued by constructing a normative reference dis-
tribution for a healthy, well-nourished population as
the standard, and assigning cut-off criteria on the
high and low ends that represent excess and defi-
ciency, respectively. For a population assessment, the
deviation of its biochemical distribution from that of
the reference population is gauged, or the prevalence
of individuals with values outside the criteria levels is
tabulated.
0006 The concept of functional assessment was added to
the lexicon of nutritional status evaluation in the
1970s, although its origins go much further back to
the Hess tourniquet test for capillary fragility for
incipient scurvy of the early twentieth century, dark-
adaptation tests for vitamin A status, and prothrom-
bin- and coagulation-time tests for vitamin K
adequacy of the middle of the century. However, in
1978 Study Team IX of the Committee on Inter-
national Nutrition Programs of the National Acad-
emy of Sciences of the USA, chaired by the late
Professor Doris Howes Calloway, issued a report
arguing that the intactness of the physiological and
behavioral functions that depended on nutrients was
of more interest to policy-makers in governments and
development assistant agencies than were the levels of
nutrients in the body. In 1983, Noel Solomons and
Lindsay Allen produced a systematic classification of
tests of nutritional status based on measures of
physiological performance or behavioral responses.
Definitions
0007This article compares and contrasts two types of in-
dices that seek to determine the nutriture of
individuals: static and functional indices.
Static Indices
0008Static indices are tests directed at assessing the quan-
titative content of a nutrient in the organism, either
as whole-body reserves or as tissue concentrations.
They represent chemically measurements of the
nutrient itself, some active or inactive metabolite, or
a complex, such as hemoglobin, that contains the
nutrient. In the instance of iron status, for example,
hemoglobin is a surrogate for iron in target tissues,
whereas ferritin reflects its presence in body iron
stores. Serum iron, transform saturation, and iron
in hair or nails are all examples of static indices of
iron status. (See Anemia (Anaemia): Iron-deficiency
Anemia.)
Functional Indices
0009Functional indices of nutritional status are those
behavioral, physiological, or biochemical functions
of the organism dependent on the adequate availabil-
ity of a nutrient or resulting from the homeostatic
regulatory processes that maintain body stores and
harmonic internal distribution of some nutrients.
0010As mentioned, perhaps the first example of a func-
tional test of nutritional status was the capillary fra-
gility test of Hess, followed in the 1930s by dark
adaptation tests based on Wald’s elucidation of the
dependence of retinal cone function on vitamin A.
With the advent of isolated radioisotopes and
whole-body counting, tests of the absorption, reten-
tion, and distribution of several nutrients have been
developed. With the molecular biology, genomic,
and proteonomic revolutions, new and unexplored
NUTRITIONAL ASSESSMENT/Functional Tests 4191