EVOLUTIONISM IN REFORM THOUGHT 349
ciple of Spencerian sociology is that 'living organisms and social systems
gradually change in order to maintain forms in harmony with their envi-
ronment and circumstances'.
2
' Their conclusion was that the Chinese
national psychology must be recognized as ill-adapted to modern polit-
ical forms. To Yen Fu the lesson of the new democracy was that 'the
level of civilization of our masses cannot be forced'.
26
Liang Ch'i-ch'ao
acknowledged that the revolution as an event was irreversible, but drew
the lessons of a conservative historicism: 'the [imperial] political authority,
once trampled, cannot recover its mystery'.
27
If after 1911 a deterministic emphasis upon China's historical situation
meant resignation to backwardness, stress on the human factor spelled
acceptance of moral responsibility for failure. Evolutionary cosmology
had balanced the determinism of cosmic forces with a complementary
emphasis upon the Faustian human spirit as contributing to the process
of change. Consequently the failure of the republic implied not merely
fate but also moral blame. In the mood of disillusionment that swept
the country, intellectuals freely castigated new republican office-holders,
but their overall focus was not just on corruption of leadership, but on
the cultural backwardness of the race which they thought it illustrated.
Even as indignation poured forth, with it seeped the poison of
self-
accusation. Critical evaluations of the Chinese 'national character', and
of'national psychology' became stock essay themes after 1912. Inasmuch
as these assumed that the people as a whole are the activating agents in
the social organism, they carried on the voluntaristic tradition of reform
thought, but in a context which inescapably compromised the reformers
themselves.
Liang Ch'i-ch'ao's historiographical principles did not change, but
the lessons he drew from history did. When in 1916 he looked back over
the first five years of the republic, he still saw his own generation as a
'transitional age' whose 'motive force' had been the external stimulus of
the West, causing the old doctrines to lose their credibility. The problem
was,
he thought, that China's 'reactive force' had dissipated itself in a
single violent spasm of revolution and restorationist backlash. He still
believed that human psychic energies move history in a long-term arc of
progress, but for the present time in China he saw these as depleted by
habituation to novelty, and feared that in the immediate future 'there will
be no more thunder and lightning available for use'. Such exhaustion of
25 Ch'ien Chih-hsiu, 'Shuo t'i-ho' (On adaptation),
Tung-fang
tsa-chih,
10. 10 (i Jan. 1914).
26 Quoted in Schwartz, In
search
0}
wealth
and power, 218-19.
27 Liang Ch'i-ch'ao, 'Fu-ku ssu-ch'ao p'ing-i' (Critique of the restorationist thought tide),
TaChung-hua,
1. 7 (20 July 1915).
Cambridge Histories Online © Cambridge University Press, 2008