100
MANUSCRIPTS.
and of
placing
it in
its
objective
fulness before the
eye.
The
fowl
in
the
fable
did
not
see
the
value of a
gem.
He
declared he
would
rather have
one
grain
of
barley
than
the most
precious
and
valuable of
gems.
Gems
to him
were
things
he
could not
eat.
He
had no
power
of head
to
soar
higher
than the
notion of
eating
and
drinking.
A
gem
to a
bird
was
certainly
useless. There are men
who
prefer
the
possession
of material
value,
which
contributes
to their
gross
animal
life,
to
all the
precious
paintings
ever
pencilled
in ancient or
modern
times
by
Grecian,
Dutch,
Italian,
or
Spanish
artists. A
man
who
values
money
and material
riches
for
what
they
bring
of
earthly
enjoyment,
of
civic
honor,
social
state,
or
sensual
living,
cannot
appreciate
the
possession
of
precious
pictures
as
creations of intellect and works of
genius.
Of course he
may
value them as he
values bank
notes
;
but
that
is
not
intellectual
appreciation.
Painting
as well
as
music,
does
not satiate
animal
cravings,
or
satisfy
mere
earthly
tastes.
Persons
of
mind,
of
thought,
of
intelligence,
alone can
understand those works of intellectual
creation.
And how
very highly they
are valued is
plain
from the
fact that
kings
and
emperors
and
governments,
in
modern
and ancient
times,
prefer
to
have them
to
the
possession
of
hundreds of thousands
of
pounds.
The
value
of
a
language,
too,
must not
be estimated
by
its
commercial
worth. Men of mind
and of
linguistic
knowledge
alone
are
capable
of
estimating
it
at its real
value.
3.
Every
one
knows
how
highly
rare
books
are
prized
by
the
learned.
Above
all the
manuscript
works
of renowned
writers,
such
as
the Bard
of
Stratford-upon-Avon,
whose
house,
even
as
a
natural
heirloom,
has
been
purchased
(in
1847)
by
the
British Government.
Thj
manuscript
by
Dante
of the
Divina
Co:nmcdia
would