
FTOER ANALYSIS 629
Fiber and wood staining
Chemical stains can help with the analysis by
identifying the type of pulping method used to
generate the fibers. This might be more important
in brown papers that might have some recycled
newsprint rather than in white printing papers, but
these might have some bleached CTMP pulp.
Hoadley (1990) references examples of
species determination of wood using chemical
stains including boxelder and other maples, red
gum and black tupelo, elms, pond and sand pines,
spruces and pines, and other groups. Separation
of red and white oaks and red and sugar maples is
discussed in Panshin and de Zeeuw (1980). East-
ern spruce and balsam fir are separated by the
method of Kutscha et al. in Wood Sci. and Tech.
12:293-308(1978). Separation of heartwood and
sapwood is referenced (Kutscha and Sachs, 1962).
Iodine is used to detect the presence of
starch, which might be present in sapwood but not
heartwood or in paper such as in the detection of
forged currency. It is used with iodide to form
the soluble
I3'
species in water (0.3% I2 and 1.5%
KI in water). Safranin O is a general stain for
cellulosic materials (red). It is used as a 0.5—1
%
solution in water or 50% ethanol.
Pulp stains are described in detail in Graff
(1940),
Isenberg (1967), and TAPPI Standard
T401 om-82. Graff (1940) describes three types
of stains. (1) Spot stains or groundwood reagents
using chemicals such as aniline sulfate, phloroglu-
cinol & hydrochloric acid, and/?—nitroaniline for
detection of mechanical pulps in paper. The first
class is said here to be of limited value. (2) The
iodine/iodide metallic salt stains including the
Herzberg stain, the "A" stain, and the "C" stain;
these give qualitative information about fibers. (3)
Aniline dyes for the determination of
the
degree of
cooking, bleaching, and purity of pulps.
Phloroglucinol is specific for lignin, causing
it to turn red. It is used as a 2% solution in
18.5%
HCl. Isenberg (1967) suggests mixing 1 g
in 50 mL of EtOH to which is added 25 mL of
concentrated HCl; this is made up immediately
before use. One use is to show mechanical pulps
in white papers.
Mechanical softwood and hardwoods are
differentiated with the use of 2% aniline sulfate
made acidic (1 drop concentrated H2SO4 per 50
mL) followed by 0.02% methylene blue after
removal of the first dye by blotting. Softwoods
are yellow and hardwoods are bluish green. The
Maule reaction can also be used.
Mechanical pulp bleached with dithionite no
more than a few months old is determined by
detecting traces of SO2 or sulfite as H2S liberated
by stannous chloride. Several stains are available
to determine the level of bleaching (or cooking) of
pulps,
such as Bright stain. These can be used to
check the uniformity of bleaching (and pulping) in
the mill (Isenberg, 1967). Stains even exist for
the identification of dirt, although scanning elec-
tron microscopy (SEM-EDDAX) page 184) has
made many of these methods somewhat obsolete.
Other
techniques
Monosaccharide analysis (although tedious)
will give a good indication of the ratio of hard-
woods to softwoods since galactose and mannose
come from softwoods. Dissolving pulps will have
low levels of hemicelluloses, of course.
28.2 SOFTWOOD FIBER
Fibers over 2 mm long are most often soft-
wood fibers. Be sure to use Table 26-3 (page
550) as a general guide to softwood fiber analysis,
and Table 26-4 (page 552) as a summary of some
important softwood fiber properties. Fig. 28-1
shows six types of softwood fibers.
Parham and Gray (1990) claim that Doug-
las—fir, redwood, baldcypress, podocarp,
parana—pine, sugar pine, white pine, and hard
pines should
be
distinguishable under most circum-
stances, although these separations require a high
degree of skill. Spruce, larch, and hemlock may
not be able to be distinguished from each other as
with true—fir and western redcedar. If the
source of
the
pulp is known then regional informa-
tion can be used (i.e., European or American;
eastern or western, etc.).
Ray cross—field pitting in softwoods is the
principal means of identification. Examination of
many ray cross—field pits shows whether ray
tracheids are present, whether ray tracheids are
marginal or interspersed, and may indicate the
average height of the rays.
For example. Fig. 28-2 shows some fibers
with ray cross—field pitting on the tracheids. The