ACCA F5 Performance Management - 2010 - Study text - Emile Woolf Publishing
Подождите немного. Документ загружается.
Chapter 4: Pricing decisions
© EWP Go to www.emilewoolfpublishing.com for Q/As, Notes & Study Guides 105
Product X
Product Y
Direct costs
$
$
Materials 6.00
6
Labour 12.00
18
Expenses 6.00
6
24.00
30
Absorbed overhead 30.00
45
Full cost 54.00
75
Mark-up (20%) 10.80
15
Selling price/unit 64.80
90
The budgeted profit would be (15,000 × $10.80) + (10,000 × $15) = $312,000.
(b) Machine hour basis
Budgeted machine hours = (15,000 × 1) + (10,000 × 1) = 25,000 hours.
Overhead absorption rate = $900,000/25,000 = $36 per machine hour.
Product X
Product Y
Direct costs
$
$
Materials 6.00
6.00
Labour 12.00
18.00
Expenses 6.00
6.00
24.00
30.00
Absorbed overhead 36.00
36.00
Full cost 60.00
66.00
Mark-up (20%) 12.00
13.20
Selling price/unit 72.00
79.20
The budgeted profit would be (15,000 × $12) + (10,000 × $13.20) = $312,000.
However, the different bases of absorbing overheads would give a
significantly different full cost for each product, and a different selling price. It
is doubtful whether the entity can sell 15,000 units of product X and 10,000
units of product Y, no matter which prices are chosen.
4.3 Marginal cost plus pricing (mark-up pricing)
With marginal cost plus pricing, also called mark-up pricing, a mark-up or profit
margin is added to the marginal cost in order to obtain a selling price.
Paper F5: Performance management
106 Go to www.emilewoolfpublishing.com for Q/As, Notes & Study Guides © EWP
$
Variable production costs 600
Other variable costs 200
Marginal cost 800
Mark-up (added to marginal cost) 400
Selling price 1,200
The method of calculating sales price is similar to full-cost pricing, except that
marginal cost is used instead of full cost. The mark-up represents contribution.
Advantages of marginal cost plus pricing
The advantages of a marginal cost plus approach are as follows:
It is useful in some industries such as retailing, where prices might be set by
adding a mark-up to the purchase cost of items bought for resale. The size of the
mark-up can be varied to reflect demand conditions. For example, in a
competitive market, a lower mark-up might be added to high-volume items.
It draws management attention to contribution and the effects of higher or lower
sales volumes on profit. This can be particularly useful for short-term pricing
decisions, such as pricing decisions for a market penetration policy (described
later).
When an organisation has spare capacity, marginal cost plus pricing can be used
in the short-term to set a price which covers variable cost. This approach is used
by hotels, airlines, railway companies and telephone companies to price off-
peak usage. As long as fixed costs are covered by peak users and the lower price
set does not affect the main market, a marginal cost price can be set off-peak to
increase demand and therefore contribution.
It is more appropriate where fixed costs are low and variable costs are high.
Disadvantages of marginal cost plus pricing
A marginal cost plus approach to pricing also has disadvantages.
Although the size of the mark-up can be varied according to demand conditions,
marginal cost plus pricing is a cost-based pricing method, and does not properly
take market conditions into consideration.
It ignores fixed overheads in the pricing decision. Prices must be high enough to
make a profit after covering all fixed costs. Cost-based pricing decisions
therefore cannot ignore fixed costs altogether. A risk with marginal cost plus
pricing is that the mark-up on marginal cost might not be sufficient to cover
fixed costs and achieve a profit.
4.4 Return on investment (ROI) pricing
This method of pricing might be used in a decentralised environment where an
investment centre within a company is required to meet a target return on capital
employed. Prices might be set to achieve a target percentage return on the capital
invested.
With return on investment pricing, the selling price per unit may be calculated as:
Chapter 4: Pricing decisions
© EWP Go to www.emilewoolfpublishing.com for Q/As, Notes & Study Guides 107
[
]
volumeBudgeted
employedCapitalROI%Target+divisiontheofcoststotalBudgeted ×
When the investment centre makes and sells a single product, the budgeted
volume is sales volume.
When the investment centre makes and sells several different products,
budgeted volume might be production volume in hours, and the mark-up added
to cost is then a mark-up for the number of hours worked on the product item.
Alternatively, the budgeted volume might be sales revenue, and the mark-up is
then calculated as a percentage of the selling price (a form of full cost plus
pricing).
Advantages of ROI pricing
The advantages of an ROI approach to pricing are as follows:
ROI pricing is a method of deciding an appropriate profit margin for cost plus
pricing.
The target ROI can be varied to allow for differing levels of business risk.
Disadvantages of ROI pricing
An ROI approach to pricing also has disadvantages.
Like all cost-based pricing methods, it does not take market conditions into
sufficient consideration, and the prices that customers will be willing to pay.
Since it is a form of full cost plus pricing, it shares most of the other
disadvantages as full cost plus pricing.
Example
A manufacturer is about to launch a new product.
The non-current assets needed for production will cost $4,000,000 and working
capital requirements are estimated at $800,000.
The expected annual sales volume is 40,000 units.
Variable production costs are $60 per unit.
Fixed production costs will be $600,000 each year and annual fixed non-production
costs will be $200,000.
Required
(a) Calculate selling price using:
(i) full cost plus 20%
(ii) marginal cost plus 40 %
(iii) pricing based on a target return on investment of 10% per year.
Paper F5: Performance management
108 Go to www.emilewoolfpublishing.com for Q/As, Notes & Study Guides © EWP
(b) If actual sales are only 20,000 units and the selling price is set at full cost plus
20%, what will the profit be for the year?
Answer
(a)
(i) Full cost plus 20% $ per unit
Variable cost 60
Fixed costs ($600,000 + $200,000)/40,000 units 20
Full cost 80
Mark-up: 20% on cost 16
Selling price 96
(ii) Marginal cost plus 40% $ per unit
Variable cost 60
Mark-up: 40% on variable cost 24
Selling price 84
(iii) Target ROI pricing $
Non-current assets 4,000,000
Working capital 800,000
Capital employed 4,800,000
Profit required ($4,800,000 × 10%)
480,000
Profit required per unit (40,000 units) $12
$
Variable cost 60
Fixed costs (see above, full cost plus pricing) 20
Full cost 80
Profit 12
Selling price 92
(b) If sales are only 20,000 units (= below budget):
Profit for the year $
Sales (20,000 units × $96)
1,920,000
Variable costs (20,000 units × $60)
(1,200,000)
Fixed costs (800,000)
Net loss (80,000)
Chapter 4: Pricing decisions
© EWP Go to www.emilewoolfpublishing.com for Q/As, Notes & Study Guides 109
4.5 Market skimming prices
When a company introduces a new product to the market for the first time, it might
choose a pricing policy based on ‘skimming the market’.
When a new product is introduced to the market, a few customers might be
prepared to pay a high price to obtain the product, in order to be one of the first
people to have it. Buying the new product gives the buyer prestige, so the buyer
will pay a high price to get it.
In order to increase sales demand, the price must be gradually reduced, but with a
skimming policy, the price is reduced slowly and by small amounts each time. The
contribution per unit with a skimming policy is very high, although unit costs of
production could also be quite high, since sales volumes are low.
To charge high prices, the firm might have to spend heavily on advertising and
other marketing expenditure.
Market skimming will probably be more effective for new ‘high technology’
products, such as (in the past) flat screen televisions and laptop computers.
Firms using market skimming for a new product will have to reduce prices later as
new competitors enter market with rival products. A skimming strategy is therefore
a short-term pricing strategy that cannot usually be sustained for a long period of
time.
Skimming prices and a product differentiation strategy
It is much more difficult to apply a market skimming pricing policy when
competitors have already introduced a rival product to the market. Customers in
the market will already have a view of the prices to expect, and might not be
persuaded to buy a new version of a product in the market unless its price is lower
than prices of existing versions.
However, it may be possible to have a policy of market skimming if it is possible to
differentiate a new product from its rivals, usually on the basis of quality. This is
commonly found in the market for cars, for example, where some manufacturers
succeed in presenting new products as high-quality models. High-quality cars cost
more to produce, and sales demand may be fairly low: however, profits are
obtained by charging high prices and earning a high contribution for each unit sold.
4.6 Market penetration prices
Market penetration pricing is an alternative pricing policy to market skimming,
when a new product is launched on to the market for the first time.
With market penetration pricing, the aim is to set a low selling price for the new
product, in order to create a high sales demand as quickly as possible. With a
successful penetration pricing strategy, a company might ‘capture the market’
before competitors can introduce rival products.
Paper F5: Performance management
110 Go to www.emilewoolfpublishing.com for Q/As, Notes & Study Guides © EWP
A firm might also use market penetration prices to launch its own version of a
product into an established market, with the intention that offering low prices will
attract customers and win a substantial share of the market.
Penetration pricing and a cost leadership strategy
A cost leadership market strategy is a strategy of trying to become the lowest-cost
producer of a product in the market. Low-cost production is usually achieved
through economies of scale and large-scale production and sales volumes.
Penetration pricing is consistent with a cost leadership strategy, because low prices
help a company to obtain a large market share, and a large market share means high
volumes, economies of scale and lower costs.
4.7 Pricing of complementary products and product line pricing
Complementary products
Complementary products are products that ‘go together’, so that if customers buy
one of the products, they are also likely to buy the other. Examples of
complementary products are:
computer games consoles and computer games
mobile telephones (portable phones) and telephone calls from mobile phones.
Occasionally if a company sells two or more complementary products it could sell
one product at a very low price in the knowledge that if sales demand for the first
product is high, customers will then buy more of the second product (which can be
priced to provide a much bigger profit margin).
This price strategy has been used by some companies in mobile telephones.
Telephones have been offered at low prices to customers, in the knowledge that
customers will then use their phones to make expensive telephone calls. Losses on
selling phones can therefore be offset by high profits on the phone calls.
Product lines
A product line is a range of products made by the same manufacturer (or a range of
services from the same service provider) where the products have some similarity
or connection so that customers see them as belonging to the same ‘family’.
Examples of a product line are:
a brand and design of tableware manufactured by the same company (such as a
range of tableware items in Dresden china)
a brand and range of sports items (such as rackets or golf equipment) made by
the same manufacturer.
When manufacturers produce a line of related items, the pricing strategy for all
items in the product line might be the same (for example, a product line might be
sold as a high-price, high-quality branded range).
Chapter 4: Pricing decisions
© EWP Go to www.emilewoolfpublishing.com for Q/As, Notes & Study Guides 111
4.8 Volume discounting
A price strategy of volume discounting involves selling at reduced prices to
customers who buy in large volumes over a period of time, or for large-value sales
orders.
Volume discounting can have either of the following purposes:
To persuade customers to buy a product, by offering a lower price (on condition
that the order is above a given size)
To increase profits by selling in larger volumes, even though the sales price is
lower.
4.9 Price discrimination (differential pricing)
With price discrimination (or differential pricing), a firm sells a single identical
product in different segments of the market at different prices.
A market segment is simply a separately-identifiable part of the entire market.
Customers in one market segment have different characteristics, buying habits,
preferences and needs from the customers in other segments of the same total
market.
For price discrimination to work successfully, the different market segments must
be kept separate. It might be possible to charge different prices for the same
product:
in different geographical areas – for example, it would be possible to sell the
same product at very different prices in the US and in China
at different times of the day – for example, travel tickets might be priced
differently at different times of the day or the week
to customers in different age groups – for example, offering special prices to
individuals over a certain age, or to students or to children.
4.10 Relevant cost pricing (minimum pricing)
Relevant cost pricing may be used for pricing a product or a service in special
circumstances. In some circumstances, an entity might be prepared to charge a price
for an item that leaves it no worse off than if it were to choose the next most
profitable course of action. This is the marginal price or minimum price of an item.
A minimum price of an item is the total of the relevant costs of making and selling
it.
Alternatively, a company might calculate the relevant cost of selling an item to a
customer, and then set the sales price at an amount that will provide an incremental
profit (incremental profit = actual sales price minus relevant cost price).
Relevant costs are explained more fully in a later chapter on decision-making. (You
may have learned about them already in your previous studies.) Briefly, relevant
costs are the future cash flows arising as a direct consequence of a decision. Relevant
costs can be either:
Paper F5: Performance management
112 Go to www.emilewoolfpublishing.com for Q/As, Notes & Study Guides © EWP
additional costs (cash flows), or
the loss of contribution or profit that would occur as a result of taking a
particular course of action.
In the context of deciding a sales price for a product or contract, a relevant cost price
is the total of the relevant costs that would be incurred as a consequence of making
and selling the item that is being priced.
Relevant costs include opportunity costs. Opportunity costs arise when a resource
is in scarce supply (a limiting factor), and making and selling the item would
require the use of some of the scarce resource. The relevant cost of the scarce
resource is therefore the sum of:
its variable cost, and
the contribution that would be lost by using the resource to make and sell the
product, instead o fusing it in the most profitable alternative way.
Example
Bota is a shipbuilding company. It uses two materials, steel and fibreglass.
It needs to complete a shipping order using 500 tonnes of steel and 1,000 tonnes of
fibreglass.
The work force will have to work 2,000 hours on making the boat: 1,200 hours will
be in the assembly process and the remainder will be in the finishing process
(painting the boat and other finishing tasks).
Bota will charge a sales price of relevant cost plus 50%.
Bota has 200 tonnes of steel held in inventory. This originally cost $20 per tonne.
Steel now has a current market price of $24 and the inventory could be sold for $16
per tonne. Bota no longer produces steel boats and has no other use for steel. It only
produces fibreglass boats on a regular basis.
There are 400 tonnes of fibreglass held in inventory. This originally cost $40 per
tonne. It currently has a purchase price of $46 per tonne and a selling price of $30
per tonne. (Selling price and net realisable value can be assumed to be the same
figure).
All labour is paid $8 per hour and is treated as a variable cost. To complete the
contract on time, labour for the finishing process will have to be transferred from
other work which produces contribution at a rate of $6 per hour. There is currently
surplus capacity for assembly labour amounting to 1,000 hours for the duration of
the contract: if this time is not used on assembly work for this contract, it will be
paid for as idle time. Owing to other work requirements, however, any further
assembly labour hours in excess of these 1,000 hours will have to be hired on a
temporary basis at a rate of $10 per hour.
Chapter 4: Pricing decisions
© EWP Go to www.emilewoolfpublishing.com for Q/As, Notes & Study Guides 113
Required
Calculate the price that Bota will quote on the contract.
Answer
$
Steel
Inventory already held
200 tonnes: opportunity cost =
realisable value $16 per tonne
3,200
Additional purchases required 300 tonnes × $24 per tonne 7,200
Fibreglass 1,000 tonnes × $46 per tonne 46,000
Existing inventory could be used on
other jobs; therefore the relevant
cost is the current market purchase
price
Assembly labour 200 hours × $10 per hour 2,000
The cost of the other 1,000 hours wil
lbe paid anyway as idle time, and so
is not a relevant cost
Finishing labour
Variable cost 800 hours × $8 per
hour
6,400
Opportunity cost: contribution lost
by switching from other work: 800
hours × $6 per hour
4,800
Relevant cost 69,600
Mark-up (50%) 34,800
Quoted price 104,400
Paper F5: Performance management
114 Go to www.emilewoolfpublishing.com for Q/As, Notes & Study Guides © EWP