
2 INTRODUCTION: MARITIME AND CONTINENTAL
Yuan Shih-k'ai's foreign loans raised controversy; the New Culture move-
ment after 1917 was led by scholars returned from abroad; the May
Fourth movement of 1919 was triggered by power politics at Versailles;
the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) was founded in 1921 under Comin-
tern prompting; Sun Yat-sen reorganized the Kuomintang (KMT) after
1923 with Soviet help; the Nationalist Revolution 1925-27 was inspired
by patriotic anti-imperialism. Truly, the early republic was moved by
foreign influences that were almost as pervasive as the Japanese invasion
was to become after 1931.
Yet the term 'foreign' is highly ambiguous and may trap us in needless
argument. It requires careful definition. For example, among the 'foreign
influences' just listed, some were events abroad, some were models seen
abroad and imitated in China, some were ideas of foreign origin which
animated Chinese returned from overseas, some were events in China in
which foreign people or ideas played a part. The situation was not simple.
Since the 'foreign' elements in Chinese life during this period were so
widespread, clarity demands that we make a series of distinctions or
propositions. First of all, most readers of these pages probably still
perceive China as a distinct culture, persistent in its own ways, different
from 'the West'. This assumption, reinforced by common observation,
stems from the holistic image of 'China' conveyed by Jesuit writers during
the Enlightenment and further developed by European Sinology. It
represents an acceptance in the West of an image of China as an integrated
society and culture, an image that formed the central myth of the state
and was sedulously propagated by its learned ruling class.
1
Still dominant
in Chinese thinking at the turn of the century, this idea of 'China' as a
distinct cultural entity made 'foreign' into something more than the mere
political distinction that it sometimes was among Western nations.
Second, we must distinguish the actual foreign presence. There were
many foreigners within the country - scores of thousands residing in the
major cities, most of which were treaty ports partially foreign-run;
hundreds were employed by successive Chinese governments; and several
thousand missionaries were at stations in the interior. Add to these the
garrisons of foreign troops and foreign naval vessels on China's inland
waterways, and we can better imagine the 'semi-colonial' aspect of China
under the unequal treaties that continued to give the foreigners their
1 On Sinology and the 'self-image of Chinese civilization', see Arthur F. Wright, 'The study
of Chinese civilization',
Journal
of the History of
Ideas,
21.2 (April-June i960) 233-55. In
developing this essay I have greatly benefited from comments of Marie Claire Bergere,
Mark Elvin, Albert Feuerwerker, Kwang-Ching Liu, Philip A. Kuhn, Denis Twitchett and
Wang Gungwu.
Cambridge Histories Online © Cambridge University Press, 2008