
PROPAGATION AND REFLECTION OF A SMALL-AMPLITUDE WAVE 119
Project for Further Study: When a compressible fluid of density ρ
0
is dis-
turbed in such a way that its density becomes ρ
0
+ρ
(x, t),whereρ
ρ
0
,
the density fluctuation, similar to the fluid speed, is also governed by a wave
equation
∂
2
ρ
∂t
2
= a
2
∂
2
ρ
∂x
2
(2.11.10)
This can readily be proved by combining the Euler equation (2.1.5) and the
continuity equation
∂ρ
∂t
+∇ ·(ρV) = 0 (2.11.11)
linearizing them for one-dimensional flow, and then introducing the speed of
sound a =
√
dp/dρ under the isentropic condition. For details consult, for
example, Section 3.4 of Liepmann and Roshko (1957).
Consider a 1-m-long tube of uniform cross section with both ends closed. The
tube is divided into two chambers by a diaphragm at the middle section across
which the densities are slightly different. Suppose ρ
is normalized so that it is 1
at and to the right of the diaphragm, and 0 to the left. At t = 0when∂ρ
/∂t = 0,
the diaphragm is suddenly removed and a wave system is set up in the tube.
Solve this linearized shock tube problem by finding ρ
(x, t) numerically with the
leapfrog method. Density distributions along the tube at some representative time
levels are to be plotted.
Boundary conditions for density fluctuation in this problem are determined as
follows. At a closed end u vanishes regardless of time; thus, ∂u/∂t = 0there.
This implies that ∂p/∂x = 0 and, therefore, ∂ρ
/∂x = 0 at the closed end by
considering the linearized Euler equation. On the other hand, if there were an
end open to the atmosphere, ρ
should vanish there because the density at that
location is always the same as that outside.
Computer results should show that two waves are generated at the center
after the eruption of the diaphragm: an expansion wave propagating toward the
right and a compression wave propagating toward the left. A wave is classified
as expansive or compressive, depending on whether the wave is traveling into a
region of higher or lower density. The result should also show that at a rigid wall,
an incidental expansion wave reflects as an expansion wave and an incidental
compression wave reflects as a compression wave. It can also be shown that the
type of a wave is changed after being reflected from an open end.
The conclusion on wave reflection from a closed or open end seems to con-
tradict the conclusion obtained from the output of Program 2.8. However, when
the type of a wave is defined in terms of the sign of u in combination with the
direction of propagation, as shown in Fig. 3.3, p. 72 of Liepmann and Roshko
(1957), the contradiction is automatically resolved.