ROOTS OF CONSTITUTIONALISM 257
Second, a major source of disorder in Chinese history had been the
ambiguous definition of power relationships, resulting in struggles over
the imperial succession, conflicts among ministers, and the overbearing
behaviour of magistrates, which could be checked only by popular upri-
sings.
But in a constitutional regime, as K'ang's disciple Liang Ch'i-
ch'ao pointed out in 1900, 'the imperial succession is fixed,. . . the
appointment of high ministers accords with legislative procedure and
popular sentiment, . . . and any dissatisfaction among the people can be
expressed to parliament. . . . Thus a constitutional form of government
can never suffer from disorder.''
Monarchists, among them K'ang and Liang, believed a period of tu-
telage was needed before the Chinese people could rule themselves. In
this conception, influenced by the statecraft tradition of Chinese political
thought, statesmen would combine education and sanctions to keep the
public in order while gradually introducing institutions of popular par-
ticipation. Republicans, on the other hand, led by Sun Yat-sen, argued
that 'the future of China is like building a railroad. Thus if we were now
building a railroad, would we use the first locomotive ever invented
[constitutional monarchy] or today's improved and most efficient one
[a republic] ?'
4
The Ch'ing court put a price on the heads of K'ang and
Liang but later accepted their arguments: in 1906 it ordered preparations
for a monarchical constitution. But before the constitution was promul-
gated, the republicans won the day through revolution.
In some ways the edict of 1906 was more definitive than the Revolution
of 1911. The idea of a republic was challenged at least three times by
monarchists after 1911 - by Yuan Shih-k'ai's imperial venture, by Chang
Hsun's 1917 restoration of the Hsuan-t'ung Emperor, and by the resur-
rection of the 'kingly way' in the Manchukuo of the 1930s. But at no
point since 1906, even after 1949, has the necessity of one form or another
of constitution been seriously questioned. Indeed, ever since the late
Ch'ing a constitution has been considered necessary not only for the
nation but for each political party, chamber of commerce and interest-
group association.
Several sub-national units of government also adopted constitutions.
The most important example of this trend was the so-called 'federalist
movement' of the early 1920s
{lien-sheng
tzu-chihyun-tung,
lit., 'movement
for a federation of self-governing provinces'). Its leaders in Hunan,
Szechwan, Kwangtung and several other southern provinces argued that
3 Liang Ch'i-ch'ao, 'Li hsien-fa i', in
Yin-ping shih
wen-chi,
ts'e 2,
chiian
5, pp. 3-4.
4 Quoted in Michael Gasster,
Chinese intellectuals
and
the Revolution
of 19rt:
The
birth of
modern
Chinese
radicalism,
138.
Cambridge Histories Online © Cambridge University Press, 2008