39
French culture. But in fact, the general model
of the subject, as opposed to the self, which
emerged in such quarters as linguistic theory
centring on enunciation, Lacanian psychoa-
nalysis with its emphasis on the illusory na-
ture of the ego, or Cixous’s account of
gendered subjectivity and language, paved the
way for an increasingly self-aware and sophis-
ticated mode of autobiographical writing at-
tuned to the dispersion of a multiply consti-
tuted subjectivity. The inherently hybrid char-
acter of autobiography, at the crossroads of
the referential and the fictional, and capable
of finding expression in a wide range of me-
dia, visual (film, photograph, video) as well as
verbal, becomes a distinct advantage. In the
1990s it has given autobiography a central
position in a number of important cultural
currents. These include the focus on the récit
de vie (life history) which has led to new ex-
periments in oral testimony, biography and
travel writing, and the focus on the ordinary
and the everyday, associated with such theo-
reticians as Henri Lefebvre and Michel de
Certeau. In these contexts autobiography,
while by no means supporting die-hard indi-
vidualism, does have a positive role in renego-
tiating the place of the subjective in wider so-
cial and intellectual formations.
Although it had been published just before
the war, Michel Leiris’s Manhood (L’Age
d’homme) only made its real impact when re-
issued in 1946 with an essay which has come
to be seen as a manifesto for a new kind of
literary enterprise. ‘The Autobiographer as
Torero’ (‘De la littérature considered comme
une tauromachie’) underlined the work’s radi-
cal structural and thematic innovations. The
first modern autobiographer to break with
chronology, Leiris had structured his self-in-
vestigation around certain obsessional motifs
organized in associative patterns. Crucially,
Leiris underlined the risk-taking candour of the
confessional autobiographer, willing to ‘tell all’,
and thus to expose himself to vilification, as
the matador exposes himself to the bull’s horns.
The element of risk gave autobiography the
edge over other forms of literary expression
which seemed merely footling in the face of
the horrors of war. In its authenticity, auto-
biographical writing could constitute a form
of that engagement which Jean-Paul Sartre was
calling for on the part of intellectuals.
In fact, Leiris’s autobiographical project, to
be pursued for the rest of his life, notably in
the four-volume cycle (1948–76) The Rules of
the game (La Règle du jeu), partly inspired
Sartre’s own passionate interest in human lives,
which first found full expression in his biogra-
phy of Charles Baudelaire, also published in
1946 and in fact dedicated to Leiris. Sartre’s
next biographical subject was the homosexual
writer Jean Genet. This was partly on the
strength of Genet’s 1948 The Thief’s Journal
(Journal du voleur), a major autobiographical
work which, as in Leiris’s case, combined a
high degree of awareness of the pitfalls and
challenges of autobiography with a radical
approach to narrative and time. Sartre himself
embarked on an autobiography in the early
1950s, but by the time it was published to great
acclaim in 1964 as Words (Les Mots), two
other important autobiographies had been
published by members of his circle, Simone de
Beauvoir’s 1958 Memoirs of a Dutiful Daugh-
ter (Mémoires d’une jeune fille rangée) and
André Gorz’s 1958 The Traitor (Le Traître).
These were to be followed by Violette Leduc’s
La Bâtarde, an important autobiography by a
writer close to Beauvoir. While all these auto-
biographies have common features which can
be associated with existentialism (for exam-
ple, a concern with betrayal and bad faith),
Sartre’s Words is in a class of its own. Witty
and fast-moving, it injects a strong dose of
parody into the autobiographical proceedings,
while in fact, as critical analysis has shown,
disguising a complex structure of argument
behind a loosely chronological surface.
A decade later, three works published in
1975 can be seen as the next milestone in the
evolution of autobiography in France. First, a
brilliant critical work by Philippe Lejeune, Le
Pacte autobiographique (The Autobiographi-
cal Contract), placed autobiography at the top
of the literary critical agenda. Well-versed in
contemporary literary theory, Lejeune com-
bined a concern for rigorous formal criteria
autobiography