
heads for helical scan, and inductive write/MR read
based heads for linear recording formats. All are
similar in that they are multicomponent and are con-
structed from materials which are hard. With current
thin film head constructions the allowable wear is
very small, being perhaps less than a micron over the
life of the component. The tribology of these hard
materials is still at a very immature stage. The ma-
terials generally have high elastic modulus, high
fracture strength, high chemical stability, and high
thermal stability, but because of the ionic and/or
covalent nature of their bonds, they are also brittle.
The high chemical stability means that interfacial
adhesion and the shear strength of the junction are
low compared with bulk cohesive forces, hence ad-
hesive transfer from head to tape does not occur.
The surface roughnesses and particle sizes associ-
ated with current tape formats ensure that conven-
tional two-body abrasive wear cannot take place. The
materials are not ideally brittle, however, and plastic
flow and hence abrasion can occur with large third-
body particles. Polishing (a form of adhesive at the
nanoscale), however, can take place. Here, the hard-
ness of the tape particles need to fulfil the Richardson
(1967) criteria, but can be relatively low. Conven-
tional polishing normally occurs when small hard
particles imbedded into an elastic backing medium
are passed at high speed and low load over the sur-
face to be treated. This is exactly the situation which
occurs in head/ particulate media contact. Polishing
has been described by Suh (1986) in terms of micro-
delamination of the wearing surface. The soft mag-
netic materials, for example NiFe, CoZrTa alloys,
used in MIG and sandwich heads, and the MR
elements and shields in linear recording heads, are of
similar hardness to the ceramics and exhibit similar
wear mechanisms.
Reaves and Sullivan (1992) showed that this form
of wear was the dominant mechanism in ferrite video
heads, Harrison et al. (1999) and Bijker et al. (2000)
have shown that it is also the dominant mechanism in
terms of volume of material removed in sandwich
heads and linear recording heads, respectively. In
none of the cases, however, was it the most important
mechanism in terms of signal degradation. In the
case of the ferrite head, signal degradation was
caused by gap damage due to third bodies becoming
entrapped between head and tape, and in the case of
the sandwich and linear heads was caused by pole
tip recession. This mechanism is operative in glass,
ceramics, and ferrites. With ferrite single crystals,
however, there is the additional effect of crystal
orientation. It is far more pronounced in some iron
oxide or metal particle media than it is in chromium
dioxide media and this may be explained in terms of
plastic deformation in the ferrite crystal. This effect
must be taken into consideration when, for magnetic
reasons, the two halves of a head are aligned in dif-
ferent directions. In this case the different wear rates
lead to pole piece height differences which result in
spacing loss.
Although abrasive wear should not be possible in
these systems, relatively deep scratches are observed
on heads and these are obviously caused by three-
body abrasion, possibly as a result of agglomerate
debris from the tape becoming entrapped between
head and media. Such scratches not only change the
surface topography, which may effect spacing, but
may also destroy MR elements. If the loading in
particulate tape becomes too high and the complex
modulus falls, more such third bodies will be formed.
Third-body abrasion will be even more important in
GMR heads, when the damage could have cata-
strophic consequences for head performance.
7.2 Differential Wear and Pole Tip Recession
In terms of signal loss, differential wear is of greater
importance than absolute wear, since this introduces
spacing between media and the active areas of the
head. When using a combination of different mate-
rials in the recording head, it is very difficult to ex-
actly match wear rates. Since there is poor correlation
between static measurements of elastic/plastic prop-
erties and wear over a range of different materials,
model experiments must be devised, but even then it
is not certain that the modes of wear measured in
these experiments are appropriate in practice. The
choice of materials is a compromise and the best in-
dividual material may not be suitable for use in a
given head application because of mismatch in wear
properties. This is the reason that a number of two-
phase ceramics are used in head applications. Even
with careful choice of materials, differential wear still
occurs and is a major cause of spacing loss.
Harrison et al. (1999) have studied pole tip reces-
sion in sandwich video heads, where the recession is
caused by differential wear. The soft magnetic metal
sandwich is worn at a greater rate than the sur-
rounding ceramic. In many circumstances this results
in hollowing out the metal to a depth where contact
with the media cannot occur. In these heads the soft
magnetic materials and ceramic body have compara-
ble wear rates, measured by simulation tests. Harri-
son et al. (1999) found that the major material
removal mechanism for soft magnetic materials
and ceramics was nanoadhesion (polishing), but this
could not account for the recession. This was the re-
sult of two separate effects: fatigue wear of the ce-
ramics, which resulted in the plucking out of laminar
crystallite-sized particles from the surface, and the
entrapment of these particles in the soft magnetic
sandwich region, which produced erosive wear. The
ensuing pole tip recession was then a function of
the relative fracture toughness rather than hardness.
The production of fatigue ‘‘pull outs’’ from the cera-
mic is probably increased for multiphase ceramics.
641
Magnetic Reco rding: Flexible Media, Tribology