//FS2/CUP/3-PAGINATION/SDE/2-PROOFS/3B2/9780521873628C12.3D
–
167
– [163–180] 13.3.2008 11:21AM
explanation of global geological processes, but
many of the ideas have long histories. The
concept of mantle convection can be traced
back to the early nineteenth century when it
was supposed that the deep interior is largely
fluid. Even with the mantle recognized to be
solid, sea floor spreading and subduction were
advocated by A. Holmes and a figure showing
these processes in a form very similar to our
present understanding appeared in the 1944
edition of his textbook Principles of Physical
Geology and is reproduced in Cox (1973, p. 20).
These ideas were brought into focus by echo-
sounding across the Pacific, especially by
H. Hess, a submarine commander during World
War II, who subsequently used his observa-
tions to link continental drift with sea floor
spreading. Plate tectonics was generally accep-
ted only when the structure of the ocean floor
had become clear.
Although comprehension of global geology
was very incomplete before it incorporated the
ocean floors, it is also true that their restricted age
range would present a very limited view of
Earth history without evidence from the conti-
nents. The permanence of the continents is due
to their buoyancy, which prevents subduction.
The continental crust has an average thickness
z ¼37 km and an average density contrast rela-
tive to the underlying mantle D 500 kg m
3
,
giving a mass deficiency (relative to an equal vol-
ume of mantle material) zD 1.85 10
7
kg m
2
.
This is greater than the negative buoyancy
of thermally contracted lithosphere, which has
shrunk by Dz 2.1 km; taking the mantle den-
sity to be ¼3350 kg m
3
, the mass excess is
Dz ¼7.0 10
6
kg m
2
. The negative buoyancy of
cooled lithosphere fails by a factor exceeding
two to overcome the positive buoyancy of con-
tinental crust. Only oceanic sections of plates
subduct and when they bring continental blocks
together, collision zones appear, most impres-
sively the Himalaya. Even for oceanic plates
there is some crustal buoyancy, but it is not
clear that it seriously inhibits subduction of
young oceanic lithosphere. At depth, basalt con-
verts to eclogite and loses its buoyancy, so that
the resistance to subduction is probably a shal-
low effect.
12.2 Wadati–Benioff zones
and subduction
Deep earthquakes were first clearly identified in
1928 from Japanese records studied by K. Wadati.
They are now recognized to occur down to
700 km along the zones of strong subduction,
shown in Fig. 12.2, and to mark inclined planes
extending into the mantle from the zones
of convergence of the lithospheric plates. Deep
ocean trenches mark the lines where the sub-
ducting plates turn down. The contribution
of H. Benioff to the identification of planes of
deep seismicity is acknowledged by referring to
them as Wadati–Benioff zones. By convention
earthquakes are classified into three groups,
with shallow (0 to 60 km), intermediate (60 to
300 km) and deep (>300 km) foci, although it is
sometimes convenient simply to refer to all
earthquakes with foci below 60 km as deep.
Shallow earthquakes are the most numerous.
The largest earthquakes occur at shallow depths
in subduction zones.
The detailed geometries of the Wadati–Benioff
zones are variable and depend on factors such as
plate speed, age of the subducting lithosphere
and its geology, especially the distribution of oce-
anic and continental crust. The deep seismicity of
Japan has been studied in particularly close detail
and gives valuable insight on the subduction pro-
cess. Figure 12.4 shows the distribution of deep
earthquakes in this area, where there are inter-
sections of several subduction arcs. Figure 12.5
shows an east–west cross-section of a subset of
the data in Fig 12.4, between latitudes 398Nand
408N. In this case, precise location of foci by a
close network of seismic stations has delineated
a pair of parallel planes. Focal mechanisms for
earthquakes show that the upper plane is in
down-dip compression and the lower one is in
down-dip extension. These observations are natu-
rally explained by identifying the upper plane
as the upper boundary of the subducting litho-
spheric slab, and the lower plane as the middle of
the slab, which fails in tension due to the negative
buoyancy that is carrying the plate down. In other
subduction zones, down-dip extension dominates
12.2 WADATI–BENIOFF ZONES AND SUBDUCTION 167