1. B.P. Hildebrand and B.B. Brenden, An Introduction to Acoustical Holography, Plenum Press, 1972
2.
B.P. Hildebrand, T.J. Davis, A.J. Boland, and R.L. Silta, A Portable Digital Ultrasonic Holography System
for Imaging Flaws in Heavy Section Materials, IEEE Trans., SV-31, No. 4, 1984, p 287-294
3. B.P. Hildebrand and H.D. Collin
s, Evaluation of Acoustical Holography for the Inspection of Pressure
Vessel Sections, Mater. Res. Stand., Vol 12 (No. 12), Dec 1972, p 23-32
4.
D.E. MacDonald and E.K. Kietzman, "Comparative Evaluation of Acoustic Holography Systems," Report
NP-5130, Electric Power Research Institute, 1987
5. S. Tolansky, Multiple-Beam Interferometry of Surfaces and Films, Clarendon Press, 1948
Strain Measurement for Stress Analysis
L.D. Lineback, Measurements Group, Inc.
Introduction
EXPERIMENTAL STRESS ANALYSIS TECHNIQUES, in one form or another, can be applied at all stages in the life
of load-bearing parts, members, and structures. They are used in new-product engineering, from preliminary design
evaluation to production design testing; in proof and overload testing; in failure analysis, from design defect detection to
redesign validation; and in materials and structural research.
Because stress is not directly measurable, the experimental analysis of engineering stresses must be based on strains,
which can be readily measured by a number of techniques. With measured values of strain and a knowledge of the
mechanical properties of the material from which the structure is fabricated, stresses can be calculated from the
appropriate stress-strain relationship of the material.
The usual objective of stress analysis is to locate and measure the most significant strains in a part, member, or structure.
These include not only the high-level strains located at stress concentrations where the product will most likely fail under
load but also the lowest ones in overdesigned regions where material can be safely removed to save on costs and improve
performance. Except for the simplest of designs, location of these significant strains will normally require a full-field
measurement technique such as photoelasticity or brittle coatings.
Once the areas of significant strains are identified, the stress analyst generally makes one or more measurements of strain
at a point to accurately determine the magnitude and direction of the principal strains. Depending on the nature of the
load, type of material, and mode of failure, it may also be necessary to measure the maximum shear strain. For making
these point measurements of strain, both electrical resistance strain gages and photoelastic coatings are widely used.
In addition to the kinds of strains to be measured, it is important to consider a number of other practical criteria when
selecting the appropriate strain measurement technique. These generally include:
• Location of test site (laboratory or field)
• Type of loading (static, dynamic, or a combination)
• Anticipated strain range
• Required resolution and accuracy of measurement
• Operating environment (temperature, medium, and so on)
• Duration of test (from microseconds to decades)
For specialized measurements, other parameters may also require consideration.