209
imprinting of the child with social and famil-
ial structures mediated through the maternal
body. The symbolic has to do with sign and
syntax and with linguistic and social laws, and
is said to be a paternal function. In its expla-
nations of some of the difficult new concepts
it was inventing, Kristeva’s early work used
some very traditional metaphors based on gen-
der (for example, the traditional association
of women and nature), which her later work
has reassessed. But even at that early stage,
she developed the metaphors in ways that were
productive for feminist political positions. See,
for example, About Chinese Women (Des
Chinoises), published in 1974; Polylogue,
1977). The Powers of Horror: An Essay in
Abjection (Pouvoirs de l’horreur) of 1980 is a
powerful critique of the conventional associa-
tion of woman with nature and its monstrous
repressions; which has produced, Kristeva ar-
gues, the Western fear of the archaic mother.
The work of Luce Irigaray is conceived in
sustained opposition to the philosophical and
psychoanalytic masters who organize the acad-
emy. It challenges the masculinist terms of their
logic, questions their right to lay down the laws
of debate, and sets up in opposition radically
different feminine sets of images for thought.
Speculum of the Other Woman (Speculum de
l’autre femme), published in 1974, addresses
itself to the question of what constitutes femi-
nine difference, which it describes as the burn-
ing question of our age. Freud is dismissed for
having assimilated the formation of the femi-
nine subject to a system expressed in terms of
the phallus, and is attacked for the contradic-
tions and ill-disguised self-interest of his logic.
Plato is swept up in the condemnation, as one
of the originating masters of masculine
thought. Marine Lover of Friedrich Nietzsche
(Amante marine de Friedrich Nietzsche) from
1980 attacks this other significant pole of con-
temporary Western philosophy, as yet another
emblem of the sameness of masculine thought,
always reducing feminine Other to its mirror.
Irigaray attacks specifically Nietzsche’s celebra-
tion of the will to power, his emphasis on re-
currence, the sharp binary oppositions that his
thought imposes, and its aspirations to pos-
sess its object. Against these, she places the
preoccupation with change, difference,
inclusiveness, openness and sharing, which she
claims as the property of feminine thought.
Marine Lover is a major text for reading
Irigaray’s famous association of the feminine
with fluidity (the mobile, all-embracing, crea-
tive sea) and, again, her opposition to the ra-
tionalist tradition. This time it is Socrates who
is called to the tribunal, along with his mod-
ern heir. Re-evaluation of modes of thought
carries with it the re-evaluation of personal
relationships. This Sex Which Is not One (Ce
sexe qui n’en est pas un) of 1977 collects im-
portant essays on feminine sexuality and writ-
ing, including a reconsideration of mother/fa-
ther roles. A fresh version of the bonds between
mother and daughter appears in And One Does
Not Move Without the Other (Et l’une ne
bouge pas sans l’autre) of 1979. More empiri-
cal investigations into the different ways men
and women use language figure in, for exam-
ple, Sex and Gender Through Language (Sexes
et genres à travers les langues) published in
1990, and/e, tu, nous (1990).
The reputation of Hélène Cixous, founder
in 1977 of the influential Centre d’Études
Féminines, rests principally in her creative writ-
ing, which itself constitutes an exploration into
key theoretical issues concerned with the na-
ture of the feminine subject, and the relation to
writing of feminine desire and the female body
(écriture féminine). Her work is closely associ-
ated with the psychoanalytic theory of the
group Psych et Po. But her thinking on the re-
lations of body, history and language, and also
her distinctive style, is at least as heavily in-
debted to the Irish modernist James Joyce, on
whom she wrote her thesis. The images and
structures of her writing embody the search
theorized by Kristeva and Irigaray for a mode
of writing that models what is characterized as
the specific nature of feminine desire—see, for
example, The Laugh of the Medusa (Le Rire de
la Méduse) from 1975, ‘Coming to Writing’
and Other Essays (La Venue à l’écriture) from
1977, and The Newly Born Woman (La Jeune
Née) of 1975. The play Portrait de Dora (1976)
turns back against Freud the content and form
feminist thought