Cole (1969) pointed out that since the sum of the driving indexes is
equal to one, it follows that if the magnitude of one of the index terms is
reduced, then one or both of the remaining terms must be corresponding-
ly increased. An effective water drive will usually result in maximum
recovery from the reservoir. Therefore, if possible, the reservoir should
be operated to yield a maximum water-drive index and minimum values
for the depletion-drive index and the gas-cap-drive index. Maximum
advantage should be taken of the most efficient drive available, and
where the water drive is too weak to provide an effective displacing
force, it may be possible to utilize the displacing energy of the gas cap.
In any event, the depletion-drive index should be maintained as low as
possible at all times, as this is normally the most inefficient driving force
available.
Equation 11-20 can be solved at any time to determine the magnitude
of the various driving indexes. The forces displacing the oil and gas from
the reservoir are subject to change from time to time and for this reason
Equation 11-20 should be solved periodically to determine whether there
has been any change in the driving indexes. Changes in fluid withdrawal
rates are primarily responsible for changes in the driving indexes. For
example, reducing the oil-producing rate could result in an increased
water-drive index and a correspondingly reduced depletion-drive index in
a reservoir containing a weak water drive. Also, by shutting in wells pro-
ducing large quantities of water, the water-drive index could be increased,
as the net water influx (gross water influx minus water production) is the
important factor.
When the reservoir has a very weak water drive but a fairly large gas
cap, the most efficient reservoir producing mechanism may be the gas
cap, in which case a large gas-cap-drive index is desirable. Theoretically,
recovery by gas-cap drive is independent of producing rate, as the gas is
readily expansible. Low vertical permeability could limit the rate of
expansion of the gas cap, in which case the gas-cap-drive index would be
rate sensitive. Also, gas coning into producing wells will reduce the
effectiveness of the gas-cap expansion due to the production of free gas.
Gas coning is usually a rate sensitive phenomenon, the higher the pro-
ducing rates, the greater the amount of coning.
An important factor in determining the effectiveness of a gas-cap drive
is the degree of conservation of the gas-cap gas. As a practical matter, it
will often be impossible, because of royalty owners or lease agreements,
to completely eliminate gas-cap gas production. Where free gas is being
produced, the gas-cap-drive index can often be markedly increased by
746 Reservoir Engineering Handbook
Reservoir Eng Hndbk Ch 11 2001-10-25 15:59 Page 746