346 CHAPTER 9 POWER·FLOW SOLUTIONS
and updating the jacobian, we compute the new corrections
[aX�l) 1
=
[
3.658453
a X�l)
-
0.552921
- 0.597753
]
-1
[ -0.047079
]
=
[-0.016335 ]
3.444916 - 0.064047 - 0.021214
These corrections also exceed the precision index, and so we move on to the
next iteration with the new corrected values
X
�
2
) = -0.150 +
(
- 0.01(335)
=
-0.166335 rad
x�
2
)
=
0.925 +
(
-0.021214)
=
0.903786
Continuing on to the third iteration, we nd that the corrections x\
J
) and
ax�3) are each smaller in magnitude than the stipulated tolerance of 10
-5
.
Accordingly, we calculate the solution
X\4)
=
-0.166876 rad;
X�
4
)
=
0.903057
The resultant mismatches are insignicant as may be easily checked.
In this example we have actually solved our rst power-ow problem by
the Newton-Raphson method. This is because the two nonlinear equations of
the example are the power-ow equations for the simple system shown in
Fig. 9.3,
Pg1
I
V
ll!
-
Qg
l
)6.0
®
)0.25
To load
(9.36)
(
9.37)
GURE 9
The system with power-ow
equations corresponding to
those of Example 9.4.