29
in the writings of intellectuals whose discus-
sion of the visual arts is simply part of their
wider body of work.
‘Professional’ art criticism in the years im-
mediately following World War II was largely
influenced by a resurfacing of the prewar ab-
straction/representation debate in the visual
arts, which meant that critics took sides, were
combative, and rhetorical in approach and
became promoters of the art they had en-
gaged with. Michel Tapié and Julien Alvard,
for example, were both militant apologists
for abstract art, the French counterparts of
Clement Greenberg in the United States, cre-
ating trends as much as discussing them.
With his 1951 exhibition, ‘Les Signifiants de
l’informel’, Tapié defined, launched and
thereafter promoted the art informel move-
ment. The critic Pierre Restany, initially at
least, also argued for abstract art, allying
himself with the Lyrical Abstraction move-
ment created in 1947 and promoting the
work of this group of painters. The absence
of a well-argued, intellectually committed
philosophical foundation for the opinions of
these critiques de métier was illustrated when
Restany, in 1960, without apparent hesita-
tion, changed sides in the abstraction/figura-
tion debate. Defining a number of disparate
artists (Yves Klein, Hains, Arman, Tinguely
et al.) as Nouveaux Réalistes and promoting
their work himself, Restany now declared
himself an opponent of abstract art. A famili-
arity with the opportunities of the art market
appears to have been a determining factor in
the positions taken up by critics such as
Restany, who, like Tapié, was creating a
product and selling it. Restany has been re-
garded as the most representative French ex-
ponent of the type of criticism dominating the
period 1950–70, of which Greenberg as the
promoter of Abstract Expressionism in
America is probably the best-known practi-
tioner.
A parallel trend in French art criticism since
the war stems from the tendency of intellectu-
als in France to turn their attention to the
visual arts as part of their principal project.
While the most influential art criticism of this
type, grounded in structuralism and
poststructuralism has come to the fore since
the 1960s, the model of the philosopher en-
gaging with the fine arts was defined by Jean-
Paul Sartre in the immediate postwar years.
His admiration for Giacometti, as well as his
attacks on Surrealism, stemmed from his exis-
tentialist position, and found expression in his
1948 essay on Giacometti for the catalogue of
the sculptor’s first postwar exhibition as well
as in his critical endorsements of the work of
Jean Dubuffet, Wols, Calder and Masson. In
the same period, Merleau-Ponty gave a
phenomenological account of the work of art-
ists such as Cézanne.
From the late 1950s on, important critical
writing on art became increasingly grounded
in theory. An offshoot of Saussure’s structural
linguistics—which saw the basic unit of any
language, including the visual, as sign—this
approach to the image enabled French aca-
demics to move between different disciplines—
sociology, literature, philosophy, psychoanaly-
sis and the visual arts—and to free themselves
from the traditional stylistic boundaries of aca-
demic discourse. Thus Michel Foucault analy-
ses Velasquez’s Las Meniñas, Jacques Lacan
discusses Holbein’s The French Ambassadors,
Roland Barthes writes essays on Dutch paint-
ing and Cy Twombly, and Jean-François
Lyotard produces articles on Duchamp,
Barnett Newman and Daniel Buren. The
1980s saw a two-volume study of Francis Ba-
con by Deleuze and a book on the graphic art
of Antonin Artaud by Derrida. Derrida’s
poststructuralism also informs his collection
of essays, Truth in Painting (La Vérité en
peinture) of 1978. Analyses of the visual arts
can also be seen in the work of Baudrillard
and Julia Kristeva. This approach, based on a
response to the visual image in terms of signs,
where the emphasis is on the reading of the
art work itself rather than the documentation
surrounding it, is perhaps the most distinctive
feature of contemporary art criticism in
France.
CAROL WILCOX
See also: structuralism
art criticism