IX. Financial Planning and
31. Cash Management
In the United States there are two systems for making large-value electronic
payments—Fedwire (a gross system) and CHIPS (a net system). Fedwire is op-
erated by the Federal Reserve system and connects over 10,000 financial institu-
tions in the United States to the Fed and thereby to each other. Suppose Bank A
instructs the Fed to transfer $1 million from its account with the Fed to the ac-
count of Bank B. Bank A’s account is debited immediately and Bank B’s account
is credited at the same time. Fedwire is therefore an example of a real-time gross
settlement (RTGS) system. Most developed countries now operate RTGS systems
for large-value payments.
Real-time gross settlement suffers from a potential problem. If Bank A needs to
pay Bank B, B needs to pay C, and C needs to pay A, there is a risk that the system
could gridlock unless each bank kept a large reserve with the Fed. (A might not be
able to pay B until it has been paid by C, C can’t pay A until paid by B, and B in
turn is awaiting payment by A.) To oil the wheels, therefore, the Fed takes on the
credit risk by paying the receiving bank even if there are insufficient funds in the
account of the payer. Since each payment is final and guaranteed by the Fed, each
receiving bank can be sure that it has the money and can give its customer imme-
diate access to the funds.
Cross-border high-value payments in dollars are handled by CHIPS, which is a
privately owned system connecting 115 large domestic and foreign banks. CHIPS
accumulates payment instructions throughout the day, and at the end of the day
each bank settles up the net payment using Fedwire. This means that, if the bank
receiving payments makes the funds available to its customers during the day, it
would be at risk if the paying bank goes belly up during the day. Banks control this
risk by imposing intraday credit limits on their exposure to each other.
887
FINANCE IN THE NEWS
HOW LAIDLAW RESTRUCTURED
ITS CASH MANAGEMENT
The Canadian company, Laidlaw Inc., has more
than 4,000 facilities throughout America, operating
school bus services, ambulance services, and Grey-
hound coaches. During the 1990s the company ex-
panded rapidly through acquisition, and its number
of banking relationships multiplied until it had
1,000 separate bank accounts with more than 200
different banks. The head office had no way of
knowing how much cash was stashed away in these
accounts until the end of each quarter, when it was
able to construct a consolidated balance sheet.
To economize on the use of cash, Laidlaw’s fi-
nancial manager sought to cut the company’s aver-
age float from five days to two. At the same time
management decided to consolidate cash manage-
ment at five key banks. This enabled cash to be
zero-balanced to a single account for each division
and swept daily to Laidlaw’s disbursement bank.
Because the head office could obtain daily reports
of the company’s cash position, cash forecasting
was improved and the company could reduce its
cash needs still further.
Source: Cash management at Laidlaw is described in G. Mann and
S. Hutchison, “Driving Down Working Capital: Laidlaw’s Story,”
Canadian Treasurer Magazine, August/September 1999.