A DJ’s Perspective
CHAPTER 23
477
if you’re just learning). Again, which to choose would depend on what you want
and how much gear you have to plug into the mixer. For instance, if you have
only two decks (CD or vinyl, it doesn’t really matter), then you will probably only
need a two-channel, four-input mixer, i.e. 2 ⫻ phono and 2 ⫻ line. On the other
hand, if you have untold number, then you will need to invest in more channels.
Some mixers have built-in beat counters, and effects, but these won’t neces-
sarily help you mix any better. Personally, I’ve found that the more the fl ashy
parameters, the more it tends to put you off the job at hand since they tend to
be a hindrance more than anything else. It is worth trying them out, though,
and seeing what you think – it’s all about what suits you and your budget. If
I were to recommend one, however, then it would be the Ecler Smac 32. I had
one of these for ages and it was a brilliant mixer with a lovely warm sound and
very slim line to fi t between the decks. Ecler makes some fi ne stuff, with an
expanding range like the impressive HAK 310 and 360 series.
Alternatively, Vestax has a staggering range of quality mixers such as the classic
PMC-05 Pro, or the PCV 275. Equally, Stanton also has a good line with the
SMX401 and 501 and SA8, all of which with are two channels, and Pioneer
has also made some DJ mixers that are worth checking. The most notable is
the DJM300, 500 and 600 series with two and four channels, respectively. The
500/600s have a built-in FX and sampler that are very user-friendly. All these
makes are some of the best I have ever used, but the true cr ème de la cr ème has
to be Soundcraft range of DJ mixers, but these are very expensive and so are
usually limited to the DJs who earn substantial amounts of money.
MP3
I mentioned MP3 earlier when talking about the Pioneer CD DJ decks, but
while some say the difference in sound quality is noticeable when compared to
CD or Minidisk, there really isn’t a lot in it for the average listener. If it’s played
on a quality system, it’s still going to sound good, but watch it if you’re mix-
ing vinyl into it! The sound difference between MP3, and CD for that matter, is
quite substantial because vinyl wins every time for warmth and depth of sound.
Nonetheless, the technology around the MP3 format has, as I’ve mentioned,
evolved into the DJ market, and programmes have started to appear that are spe-
cifi cally for DJ/performance use, whether live at the club/festival or in the studio
or at home. There are fantastic programmes like Native Instruments ’ (NI) Traktor
DJ studio and Soundgraph’s D-Vinyl and PC-DJ, but the real daddy of them all is
Stanton’s Final Scratch system. This is certainly leading the way for this technol-
ogy while very cleverly keeping exactly the same techniques DJs use.
Tracktor, D-Vinyl and PC-DJ are merely software-based in that they allow MP3
and wav fi les to be mixed together via a computer, and are extremely good.
The look is similar to a dual CD analogue desk and the layout is pretty much
the same, with similar buttons, pitch bend/aDJust, etc., with NI’s Traktor being
one of the leaders. With Stanton’s (FS1and2) Final Scratch, however, they have
gone one step further, and then some!