economical review) stage, we shall therefore ask for confirmation and for verifica-
tion, at basic design level, of the machines making part of the contract. We shall
also ask for and compare the collected past experiences, consider and request a new
engineering lead time of UT, as well as an evaluation on the manufacturing lead
times, besides ensuring a Quality Control Plan (QCP). All these elements must be
considered as critical conditions for a possible risk analysis, since they could have
repercussions on lead times, costs and performances.
On the basis of the requested machines, we shall then pass on to verify the JET
0 exploded, i.e. the formalisation of the JET REO plus some changes, but preserv-
ing its agreed basis. By means of such document, which is present in the One World
IT system, we shall proceed to verify the manufacturing features that the equipment
should have if the REO results are confirmed at manufacturing strategy level.
We shall therefore define which, how many and what kind of machines are to be
manufactured internally, i.e. in the Danieli workshops; which ones are always to
be manufactured internally, but in the Danieli offshore production units; which
machines are to be purchased externally on the basis of the Danieli detail or basic
design, depending on the product to be bought and manufactured; and which
machines are available on the external market and must therefore be purchased,
since their technology is not produced by Danieli, such as, for instance, electric
motors, fans, hydraulic pumps, special components like load cells, transformers,
etc.; and finally which machines can be manufactured directly by the customer
according to Danieli design, in which case again it may be either BD or DD, depend-
ing on the product and on the customer’s specific demands. Remind that in the latter
case there could be the need to make a conversion of the Danieli design, as it hap-
pens for instance in China and in India, which is then executed by the customer and
where Danieli shall give its support by confirming the comparison of its own stand-
ardisation with specific customer’s demands regarding the materials requested for
equipment construction, such as steel grades, sections, heat treatments, etc.
We shall also have to evaluate the contractual responsibility related to products
designed by Danieli but manufactured by the final customer, since there may be cases
requiring expediting by Danieli to give confirmation of their execution according to
the constructive dictates of the Danieli design. We shall therefore check also the
budget for the expediting and customer-service activities. The lower limit of the supply
could consist even in the supply of the sole design, without responsibilities on manu-
facture but only on design itself. This involves some risks that must be generically
pointed out at REO stage or otherwise must be considered in the project budget and
held up to view in case of dispute with the customer at project execution stage.
Let us always determine whether the plant is new or existing, since this will
imply a completely different approach. When we refer to a new plant, we generally
start from a greenfield situation, and therefore from the construction of new buildings,
new civil works and auxiliary facilities to be used for the new plant. With new
plants, we have the possibility to transfer the Danieli experiences and therefore
guide the customer towards the most suitable solution according to its needs, by
analysing and, if necessary, supporting the latter in the cost cutting process. With
the turnkey products, the whole has instead a more complex internal development
11.4 Technical Specification Analysis 161