
The general composition of the cuprate supercon-
ductors is
B
bþ
½ðCuO
2
Þ
ð2dÞ
n
C
cþ
n1
ð1Þ
where n ¼ 1; 2; 3; y; c ¼ 2 or 3, and b ¼ c þ n
ð2 d cÞ. The block layer B is a cationic metal oxi-
de layer. It is followed by either a single (CuO
2
)
(2d)
layer or a stack consisting of n such layers with cat-
ions C sandwiched in between. So far, the cations C
are Ca
2 þ
,orRE
3 þ
where RE ¼Y, La or any of
the lanthanides (see Superconducting Thin Films:
Materials, Preparation, and Properties).
The main families of cuprate superconductors de-
rive from
(i) La
2x
Sr
x
CuO
4y
which in the systematics of (1)
would be (La
2x
Sr
x
O
2y
)
(2d) þ
(CuO
2
)
(2d)
with
n ¼ 1 and dEx for yE0; related is M
2
CuO
2
X
2
or (M
2
X
2
)
(2d) þ
(CuO
2
)
(2d)
with M ¼(Ca
1x
Na
x
)
or Sr and X ¼F, Cl, or Br;
(ii) RE
1
Ba
2
Cu
3
O
6 þx
which would be ðBa
2þ
2
ðCuO
2þx
Þ
ð3þ2dÞ
Þ½ CuO
2
ðÞ
ð2dÞ
2
RE
3þ
with n ¼ 2
and d ¼ 0 for xo0:3 and then increasing to dE0:2
for xE1; and
(iii) B
ð2ndÞþ
½ðCuO
2
Þ
ð2dÞ
n
Ca
2þ
n1
; n ¼ 1; 2; 3; y
with B ¼(Bi, Pb)
2
Sr
2
O
4 þx
or TlBa
2
O
2.5 þx
or
Tl
2
Ba
2
O
4 þx
or HgBa
2
O
2 þx
, and d increases with in-
creasing x; Tl may be replaced by B and Hg by Cu or
Au; Ca may be replaced by Y, Dy, Er.
The oxygen in the metal oxide block layers B is
more or less volatile. Above, it is written in such a
way that in all cases the doping level of the cuprate
planes is d ¼ 0 for x ¼ 0 or some value of x close to
zero. The magnetic properties of these undoped or
weakly doped cuprates is a very topical problem of its
own because they are more or less ideal model sys-
tems of low-dimensional Heisenberg magnets (see
Johnston 1997). This is not particularly considered
here in this article. Among them are also cuprate
structures which are different from the CuO
2
planar
structure (chain and ladder structures), some of
which become superconductors when doped. They
are also not considered here (cf. Mu
¨
ller-Buschbaum
(1977) for a structure chemical systematics of all
cuprates).
The cation C is always fully ionized; its valence
orbitals are unoccupied. The metal oxide block layer
B is, depending on composition and on x, either in-
sulating or metallic. The essential conducting com-
ponent which also carries superconductivity is the
(CuO
2
)
(2d)
layer which is doped by charge transfer
to the block layer. The doping level d may be positive
(hole doping) or negative (electron doping). Electron
doping is less frequent and is found, in parti-
cular, in the family (i) with B ¼(Nd
2x
Ce
x
O
2y
)or
B ¼(Pr
2x
Ce
x
O
2y
) instead of B ¼(La
2x
Sr
x
O
2y
).
The tetravalent Ce donates one electron.
In traditional metal physics, the electronic struc-
ture is characterized by a quasiparticle band structure
where at low temperature, T-0, the quasiparticles
have a sharp energy–momentum dispersion relation
close to the chemical potential (Fermi level e
F
). These
also develop a decay rate proportional to the square
of their excitation energy, je e
F
j, due to energy and
momentum scattering. This behavior is meant if one
speaks of a Fermi liquid (FL) with an arbitrary dis-
persion relation. The quasiparticle momenta at the
Fermi level constitute the Fermi surface (FS) which is
measured through quantum oscillations in the mag-
netic susceptibility (de Haas–van Alphen effect) or
in magnetotransport. Experimental evidence on the
quasiparticle dispersion relation close to the Fermi
level is obtained both from thermal equilibrium
properties such as specific heat or magnetic suscep-
tibility and from transport properties. However, the
high-energy electronic excitation spectrum (on an eV
scale) is obtained mainly from electron removal by
photoemission (hole excitations) and from electron
injection by inverse photoemission, as well as from
electron excitation by electron-energy-loss spectro-
scopy (EELS) or by x-ray absorption (XAS).
This picture remains even valid for strongly corre-
lated metals like heavy fermion (f-electron) systems;
only the energy–momentum dispersion relation is
scaled down by up to 2 orders of magnitude. There
are many experimental indications that this picture
breaks down in a certain region of the phase diagram
of the superconducting cuprates: while the thermal
equilibrium properties are still reminiscent of a
(weakly renormalized) metal, the energy dependence
of the quasiparticle scattering rate seems to have a
singular behavior and the quasiparticle spectral
weight seems to fade away.
A generic doping level–temperature phase diagram
of the layered cuprates is shown in Fig. 1. More or
less understood are the undoped antiferromagnet
(AF) phase ðdE0Þ as a charge transfer insulator and
the FL phase (
j
d
j
40.2) as a normal metal. A recom-
mended early review of the mean-field quasiparticle
band structures, where the mean field is taken to be
the Kohn-Sham potential of density functional the-
ory, is that of Pickett (1989).
1. The Undoped Cuprate
For d ¼ 0, the valence electron number per unit cell
of the (CuO
2
)
2
complex is 11 þ2 4 þ2 ¼21 and
hence odd. The mean field band structure for an odd
valence electron number per unit cell proposes a me-
tallic state with a half-filled band at least above a
possible spin magnetic order temperature. Experi-
mentally, the undoped cuprates are insulators with a
gap of B1–2 eV. Below the Ne
´
el temperature T
N
which, dependent on the block layer, is between
250 K and 540 K, they order antiferromagnetically
with an ordered spin moment /mSðT -0Þ between
0.25m
Bohr
and 0.64m
Bohr
at the Cu site. Order is due to
282
High-T
c
Superconductors: Electronic Structure